Constructed language
An
artificial or
constructed language (known colloquially as a
conlang among
aficionados), is a
language the
phonology,
grammar and/or
vocabulary of which are specifically devised by an individual or small group, rather than having naturally evolved as part of a
culture the way
natural languages do. Some are designed for use in human
communication (usually to function as
international auxiliary languages), but others are created for use in fiction,
linguistic experimentation, secret (
codes), or for the experience of doing so (
artistic languages,
language games). These languages are sometimes associated with
constructed worlds.
The synonym
planned language is sometimes used when referring to
international auxiliary languages, and by those who may object to the more common term "artificial". Some speakers of
Esperanto avoid the term "artificial language" because they deny that there is something "unnatural" in communicating in this language. However, outside the
Esperanto community the term
language planning refers to prescriptive measures taken regarding a natural language. In this regard, even "natural languages" may be submitted to a certain amount of artificiality, and in the case of
prescriptive grammars, where wholly artificial rules exist such as the one prohibiting a split infinitive in English, the line is difficult to draw.
Constructed languages are often divided into
a priori languages, in which much of the grammar and vocabulary is created from scratch (using the author's imagination or automatic computational means), and
a posteriori languages, where the grammar and vocabulary are derived from one or more natural languages.
Fictional and experimental languages can also be naturalistic, in the sense that they are meant to sound natural and, if derived
a posteriori, they try to follow natural rules of
phonological, lexical and
grammatical change. Since these languages are not usually intended for easy learning or communication, a naturalistic fictional language tends to be more difficult and complex, not less (because it tries to mimic common behaviours of natural languages such as irregular verbs and nouns, complicated phonological rules, etc.).
In light of the above, most constructed languages can broadly be divided as follows:
*
Engineered languages (
engelangs), further subdivided into
philosophical languages and
logical languages (
loglangs) - devised for the purpose of experimentation in
logic or
philosophy*
Auxiliary languages (
auxlangs) - devised for international communication (also IALs, for International Auxiliary Language)
*
Artistic languages (
artlangs) - devised to create aesthetic pleasure
The boundaries between these categories, however, are by no means clear. For example, for some fictional auxiliary languages, and also some constructed languages, it is hard to decide whether they are "artistic" or "engineered".
A constructed language can have native speakers if children learn it at an early age from parents who have learned the language.
Esperanto has a considerable number of
native speakers, variously estimated to be between 200 and 2000. A member of the
Klingon Language Institute,
d'Armond Speers, attempted to raise his son as a native (bilingual with English)
Klingon speaker. Evan Robertson, the creator of
Mosro, successfully taught the language to his four youngest children. However, as soon as a constructed language
does have a number of native speakers, it begins to evolve, and thereby loses its constructed status over time. For example
Modern Hebrew was modelled on Biblical Hebrew rather than engineered from scratch, and has undergone considerable changes since the state of
Israel was founded in
1948.
Proponents of particular constructed languages often have many reasons for using them. Among these, the famous but disputed
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is often cited; this claims that the language one speaks influences the way in which one thinks. Thus, a "better" language should allow the speaker to reach some elevated level of intelligence, or to encompass more diverse points of view. A constructed language could also by this hypothesis be used to
restrict thought, as in
George Orwell's
Newspeak. In contrast, some linguists such as
Stephen Pinker argue that ideas exist in the mind in a language-independent format such that children spontaneously re-invent slang and even grammar with each generation. (See
The Language Instinct.) If this argument is true, an attempt to control the range of human thought through language is doomed to failure, as concepts like "freedom" will reappear in new words if the old ones vanish.
The
ISO 639-2 standard reserves the language code "
art" to denote artificial languages. However, some constructed languages have their own
ISO 639 language codes (e.g. "
eo" and "
epo" for Esperanto, or "
ia" and "
ina" for
Interlingua).
In the
CONLANG Mailing List, a community of
conlangers has developed, which has its own customs, such as
translation relays.
Grammatical speculation is documented from
Classical Antiquity, with
Plato's
Cratylus. However the suggested mechanisms of grammar were designed to explain existing languages (
Latin,
Greek,
Sanskrit), rather than constructing new grammars. Roughly contemporary to Plato, in his descriptive grammar of Sanskrit,
Pāṇini constructed a set of rules for explaining language, so that the text of his grammar may be considered a mixture of natural and constructed language.
The earliest non-natural languages were not so much considered "constructed" as "super-natural" or mystical. The
Lingua Ignota, recorded in the
12th century by St.
Hildegard of Bingen is an example of this; apparently it is a form of private mystical
cant (see also
language of angels).
Kabbalistic grammatical speculation was directed at recovering the original language spoken by
Adam and Eve in
Paradise, lost in the
confusion of tongues. The first
Christian project for an ideal language is outlined in
Dante Alighieri's
De vulgari eloquentia, where he searches for the ideal Italian vernacular suited for literature.
Raymond Lull's Ars magna was a project of a perfect language with which the infidels could be convinced of the truth of the Christian faith. It was basically an application of
combinatorics on a given set of concepts. During the
Renaissance, Lullian and Kabbalistic ideas were carried
ad absurdum in a
magical context, resulting in
cryptographic applications. The
Voynich manuscript may be an example of this. Renaissance interest in
Ancient Egypt, notably the discovery of the
Hieroglyphica of
Horapollo, and first encounters with the
Chinese script directed efforts towards a perfect language of written characters.
Johannes Trithemius, in his works
Steganographia and
Polygraphia, attempted to show how all languages can be reduced to one. In the
17th century, interest in
magical languages was continued by the
Rosicrucians and
Alchemists (like
John Dee).
Jakob Boehme in
1623 spoke of a "natural language" (
Natursprache) of the senses.
Musical languages from the Renaissance were tied up with
mysticism, magic and
alchemy, sometimes also referred to as the
language of the birds. The
Solresol project of
1817 re-invented the concept in a more pragmatic context.
The 17th century also saw the rise of projects for "philosophical" or "a priori" languages. Pioneered by
Francis Lodwick's
A Common Writing (
1647) and
The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing (
1652),
George Dalgarno (
Ars signorum,
1661) and
John Wilkins (
Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language,
1668) produced systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression.
Gottfried Leibniz with
lingua generalis in
1678 pursued a similar end, aiming at a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically, as a side-effect developing
binary calculus. These projects were not only occupied with reducing or modelling grammar, but also with the arrangement of all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies, an idea that with the
Enlightenment would ultimately lead to the
Encyclopédie.
Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally in a tree diagram, and consequently to construct an
a priori language based on such a classification of concepts. Under the entry
Charactère,
D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century. From the
Encyclopédie, projects for
a priori languages moved more and more to the lunatic fringe. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early
20th century (e.g.
Ro), but most recent
engineered languages have had more modest goals; some are limited to a specific field, like mathematical formalism or calculus (e.g.
Lincos and
programming languages), others are designed for eliminating syntactical ambiguity (e.g.,
Loglan and
Lojban) or maximizing conciseness (e.g.,
Ithkuil,
Ygyde).
Already in the
Encyclopédie attention began to focus on
a posteriori auxiliary languages.
Joachim Faiguet in the article on
Langue already wrote a short proposition of a "laconic" or regularized grammar of
French. During the
19th century, a bewildering variety of such International Auxiliary Languages (IALs) were proposed, so that
Louis Couturat and
Leopold Leau in
Historire de la langue universelle (
1903) could review 38 projects. The first of these that made any international impact was
Volapük, proposed in
1879 by
Johann Martin Schleyer, and within a decade, 283 Volapükist clubs were counted all over the globe. However, this language by its very success lost its unity, and within a few years, fell into obscurity, making way for
Esperanto, proposed in
1887 by
Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof, the most successful IAL to date.
Loglan (
1955) and its descendants constitute a pragmatic return to the aims of the
a priori languages, tempered by the requirement of usability of an auxiliary language.
Artistic languages, constructed for literary enjoyment or aesthetic reasons without any claim of usefulness, begin to appear in Early Modern literature (in
Pantagruel, and in
Utopian contexts), but they only seem to gain notability as serious projects from the
20th century.
A Princess of Mars by
Edgar Rice Burroughs was possibly the first fiction of the 20th century to feature a constructed language.
J. R. R. Tolkien was the first to develop a family of related fictional languages and was the first academic to publicly discuss artistic languages, admitting to
A Secret Vice of his in
1930 at an Esperanto congress. (
George Orwell's
Newspeak should be considered a parody of an IAL rather than an artistic language proper.)
By the turn of the
21st century, it had become common for science-fiction and fantasy works set in other worlds to feature constructed languages, and constructed languages are a regular part of movies of the genre, including
Star Wars,
Star Trek,
Stargate SG-1 and
Atlantis: The Lost Empire.
Most constructed languages have been created by a single person. A few, however, have been created by a group, and this has apparently become more common in recent years as constructed language designers have started using Internet tools to coordinate design efforts. NGL/
Tokcir [
1] was an early Internet collaborative engineered language whose designers used a mailing list to discuss and vote on grammatical and lexical design issues. More recently,
The Demos IAL Project is developing an
international auxiliary language with similar collaborative methods. Several
artistic languages have been developed on different constructed language
wikis, usually involving discussion and voting on phonology, grammatical rules and so forth. An interesting variation is the corpus approach, exemplified by
Madjal and more recently
Kalusa, where contributors simply read the corpus of existing sentences and add their own sentences, perhaps reinforcing existing trends or adding new words and structures. The Kalusa engine adds the ability for visitors to rate sentences as acceptable or unacceptable. There is no explicit statement of grammatical rules or explicit definition of words in this corpus approach; the meaning of words is inferred from their use in various sentences of the corpus, perhaps in different ways by different readers and contributors, and the grammatical rules can be inferred from the structures of the sentences that have been rated highest by the contributors and other visitors.
*
List of constructed languages*
Universal language* Language construction
**
CONLANG,
conlanger**
Language regulator**
Language Construction Kit**
Language game (linguistics)**
Artificial script* Language modelling and translation
**
Language translation**
Knowledge representation**
Translation relay**
Universal grammar**
Metalanguage* Prescriptive grammar
**
Language planning**
Linguistic protectionism**
List of language regulators**
Spelling reform**
Pāṇini**
Duden,
German spelling reform of 1996* Spontaneous emergence of grammar
**
Origin of language**
Pidgin**
Poto and Cabengo**
June and Jennifer Gibbons* Mystical languages
**
Glossolalia**
Language of the birds* Works in constructed languages
**
Literature in constructed languages**
Movies in constructed languages**
Songs in constructed languages*
Alan Libert,
A Priori Artificial Languages.
Lincom Europa, Munich,
2000. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
*
Umberto Eco,
The search for the perfect language,
1993.
Scholarship
*
Audience, Uglossia, and CONLANG: Inventing Languages on the Internet by Sarah L. Higley. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture 3.1 (2000).
*
Language Arts Outpost preserves several articles from the paper zine
Journal of Planned Languages*
The Language Lab, Rick Harrison's site, also reprints several such articles on specific languages
Real life classes / events on conlangs
*
Spring 2005 and Spring 2006 UC Berkeley Conlangs DE-Cal (and its recorded videos, on
archive.org and
video.google.com)
*
List of Esperanto university classes worldwide (in Esperanto)*
Language Creation ConferenceCommunities
*
The CONLANG Mailing List*
LiveJournal Conlangs community*
Zompist Bulletin Board - a highly active online forum devoted to conlangs (and conworlds in general)
*
Conlanger.com - A multilingual forum and link collection for conlanging
*
The Petaylish Forum - A forum for Petaylish and linguistics in general.
* [irc://irc.efnet.net/ConLang #ConLang] - The IRC channel #ConLang on EFNet
How to
*
The Language Construction Kit*
How to Create a Language by
Pablo David Flores, inspired by the Language Construction Kit; covers some overlooked topics
**
Cómo crear un lenguaje -
Spanish language version
*
Langmaker: ConLangs and neologisms forumLink collections
*
Conlang Profiles at Langmaker.com - over 1,000 languages listed, frequently updated
*
A Constructed Languages Library*
The Conlang Yellow Pages*
Blueprints For Babel*
Garrett's Links to Logical Languages*
Department of Planned Languages and Esperanto Museum of the
Austrian National LibraryWikis on or about constructed languages
*
CBBwiki*
Conlang Wikia - "Conlang Free City"
*
ConlangWiki - a wiki devoted to the topics of ConLangs and ConCultures.
*
FrathWiki*
IAL Wiki - a wiki for the Auxlang community
*
Unilang.org - a database of language- and linguistic-related information
*
Hahn aren sathyrrah