European Union
style="font-size: larger;"| European Union
| Flag of the European Union | Flag of the European Union |
Motto: (Latin for "United in diversity") |
Anthem: Ode to Joy (orchestral)| | | EU institution sites | Brussels (CoEU, EC, and EP) Frankfurt am Main (ECB) Luxembourg (ECoJ and ECoA) Strasbourg (2nd EP) | | Monetary authority | European Central Bank| Administrative centre | Brussels (de facto capital) | | Largest cities | Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome (in alphabetical order) | | Member states | 25 member states | | Official languages | 20 official languages
| | Presidencies |
|---|
| European Council | Matti Vanhanen | | Council of the EU | Finland | | European Commission | José Manuel Durão Barroso | | European Parliament | Josep Borrell Fontelles | | History |
|---|
| Europe Day | May 9, 1950 | Formation as EEC - Signed - Enforced | Treaty of Rome - March 25, 1957 - January 1, 1958 | Formation as EU - Signed - Enforced | Maastricht Treaty - February 7, 1992 - November 1, 1993 | | Statistics |
|---|
Area - Total | 7th if ranked 3,976,372 km² 1,5352,86 sq mi | Population - Total (2006) - Density | 3rd if ranked 457,514,494 115.6 people/km² 299.4 people/sq mi | GDP (PPP, 2005) - Total - Per capita | 1st if ranked $12,427,413 million $28,100 | | HDI (2003) | 0.922 (est.) (22nd if ranked) " high | | Other information |
|---|
| Currencies | Euro (EUR or €) Other currencies: British pound (GBP or GB£) Cyprus pound (CYP or C£) Czech koruna (CZK or Kč) Danish krone (DKK or kr) Estonian kroon (EEK or kr) Hungarian forint (HUF or Ft) Latvian lats (LVL or Ls) Lithuanian litas (LTL or Lt) Maltese lira (MTL or Lm) Polish złoty (PLN or zł) Slovak koruna (SKK or Sk) Slovenian tolar (SIT) Swedish krona (SEK or kr) | | Time zone | UTC 0 to +2 | | Internet TLD | .eu | | Calling codes | Not standardized | | Official Website | http://europa.eu/ | See other official names "The symbols of the EU", Europa. Only for Eurozone members and EU institutions Not de jure - Brussels is unofficialy referred to as The Capital of the European Union because it is the hub of EU institutions: it hosts the European Commission, the European Council, and the European Parliament. If counted as a single unit. Total: According to IMF Estimations & Reports for 2005; Per capita: According to the CIA World Factbook [https://cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ee.html#Econ]. Estimated using members' HDI, and weighted by estimated current population. Would be 9th if member states were not counted. +1 to +3 during DST; French overseas départements, UTC −4 to +4 Plans for a EU-wide +3 prefix were abandoned. The European Telephony Numbering Space, +388 3 is somewhat similar. Current members' codes begin with either +3 or +4. | | |
|
The constitutional treaty as signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 by representatives from all EU Member States |
The
European Union (
EU) is an
intergovernmental and
supranational union of 25
democratic member states. The European Union was established under that name in 1992 by the Treaty on European Union (the
Maastricht Treaty). However, many aspects of the Union existed before that date through a series of predecessor relationships, dating back to 1951.
["Panorama of the European Union", Europa. Retrieved 20 May 2006.] The aim of the EU is create a political and economic alliance of European countries, whilst respecting the diversity of cultures within Europe, although this point is contended by certain sceptics.
The Union currently has a common
single market consisting of a
customs union, a
single currency managed by the
European Central Bank (so far adopted by 12 of the 25 member states), a
Common Agricultural Policy, a common trade policy, and a
Common Fisheries Policy.
[Activities of the EU — Internal market, Europa. Retrieved 20 May 2006.] A
Common Foreign and Security Policy was also established as the second of the
three pillars of the European Union. The
Schengen Agreement abolished passport control, and customs checks were also abolished at many of the EU's internal borders, creating a single space of mobility for
EU citizens to live, travel, work and invest.
["Abolition of internal borders and creation of a single EU external frontier", Europa. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]The most important EU institutions include the
Council of the European Union, the
European Commission, the
European Court of Justice, the
European Central Bank and the
European Parliament. The European Parliament's origins go back to the 1950s and the founding treaties, and since 1979 its members have been elected by the people they represent. Every five years elections are held in which registered EU citizens may vote.
The European Union's activities cover all areas of public policy, from
health and
economic policy to
foreign affairs and
defence. However, the extent of its powers differs greatly between areas. Depending on the area in question, the EU may therefore resemble a
federation (e.g. on monetary affairs, agricultural, trade and environmental policy, economic and social policy), a
confederation (e.g. on home affairs) or an
international organisation (e.g. in foreign affairs).
The members of the European Union have transferred to it considerable
sovereignty, more than that of any other non-sovereign
regional organisation. As has been mentioned, in certain areas the EU begins to take on the character of a
federation or
confederation. However, in legal terms, member states remain the
masters of the Treaties, which means that the Union does not have the power to transfer additional powers from states onto itself without their agreement through further international treaties. Further, in many areas member states have given up relatively little national sovereignty, particularly in key areas of national interest such as foreign relations and defence. Because of this unique structure most simply classify the European Union as a
sui generis entity and leave it at that.
On
October 29,
2004, EU member state heads of government and state
signed the
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. This has been ratified by 13 member states and is currently awaiting ratification by the other states. However, in most cases ratification was based on parliamentary action, rather than popular vote, and the process faltered on
May 29 2005 when the majority of French voters rejected the constitution in a referendum by 54.7%.
The French rejection was followed three days later by a
Dutch one on
June 1 when in the
Netherlands 61.6% of voters refused the constitution as well.
[ ]The current and future status of the European Union therefore continues to be subject of political controversy, with widely differing views both within and between member states. For example, in the
United Kingdom one poll suggested that around 50% of the population are indifferent to the European Union and 20% voted for parties that wanted to withdraw from the EU in the 2004 EU elections
[http://www.europarl.org.uk/guide/Gelectionsmain.html]. However, other countries are more in favour of European integration — soon after the Netherlands and the French voted "no" on the constitution, the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg voted "yes." What the term "
European integration" itself means is also the subject of much debate.
Issues currently facing the EU cover its membership, structure, procedures and policies. They include the status and future of the new
constitutional treaty;
enlargement to the south and east; problems of financial probity and
democratic accountability; relative economic viability; revision of the rules of the
Stability and Growth Pact; and the future budget and the
Common Agricultural Policy.
At the December 2005 European Council, which is a semi-annual meeting of EU member states'heads of state and government, EU member states decided on how it should allocate the EU budget for the next seven years (2007–2013). Also, the "
Financial Perspective" was defined as EU members agreed to fix the common budget to 1.045% of the
European GDP.
["Financial Perspective 2007-2013", Council of the European Union, 17 December 2005. Retrieved 20 May 2006. ] UK Prime Minister
Tony Blair agreed to review the
British rebate, negotiated by
Margaret Thatcher in 1984, despite a promise to the contrary made to the UK Parliament. French President
Jacques Chirac declared that this increase in budget will permit Europe to "finance common policies" such as the
Common Agricultural Policy or the
Research and Technological Development Policy. However, France's demand to lower the
VAT in catering was refused.
["Poles block EU deal on lower VAT", Times Online, 31 January 2006. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]Issues controversial during upcoming budget debates include the
British rebate, France's benefits from the
Common Agricultural Policy, Germany and the Netherlands' large contributions to the EU budget, and reform of the
European Regional Development Funds.
Many commentators have envisaged these debates to yield a major split between governments such as France and Germany, who call for a broader budget and a more federal union, and governments such as that of the UK, who demanded a slimmer budget with more funding transferred to science and research (and whose watchword is
modernisation).
The
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (TCE), commonly referred to as the European Constitution, is an international
treaty intended to create a
constitution for the European Union. The failure of the constitution to win popular support in some member states (France and Netherlands
["Varied reasons behind Dutch 'No'", BBC News, 1 June 2005. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]) caused other countries to postpone or halt their ratification procedures, and the Constitution now has a highly uncertain future.
["Q&A: EU constitution's future", BBC News, 10 May 2006. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]["EU admits constitution is on ice", BBC News, 21 September 2005. Retrieved 20 May 2006.] Had it been ratified, the treaty would have entered into force on
November 1,
2006. However, as of May 2006,
Austria,
Belgium,
Cyprus,
Estonia,
Germany,
Greece,
Hungary,
Italy,
Latvia,
Lithuania,
Luxembourg,
Malta,
Slovakia,
Slovenia and
Spain had ratified the constitutional treaty.
["EU constitution: Where member states stand", BBC News, 9 May 2006. Retrieved 20 May 2006.] The two countries due to join the European Union in 2007,
Bulgaria and
Romania, have already accepted the constitutional treaty too, ratifying their accession treaty.
Attempts to unite the disparate nations of Europe precede the modern
nation states; they have occurred repeatedly throughout the history of Europe. Two and a half thousand years ago, Europe was dominated by the
Celts and other tribes which were not a single political entity, and then conquered and ruled by the
Mediterranean centred
Roman Empire. This early union was created by the force of one central state. The
Frankish empire of
Charlemagne and the
Holy Roman Empire united large areas under a loose administration for hundreds of years. The 1800s
customs union under
Napoleon and the 1940s conquests of
Germany had only transitory existence.
Given Europe's collections of
languages,
cultures and ethnic groups, these attempts usually involved
military subjugation of unwilling nations, leading to instability; others have lasted hundreds of years and promulgated large spells of peace and economical and technological progress as in the Roman Empire's
Pax Romana. One of the first proposals for peaceful unification through cooperation and equality of
membership was made by the
pacifist Victor Hugo in 1851. Following the catastrophes of the
First World War and the
Second World War, the impetus for the founding of (what was later to become) the European Union greatly increased, driven by the determination to rebuild Europe and to eliminate the possibility of another war. This sentiment eventually led to the formation of the
European Coal and Steel Community by
(West) Germany,
France,
Italy and the
Benelux countries. This was accomplished by the
Treaty of Paris, signed in April, 1951, and taking effect in July, 1952.
[ History of the European Union at the EUs Europa website ]The first full customs union was originally known as the
European Economic Community (informally called the
Common Market in the UK), established by the
Treaty of Rome in 1957 and implemented on
1 January 1958. This later changed to the
European Community which is now the "first pillar" of the European Union created by the
Maastricht treaty. The EU has evolved from a trade body into an economic and political partnership. As president of the
Convention on the Future of Europe, the former French president Valéry Giscard d'Estaing proposed to change the name of the European Union to United Europe but it was not adopted.
The European Union is a highly populated, culturally diverse union of 25
member states, constantly expanding and developing. Approximately 4.5 percent of the EU population is composed of
Muslim (many second and third generation) immigrants, some 20,000,000 persons. These are mainly Magrehbians from
North Africa,
Turks, and immigrants from the
Balkan states. There are small communities of
Asians and some sub-saharan populations. Over the next two decades the total population of the EU25 is expected to increase by more than 13 million inhabitants, from 456.8 million on 1 January 2004 to 470.1 million on 1 January 2025. Population growth in the EU25 until 2025 will be mainly due to net migration, since total deaths in the EU25 will outnumber total births from 2010. The effect of net migration will no longer outweigh the natural decrease after 2025, when the population will start to decline gradually. The population will reach 449.8 million on 1 January 2050, that is a decrease of more than 20 million inhabitants compared to 2025. Over the whole projection period the EU25 population will decrease by 1.5%, resulting from a 0.4% increase for the EU15 and a 11.7% decrease for the ten new Member States.
[EU25 population projection, accessed July 10, 2006 ]The European Union's 25 member states covers an area of 3,892,685
square kilometres (1,5352,86
sq mi) and has approximately 460 million inhabitants
as of December 2004 ["Too many people: Europe's population problem", Optimum Population Trust, 3 August 2005. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]. The European Union's member states combined represent the
world's largest economy by GDP, the
seventh largest territory in the world by area and the
third largest by population. The EU describes itself as a "a family of democratic European countries",
though it doesn't explicitly define "Europe" and "Europeanness".
The European Union has
land borders with 22 nations (23 if counting
Northern Cyprus).
 |
Map of EU member states, 2007 admissions and candidate countries |
The six founding members were
Belgium,
France,
West Germany,
Italy,
Luxembourg, and the
Netherlands, which established the
ECSC on
23 July 1952 and the
European Community on
25 March 1957. Since then, nineteen further states have joined in successive waves of enlargement:
| Date | Enlargement countries | | 1 January 1973 | Denmark, Ireland, United Kingdom |
| 1 January 1981 | Greece |
| 1 January 1986 | Portugal, Spain |
| 3 October 1990 | (The territory of the former German Democratic Republic as part of unified Germany also becomes part of the European Community) |
| 1 January 1995 | Austria, Finland, Sweden |
| 1 May 2004 | Cyprus1, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia |
Notes:*
Greenland, which was granted
home rule by
Denmark in 1979, left the European Community in 1985, following a referendum.
*
Bulgaria and
Romania are scheduled to become members on
1 January 2007.
* Several overseas territories and dependencies have close associations with particular EU member states, for example
Greenland, the
Isle of Man, the
Azores and
Madeira. (See
special member state territories and their relations with the EU)
*
1 European jurisdiction is not currently enforced in
Northern Cyprus.
Future enlargement and close relationships
Bulgaria and
Romania are scheduled to become members on
1 January 2007,
["EU Accessions Bill", BBC News, 27 January 2006. Retrieved 20 May 2006.] provided that they meet the
conditions for membership and that the Treaty of Accession for the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania is ratified by parliaments of member states. The treaty was signed by representatives of the EU Member States at the Abbaye de Neumünster in Luxembourg on
25 April 2005.
As of 2005, member state parliaments are taking forward its ratification. On
16 May 2006 an EU report to the European Parliament on the two states entry said that it was still possible for them to enter on schedule but listed areas in which progress had to be made to meet the target date. For Bulgaria this was principally tackling organised crime and for Romania it was in the area of food safety.
["EU entry hopefuls 'must do more'", BBC News, 16 May 2006. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]Croatia is an official candidate country to join and started accession negotiations in
October 2005. In June
2006, the EU officials projected that the accession of Croatia would likely happen in
2010. The closure of negotiations for all chapters of the
acquis communautaire is expected in
2008 or
2009, while signing the Accession treaty would happen in the year after.
Turkey is an official candidate to join the European Union. Turkish European ambitions date back to 1963 Ankara Agreements. Turkey started preliminary negotiations on
3 October 2005. However, analysts believe 2015 is the earliest date the country can join the union due to the plethora of economic and social reforms it has to complete, and the fact that the 2007-2013 budget takes no account of the considerable costs Turkey's accession will involve.
["Q&A: Turkey's EU entry talks", BBC News, 4 October 2005. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]Republic of Macedonia has been given official candidate status
as of December 2005 under the name "
former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia".
[" The EU and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", Opinion by the Commission on the application from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for membership of the European Union, 09 November 2005.]The
EFTA states of
Iceland,
Liechtenstein and
Norway are members of the
European Economic Area which allows them to participate in most aspects of the EU single market without joining the EU.
Switzerland, the fourth EFTA state, rejected EEA membership in a referendum; however, it has established close ties to the EU by means of bilateral treaties.
Context — rationale for enlargement and future prospects
Supporters of the European Union argue that the growth of the EU is a force for
peace and
democracy. They argue that the wars which were a periodic feature of the history of Western Europe have ceased since the formation of the European Economic Community (which later became the EU) in the 1950s. They also claim that in the early 1970s, Greece, Portugal and Spain were all
dictatorships, but the desire of the business communities in these three countries to be in the EU created a strong impetus for democracy there. Others argue that peace in Europe since World War II is more due to other causes, such as the moderating influence of the USA and NATO, the need for a unified response to the threat from the
Soviet Union, a need for reconstruction after
World War II, and a collective temporary tiring of waging war, and that the dictatorships cited came to an end for totally different reasons.
In more recent times, the European Union has been extending its influence to the east. It has accepted several new members that were previously behind the
Iron Curtain, and has plans to accept several more in the medium-term. It is hoped that in a similar fashion to the entry of Spain, Portugal and Greece in the 1980s, membership for these states will help cement economic and political stability.
As the EU continues to enlarge eastward, the candidate countries' accessions tend to grow more controversial. As previously explained, the EU has finished accession talks with Bulgaria and Romania, and set an entry date for the two countries in 2007. However, the rejection of the EU Constitution by France and the Netherlands, and the EU's slow economic growth, have cast some doubt on whether the EU will be ready to accept new members after 2007, when Romania and Bulgaria are set to join EU (in early 2005 they signed the Accession Treaty).
EU institutions and bodies
The functioning of the European Union is supported by the five institutions, as enumerated in the
Maastricht Treaty:
*The
European Parliament (732 members
750 max.)
*The
Council of the European Union (or 'Council of Ministers') (25 members)
*The
European Commission (25 members)
*The
European Court of Justice (incorporating the
Court of First Instance) (25 judges (& 25 judges of CFI))
*The
European Court of Auditors (25 members)
The
European Council, which is a regular meeting of the 25 head of member states and the European Commission president is sometimes also listed as an institution, although since it lacks its own staff, budget and the legal powers held by the above 5 institutions, it is better described as a "quasi-institution".
There are two financial bodies
[None of these bodies are "institutions" in the technical sense of the EU treaty, but they have many of the same powers]:
*
European Central Bank (which alongside the national
Central Banks, composes the
European System of Central Banks)
*
European Investment Bank (including the
European Investment Fund)
There are also two
advisory committees to the institutions:
*
Committee of the Regions, advising on regional issues
*
Economic and Social Committee, advising on economic and social policy (principally relations between workers and employers)
There are also a great number of bodies, usually set up by
secondary legislation, which exist to implement particular policies. These are the
agencies of the European Union. Examples are the
EUROPOL (the European Police Office), the
European Environment Agency, the
European Aviation Safety Agency or the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, the
Political and Security Committee, established in the context of the
Common Foreign and Security Policy, monitoring and advising on international issues of global security.
Location of EU institutions
As soon as the European Economic Community (EEC) was established, political and legal wrangling began over where the European institutions should be located. The Member States were unable to reach agreement on where the permanent seats should be, particularly since the concept of a European district, proposed by Jean Monnet, won little support. From 1958, the Commissions of the EEC and the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or Euratom) had their seats in Brussels.
Until such time as the member states reached agreement on a single permanent seat for the Community institutions, European officials were distributed between Brussels, Luxembourg and Strasbourg, leading, in particular, to a considerable increase in overheads. Brussels was chosen as the seat of the Single Commission and the Council of Ministers. In practical terms, this meant that most European officials were employed there. Luxembourg sought compensation for the loss of the High Authority and the Special Council of Ministers of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), both of which were relocated to Brussels. However, Luxembourg became the seat for the new European Investment Bank (EIB) and was given the assurance that certain meetings of the Council of Ministers would be held there, in April, June and September. The Court of Justice, the Central Statistical Office, the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, the Advisory Committee and the financial services of the ECSC and the Secretariat of the Parliamentary Assembly also remained in Luxembourg. Meanwhile, France refused to renounce its claim for Strasbourg as seat of the Parliamentary Assembly. An expensive and inconvenient compromise was reached whereby Parliament's Members met in plenary session in Strasbourg but meetings of parliamentary committees were held in Brussels. Certain plenary meetings were also held in Luxembourg, which was also the seat of the Secretariat of the European Parliament.
The EU has no official capital and its institutions are divided between several cities:
*
Brussels — considered the
de facto capital of the EU, being the seat of the
European Commission and the
Council of the European Union. It is also the venue of the
European Parliament's committee meetings and mini-sessions and (since 2004) the host city for all
European Council summits.
*
Strasbourg — seat of the
European Parliament and venue of its twelve week-long plenary sessions each year. Strasbourg is also the seat of the
Council of Europe and the
European Court of Human Rights, two institutions which are separate from (and have a wider membership than) the EU.
*
Luxembourg City — seat of the
European Court of Justice, the
Secretariat of the European Parliament and the
European Investment Bank.
Legal framework
European Union law comprises a large number of overlapping legal and institutional structures. This is a result of its being defined by successive international treaties, with each new treaty amending and supplementing earlier ones. In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to consolidate and simplify the treaties, culminating with the final draft of the
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. If this proposed treaty is adopted, it will replace the set of overlapping treaties that form the current constitution of the EU with a single text.
The earliest EU treaty was the
Treaty of Paris of 1951 (took effect in 1952) which established the
European Coal and Steel Community between an original group of six European countries. This treaty has since expired, its functions taken up by subsequent treaties. On the other hand, the
Treaty of Rome of 1957 is still in effect, though much amended since then, most notably by the
Maastricht treaty of 1992, which first established the European Union under that name. The most recent amendments to the Treaty of Rome were agreed as part of the
Treaty of Accession of the 10 new member states, which entered into force on
1 May 2004.
The EU member states have recently agreed to the text of a new
constitutional treaty that, if ratified by the member states, would have become the first official constitution of the EU, replacing all previous treaties with a single document. Although accepted by many countries, this document was rejected in a French referendum with a 55% majority on
May 29 and in the Dutch referendum with a 62% majority on
June 1.
If the Constitutional Treaty fails to be ratified by all member states, then it might be necessary to reopen negotiations on it. Most politicians and officials agree that the current pre-Constitution structures are inefficient in the medium term for a union of 25 (and growing) member states. Senior politicians in some member states (notably France) have suggested that if only a few countries fail to ratify the Treaty, then the rest of the Union should proceed without them, possibly creating an "Avant Garde" or Inner Union of more committed member states to proceed with "an ever-deeper, ever-wider union".
["French No an 'unmistakable message'", BBC News, 30 May 2005. Retrieved 10 July 2006.]The role of the European Community within the Union
=European Communities: European Community plus Euratom
=
The term
European Communities refers collectively to two entities — the European Economic Community (now called the European Community) and the European Atomic Energy Community (also known as
Euratom) — each founded pursuant to a separate treaty in the 1950s. A third entity, the European Coal and Steel Community, was also part of the European Communities, but ceased to exist in 2002 upon the expiration of its founding treaty. Since 1967, the European Communities have shared common institutions, specifically the Council, the European Parliament, the
Commission and the
Court of
Justice. In 1992, the European Economic Community, which of the three original communities had the broadest scope, was renamed the "
European Community" by the Treaty of Maastricht.
=European Union: European Communities plus CFSP and PJCC
=
The European Communities are one of the
three pillars of the European Union, being both the most important pillar and the only one to operate primarily through supranational institutions. The other two "pillars" –
Common Foreign and Security Policy, and
Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters – are looser intergovernmental groupings. Confusingly, these latter two concepts are increasingly administered by the Community (as they are built up from mere concepts to actual practice).
=Effect of Constitutional Treaty
=
If it is ratified, the proposed new
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe would abolish the three-pillar structure and, with it, the distinction between the European Union and the European Community, bringing all the Community's activities under the auspices of the European Union and transferring the Community's legal personality to the Union. There is, however, one qualification: it appears that Euratom would remain a distinct entity governed by a separate treaty (due to the strong controversy the issue of nuclear energy causes, and Euratom's relative unimportance, it was considered expedient to leave Euratom alone in the process of EU constitutional reform).
 | center |
|
| Evolution of the structures of the European Union. |
|
Intergovernmentalism and supranationalism
A basic tension exists within the European Union between
intergovernmentalism and
supranationalism. Intergovernmentalism is a method of decision making in international organisations where power is possessed by the member states and decisions are made by unanimity. Independent appointees of the governments or elected representatives have solely advisory or implementational functions. Intergovernmentalism is used by most international organisations today.
An alternative method of decision making in international organisations is supranationalism. In supranationalism power is held by independent appointed officials or by representatives elected by the legislatures or people of the member states. Member state governments still have power, but they must share this power with other actors. Furthermore, decisions are made by majority votes, hence it is possible for a member state to be forced by the other member states to implement a decision against its will.
Some forces in European Union politics favour the intergovernmental approach, while others favour the supranational path. Supporters of supranationalism argue that it allows integration to proceed at a faster pace than would otherwise be possible. Where decisions must be made by governments acting unanimously, decisions can take years to make, if they are ever made. Supporters of intergovernmentalism argue that supra-nationalism is a threat to national sovereignty, and to democracy, claiming that only national governments can possess the necessary democratic legitimacy. Intergovernmentalism is being favoured by more
eurosceptic nations such as the
United Kingdom,
Denmark and
Sweden; while more integrationist nations such as the
Benelux countries,
France,
Germany, and
Italy have tended to prefer the supranational approach.
["The EU's Future: The Federalism/Intergovernmentalism Debate", Big Issue Ground. Retrieved 18 July 2006.]The European Union attempts to strike a balance between the two approaches. This balance however is complex, resulting in the often labyrinthine complexity of its decision-making procedures.
Starting in March 2002, a
Convention on the Future of Europe again looked at this balance, among other things, and proposed changes. These changes were discussed at an
Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) in May 2004 and led to the Constitutional Treaty discussed above.
Supranationalism is closely related to the inter-governmentalism
vs. neofunctionalism debate. This is a debate concerning why the process of integration has taken place at all. Intergovernmentalists argue that the process of EU integration is a result of tough bargaining between states. Neofunctionalists, on the other hand, argue that the supranational institutions themselves have been a driving force behind integration.
As the changing name of the European Union (from European Economic Community to European Community to European Union) suggests, it has evolved over time from a primarily economic union to an increasingly political one. This trend is highlighted by the increasing number of policy areas that fall within EU competence: political power has tended to shift upwards from the member states to the EU.
Some member states have a domestic tradition of strong regional government. This has led to an increased focus on regional policy and the
European regions. A
Committee of the Regions was established as part of the
Treaty of Maastricht.
EU policy areas cover a number of different forms of co-operation.
*Autonomous decision making: member states have granted the
European Commission power to issue decisions in certain areas such as
competition law,
state aid control and
liberalisation.
*Harmonisation: member state laws are harmonised through the
EU legislative process, which involves the
European Commission,
European Parliament and
Council of the European Union. As a result of this
European Union law is increasingly present in the systems of the member states.
*Co-operation: member states, meeting as the
Council of the European Union, agree to co-operate and co-ordinate their domestic policies.
The tension between EU and national (or sub-national) competence is an enduring one in the development of the European Union.
All prospective members must enact legislation in order to bring them into line with the common European Union legal framework, known as the
Acquis Communautaire. (See also
European Free Trade Association (EFTA),
European Economic Area (EEA) and
Single European Sky.)
See table of states participating in some of the initiatives.Single market
Many of the policies of the EU relate to the development and maintenance of an effective
single market. Significant efforts have been made to create harmonised standards designed to bring economic benefits through creating larger, more efficient markets.
The power of the single market reaches beyond the EU borders, because to sell within the EU, it is beneficial to conform to its standards. Once a non-member country's factories, farmers and merchants conform to EU standards, much of the cost of joining the union has already been sunk. At that point, harmonising domestic laws in order to become a full member is relatively painless, and may create more wealth through eliminating the customs costs.
The single market has both internal and external aspects:
Internal policies
*
Free trade of goods and services among member states (an aim further extended to three of the four
EFTA states by the
European Economic Area, EEA).
*A common
EU competition law controlling anti-competitive activities of companies (through antitrust law and merger control) and member states (through the State Aids regime).
*The
Schengen treaty allowed removal of internal border controls and harmonisation of external controls between its member states. This excludes the UK and Ireland, which have derogations, but includes the non-EU members
Iceland and
Norway. Switzerland also voted in 2005 to become part of the Schengen zone.
*Freedom for citizens of its member states to live and work anywhere within the EU with their spouses and children, provided they can support themselves (also extended to the other EEA states and Switzerland). This has led to a gross anomaly whereby family related social welfare benefits are payable by the member state where an EU citizen is employed, even where the family of the worker are resident elsewhere in the Union.
*Free movement of
capital between member states (and other EEA states).
*Harmonisation of government regulations, corporations law and
trademark registrations.
*
Eurozone, a single currency area with the
euro (excluding the
UK and
Denmark, which have derogations).
Sweden, although not having a specific opt-out clause, has not joined the
ERM II, voluntarily excluding itself from the
monetary union.
*A large amount of environmental policy co-ordination throughout the Union.
*A
Common Agricultural Policy and a
Common Fisheries Policy.
*Common system of indirect
taxation, the
VAT, as well as common customs duties and excises on various products.
*Funding for the development of disadvantaged regions —
structural and cohesion funds, as well as the emergency financial aid — the solidarity fund.
External policies and Military
* A common external
customs tariff, and a common position in international trade negotiations.
* Funding for programmes in candidate countries and other
Eastern European countries, as well as aid to many developing countries, through programmes such as
Phare,
TACIS,
ISPA.
* The establishment of a single market energy community by means of the
Energy Community South East Europe Treaty.
* The establishment of a
single market aviation area.
* The establishment of a
European Defence Agency.
Co-operation and harmonisation in other areas
*Freedom for citizens of the EU to vote in local government and
European Parliament elections in any member state.
*Co-operation in criminal matters, including sharing of
intelligence (through
EUROPOL and the
Schengen Information System), agreement on common definition of
criminal offences and expedited
extradition procedures.
*A
common foreign policy as a future objective, however this has some way to go before being realised. The divisions between the member states (in the
letter of eight) and then-future members (in the
Vilnius letter) during the run up to the
2003 invasion of Iraq highlights just how far off this objective could be before it becomes a reality.
*A
common security policy as an objective, including the creation of a 60,000-member
European Rapid Reaction Force for
peacekeeping purposes, an EU
military staff and an EU
satellite centre (for intelligence purposes).
*Common policy on asylum and immigration.
*Common funding of research and technological development, through four-year Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development. The
Sixth Framework Programme is running from 2002 to 2006.
|
Population and GDP per capita of EU member states and candidates. |
If considered a single unit, the European Union has the largest economy in the world, with a
GDP of 12,427,413 million USD (2005) using
Purchasing power parity (PPP) equivalence. The EU economy is expected to grow further over the next decade as more countries join the
union — especially considering that the new states are usually poorer than the EU average, and have the capacity to grow at a higher rate. The
European Council published estimations on
17 November 2005 that the
economy of the European Union will have grown approximately 1.5% in 2005 (1.3% in the eurozone), and 2.3% 2006 (2.1% in the eurozone) surpassing earlier growth predictions.
[" Commission spring economic forecasts 2006-2007: growth rebounds", European Commission, 8 May 2006. Full report: "Economic Forecasts Spring 2006". . Retrieved 20 May 2006.] In 2006, it is expected 3½ million jobs will be created in the Eurozone . The European Council is hopeful that the European Union will grow further in the future; economic growth for 2007 is expected to be at 2.7%. Germany, the largest economy in the EU, will grow about: 0.8% in 2005, 1.2% in 2006 and 1.6% in 2007. After extremely slow growth, the EU's rate of growth is expected to increase in the next couple of years.
EU member states have agreed a programme called the
Lisbon Strategy which aims at making "the EU the world's most dynamic and competitive economy" by 2010.
["The Education and Training Contribution to the Lisbon Strategy", European Commission. Retrieved 20 May 2006.]Economic variation
Below is a table and three graphs showing, respectively, the
GDP (
PPP), the
GDP (PPP) per capita and the
GDP (nominal) per capita for the European Union and for each of its 25 member states, sorted by GDP (PPP) per capita. This can be used as a rough gauge to the relative standards of living among member states, with Luxembourg and Ireland the highest; Poland and Latvia the lowest. The two future members
Bulgaria and
Romania (set for
1 January 2007) are also included in the table, as are the official candidates and
officially recognised potential candidates. The data set is for the year 2006 and graphs are for the year 2004. All 2006 data are projections.
| | GDP (PPP) per capita, 2004 |
|
| GDP (PPP) per capita 2006 showing countries above and below EU average |
|
| Member States | GDP (PPP) millions of int. dollars | GDP (PPP) per capita int. dollars | GDP (nominal) per capita int. dollars |
|---|
| | 12,954,042 | 28,477 | 29,763 |
| | 33,436 | 72,945 | 76,224 |
| | 179,516 | 42,859 | 49,533 |
| | 195,788 | 36,079 | 48,530 |
| | 286,767 | 35,002 | 37,378 |
| | 171,848 | 32,822 | 36,928 |
| | 338,452 | 32,500 | 35,843 |
| | 524,035 | 32,062 | 38,323 |
| | 1,911,943 | 31,628 | 36,875 |
| | 2,605,373 | 31,572 | 33,356 |
| | 283,802 | 31,235 | 39,562 |
| | 1,900,467 | 30,322 | 33,387 |
| | 1,726,869 | 29,727 | 30,144 |
| | 1,145,078 | 27,542 | 27,815 |
| | 261,018 | 23,519 | 20,545 |
| | 46,384 | 23,250 | 17,535 |
| | 18,563 | 22,334 | 20,500 |
| | 8,103 | 20,365 | 13,847 |
| | 210,049 | 19,984 | 17,224 |
| | 198,931 | 19,478 | 12,587 |
| | 179,606 | 18,492 | 11,375 |
| | 23,927 | 17,802 | 10,342 |
| | 93,288 | 17,239 | 9,471 |
| | 52,705 | 15,443 | 8,310 |
| | 526,253 | 13,797 | 8,410 |
| | 31,841 | 13,784 | 8,401 |
| Acceding Countries: |
|---|
| ' | 76,696 | 10,003 | 3,686 |
| ' | 204,412 | 9,446 | 5,254 |
| Candidate Countries: |
|---|
| ' | 57,983 | 12,885 | 8,710 |
| ' | 609,987 | 8,385 | 5,692 |
| | 16,700 | 8,080 | 2,564 |
| Potential Candidate Countries: |
|---|
| ' | 25,505 | 6,800 | 2,561 |
| ' | 41,150 | 5,208 | 3,183 |
| ' | 18,329 | 5,107 | 2,441 |
| ' | 2,412 | 3,800 | 1,784 |
Source: CIA World Factbook [https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ee.html]All other figures, source: IMF web site (2006 GDP PPP, 2006 per capita GDP PPP, 2006 per capita GDP, current prices). *
Economics: Causes of Growth Differentials in the EULanguage barriers
One major criticism of the EU, is the fact that the EU has 20 official languages for 25 member states (some members share languages). This results in a potential 380 interpretations needed to translate all statements between all the languages of the EU. Everyone in the European Parliament is entitled to communicate in their own native language and have this interpreted into other languages.
The European Parliament employs over 4000 interpreters at a cost of almost one billion euros, and translations can take up to a week to be translated into the languages of all member states. One of the problems is that sometimes translating needs to be done across intermediate languages, due to a lack of interpreters between certain languages (e.g. Greek-Danish, Portuguese-Greek) which can often lead to a loss of information and clarity, or even worse, errors in the translation.
["On Communication", 2-2, Retrieved 3 August 2006.]Common Agricultural Policy
The
Common Agricultural Policy, better known as the CAP, is a system of subsidies paid to EU farmers. Its main purposes are to guarantee minimum levels of production, so that Europeans have enough food to eat, and to ensure a fair standard of living for those dependent on agriculture.
The policy costs around £30bn a year - or half the EU's £60bn annual budget. Common attempts to put the finances into some sort of perspective include examples along the lines of it adding £9 onto a family of four's weekly food bill, or that the annual income of an EU dairy cow exceeds that of half the world's human population. Another problem is that the subsidies cause overproduction. The CAP has also been blamed for encouraging environmentally damaging intensive farming. Critics say that the CAP has become badly unbalanced, with 70% of its funds going to only 20% of Europe's farms - predominantly the largest - and leaves nearly three-quarters of EU farmers surviving on less than £5,000 a year. Small farmers account for about 40% of EU farms, but receive only 8% of available subsidies from Brussels. For example, according to British government figures, five UK farms receive more than £1m a year in subsidies.
France led the anti-reform camp, which includes Spain, the Republic of Ireland and possibly Germany, while Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands were demanding change.
Note: It must be noted that The European Union (EU) is not simply a regional bloc in the common sense. The EU is a Union of sovereign States with the deepest connections in the political, economical and executive fields. Thus, it is a far more integrated bloc than any other regional bloc or cooperative association of sovereign States in the world.Lists
*
:Category:European Union (hierarchical list of all EU articles)
*
European Union Statistics*
Statistics relating to the EU enlargement*
Largest cities of the European Union by population*
List of European Union-related topics*
EU Framework Program for Research and Technological Development*
List of EU states by populationOther
*
Euro*
Citizenship of the European Union*
Concours (Recruitment to EU institutions)
*
Economy of Europe*
Economy of the European Union*
European integration*
European Union as an emerging superpower*
Pro-European and
Euroscepticism*
Transatlantic relations*
United States of Europe*
European Union legislative procedure*
Council of Europe*
Europe*
European Union Microsoft antitrust caseThe Economist Guide to the European Union (Profile Books 2005) ISBN 1861979304
Guide to European Policies by Nicholas Moussis (European Study Service, 2005 - 11th ed.) ISBN 2930119403
Europe Recast: A History of European Union by Desmond Dinan (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004) ISBN 0333987349
Understanding the European Union 2nd ed by John McCormick (Palgrave Macmillan, 2002) ISBN 033394867X
The Institutions of the European Union edited by John Peterson, Michael Shackleton (Oxford University Press, 2002) ISBN 0198700520
The Government and Politics of the European Union by Neill Nugent (Palgrave Macmillan, 2002) ISBN 0333984617
The European Union: A Very Short Introduction by John Pinder (Oxford, 2001) ISBN 0192853759
The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the end of American Supremacy by T.R. Reid (Penguin Press, 2004) ISBN 1594200335
This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair by
Hugo Young (Macmillan, 1998) ISBN 0333579925
The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream by Jeremy Rifkin (Jeremy P. Tarcher, 2004) ISBN 1585423459
The Great Deception: The Secret History of the European Union by Christopher Booker, Richard North (Continuum International Publishing Group — Academi, 2003) ISBN 0826471056
* '
The Ultimate EU Test Book '(John Harper Publishing, 2005)
;Official pages
*
Official EU website (Europa)**
EU institutions and other bodies**
European Commission — Maps of Europe**
Press conferences and speech audio (
MP3 and
RealAudio).
**
EUR-LEX — EU law and proposed legislation**
Green Paper on a numbering policy for telecommunications (+3 country call code proposal)**
EU Policy on China*
2006 Presidency of the European Union*
European Central Bank*
EU in the USA — EU delegation to the US
*
Official EU Recruitment '(concours)' websiteNews
*BBC News: Inside Europe guide to the changing face of the EU
*Guardian Unlimited Special Report: European Union guide and ongoing news
*welcomeurope Independent European media portal dedicated to EU funding and Eu tenders
*EurActiv.com Independent media portal dedicated to EU affairs
*café babel European current affaires online magazine, published in six languages
*ECJBlog.com, blog with daily news about the European Court of Justice
*EU News — European Union News
*European Law Monitor — Monitors and tracks EU proposals
*European Voice — Independent Weekly Newspaper on EU Affairs
*EU Observer — News website focusing on the EU
*ABHaber.com — EU Turkey News Network
*EuroNews — Multilingual public TV news channel;Institutes and advocacy
*
Center for European Integration Studies (
ZEI) — Research Institute focusing on the EU
*
EUFPC European Foreign Policy Council — Interdisciplinary Think-tank and Network
*
S.C. European Society — Oxford University (1950s) World's oldest?
*
Dadalos, International UNESCO Education Server for Civic, Peace and Human Rights Education: Basic Course on the EU
*
Democracy in Europe Anti-EU site
Economy
*European Central Bank: Statistics pocket book
*Is the US a Good Model for Reducing Social Exclusion in Europe? August 2006
*EU versus USA — Study comparing GDP and growth (available in PDF)
*OECD's EU country page and OECD's Economic Survey of the EU;History
*
EU History site*
History and institutions of the united Europe since 1945 — European Navigator
Directory categories
*Yahoo — European Union directory category
*Open Directory Project — European Union directory category
*Google Pages — Europe Marketplace European trade contacts and news.;Other
*[https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ee.html CIA World Factbook entry]
*
Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports regarding the European Union
*
EU Recruitment exams ("concours") test book*
Online EU Recruitment exam ("concours") simulation and study materials*
EU Concours — online learning resource and test simulation centernds-nl:Europese Uniefiu-vro:Õuruupa Liit