Hunting
|
A hunter on horseback shoots at deer or elk with a bow. |
Hunting is the practice of pursuing
animals to capture or kill them for
food,
recreation, or
trade in their products. In modern use, the term refers to regulated and legal hunting, as distinguished from
poaching, which is the killing, trapping or capture of animals contrary to law. Hunted animals are referred to (and often protected by law) as
game animals, and are usually large
mammals or migratory
birds. The killing of other humans is most often called
execution (judicial),
homicide (illegal),
genocide (an entire people or culture) or
war (legalized, between political parties).
By definition, hunting strictly speaking excludes the killing -though the same techniques may be used- of individual animals that have become dangerous to humans and the killing of non-game animals,
domestic animals, or
vermin (or "varmints") as a means of
pest control. Hunting may be a component of modern
wildlife management, but is only a portion, sometimes used to help maintain a population of healthy animals within an environment's ecological
carrying capacity. Wildlife managers are frequently part of hunting regulatory and licensing bodies, where they help to set rules on the number, manner and conditions in which game may be hunted or "harvested." Please note that any licensed hunter that "breaks" the laws are punnished to the fullest extent of the law.
The pursuit, capture and killing of
fish is called
fishing, which is not commonly categorized as a kind of hunting, although many hunters may also fish.
Trapping is also usually considered a separate activity. Neither is it considered hunting to pursue animals without intent to possibly kill, as in
wildlife photography or
birdwatching, or to "hunt" for
plants or
mushrooms.
Ancient roots
Before the widespread domestication of animals, hunting was a crucial component of
hunter-gatherer societies, and is a
theme of many stories and
myths, as well as many
proverbs,
aphorisms,
adages and
metaphors even today.
The persistence hunt may well have been the first form of hunting practised by
paleolithic humans. It is likely that this method of hunting evolved before humans invented missile weapons, such as the spear thrower or the bow-and-arrow. Since they could not kill their prey from a distance and were not fast enough to catch the animal, the only reliable way to kill it would have been to run it down over a long distance.
In this regard one has to bear in mind that, as hominids adapted to bipedalism they would have lost some speed, becoming less able to catch prey with short, fast charges. They would, however, have gained endurance and become better adapted to persistence hunting. The evolution of the distinctively human sweating apparatus and relative hairlessness would have given hunters an additional advantage by keeping their bodies cool in the midday heat.
During the persistence hunt an antelope, such as a kudu, is not shot or speared from a distance, but simply run down in the midday heat. Depending on the specific conditions, hunters of the central Kalahari will chase a kudu for about two to five hours over 25 to 35 km in temperatures of about 40 to 42°C. The hunter chases the kudu, which then runs away out of sight. By tracking it down at a fast running pace the hunter catches up with it before it has had enough time to rest in the shade. The animal is repeatedly chased and tracked down until it is too exhausted to continue running. The hunter then kills it at close range with a spear.
The persistence hunt is still practised by hunter-gatherers in the central Kalahari Desert in Southern Africa.
Even as
animal domestication became relatively widespread, hunting was usually a significant contributor to the human food supply, even after the development of
agriculture. The supplementary meat and materials from hunting included
protein (literally "the most important") food,
bone for implements,
sinew for cordage,
fur and
feathers for ornament, with
rawhide and
leather also used in clothing and shelter. The earliest hunting weapons would have included rocks,
spears, the
atlatl,
bow and
arrows.
The cultural and psychological importance of hunting in ancient societies is represented by deities such as the horned god
Cernunnos, or lunar goddesses of classical antiquity, Greek
Artemis or Roman
Diana.
Taboos are often related to hunting, and mythological association of prey species with a divinity could be reflected in hunting restrictions such as a 'reserve' surrounding a temple .
Euripides' tale of Artemis and Acteon, for example, may be seen as a caution against disrespect of prey or impudent boasting.
Hunting is still vital in marginal climates, especially those unsuited for
pastoral uses or agriculture.
Inuit peoples in the Arctic trap and hunt animals for clothing, and produce complicated parkas consisting of up to 60 stitched pieces capable of with-standing sub-zero temperatures. From the skins of sea mammals they may make water-proof kayaks, clothing, gloves and footwear.
With domestication of the
dog,
birds of prey and the
ferret, various forms of animal-aided hunting developed including venery (
scent hound hunting, such as
fox hunting),
coursing (
sight hound hunting),
falconry and ferreting. These are all associated with
medieval hunting; in time various dog breeds were selected for very precise tasks during the hunt, reflected in such names as
pointer and
setter.
Hunting in pastoral and agricultural societies
|
Ladies Hunting. Costumes of the fifteenth century. From a miniature in a ms. copy of Ovid's Epistles. No 7231 bis. Bibl. natle de Paris. |
Even as agriculture and animal husbandry become more prevalent, hunting often remains a part of human cultures where the environment and social conditions allow. Hunting may be used to kill animals who prey upon domestic animals or to
extirpate native animals seen as competition for resources such as water or forage.
As hunting moved from a subsistence activity to a social one, two trends emerged. One was that of the specialist hunter: rather than a general
masculine task, hunting became one of many trades pursued by those with special training and equipment.The other was the emergence of hunting as a
sport for those of a higher
social class. Here in
middle English the word "
game" finds its meaning extended from a sport to an animal which is hunted.
As
game became more of a luxury than a necessity, the stylized pursuit of it also became a
luxury. Dangerous hunting, as for lions or wild boars, usually on horseback (or from a
chariot, as in
Pharaonic Egypt and
Mesopotamia) also had function similar to
tournaments and manly sports: an honourable, somewhat competitive pastime to help the aristocracy practice skills of
war in times of peace.
|
Nobleman in Hunting Costume, preceded by his Servant, trying to find the Scent of a Stag. From a Miniature in the Book of Gaston Phoebus ("Des Deduitz de la Chasse des Bestes Sauvaiges"). Manuscript of the Fourteenth Century (National Library of Paris). |
In most parts of
medieval Europe, the upper-class (aristocracy and higher clergy) obtained as proud privilege the sole rights to hunt (and sometimes fish) in certain areas of a feudal territory. Game in these areas was certainly used as a source of food and furs, often provided via professional huntsmen; but it was also expected to provide a form of recreation for the
aristocracy. The importance of this proprietary view of game can be seen in the
Robin Hood legends, in which one of the primary charges against the outlaws is that they "hunt the King's deer".
Hunting with dogs
Although various animals have been used to aid the hunter, none has been as important as the dog. The domestication of the dog has led to a symbiotic relationship in which the dog has lost its evolutionary independence and provided aid in hunting to man in exchange for support. The modern hunting dog represents the combined efforts of generations of mankind in a way that is virtually unparalleled, except perhaps in the
cultivation of
grapes and production of
wine.
Their evolution through selective breeding from wolves which hunted for themselves to the pointer and other hunting dogs which find, identify, retrieve prey entirely in service to man is extraordinary.
Although it is largely forgotten by the modern world, the use of dogs in hunting represents a collaboration of persons over time which reaches back to the dawn of our species.
The very word for hunting in Ancient Greek,
kynègia, is derived from
kynos 'dog'. In the Ottoman empire some 33-34 of the 196
orta (companies, none under a hundred men) of the elite force of
Janissaries were
Sekban, i.e. dog guards, destined in peace time for the ruler's beloved (dog) hunting pass time.
Dogs today are employed to primarily to find and retrieve
game.
Hunting dogs allow man, with his decreased senses of smell and hearing, to pursue and kill prey that would otherwise be very difficult or dangerous to hunt.
Modern sport hunting
In time, this aristocratic type of hunting lost its roots as a source of food and supplies, while retaining its prestigious nature as a sport, ultimately adopted by the rising middle class or
bourgeoisie. Generally this also took two separate paths, recreational and trophy hunting. Although skilled recreational hunters may choose to become more selective hunters in attempts at taking a good representative animal, many people hunt not only to kill but to enjoy the outdoors in a way so few ever experience.
Since prehistory, the importance of hunting for most cultures was reflected in their religions. For example, many old (often
zoomorph) deities are either predators or prey of man.
Often a hunting ground, or the hunt for one or more species, was reserved or prohibited in the context of a temple cult.
From early Christian times, hunting, in one form or another has been forbidden to clerics. Thus the "Corpus Juris Canonici" (C. ii, X, De cleric. venat.) we sais "We forbid to all servants of God hunting and expeditions through the woods with hounds; and we also forbid them to keep hawks or falcons." The
Fourth Council of the Lateran, held under
Pope Innocent III, decreed (canon xv): "We interdict hunting or hawking to all clerics." The decree of the
Council of Trent is worded more mildly: "Let clerics abstain from illicit hunting and hawking" (Sess. XXIV, De reform., c. xii), which seems to imply that not all hunting is illicit, and canonists generally make a distinction declaring noisy (
clamorosa) hunting unlawful but not quiet (
quieta) hunting.
Ferraris (s.v. "Clericus", art. 6) gives it as the general sense of canonists that hunting is allowed to clerics if it be indulged in rarely and for sufficient cause, as necessity, utility or honest recreation, and with that moderation which is becoming to the ecclesiastical state. Ziegler, however (De episc., l. IV, c. xix), thinks that the interpretation of the canonists is not in accordance with the letter or spirit of the laws of the Church.
Nevertheless, although the distinction between lawful and unlawful hunting is undoubtedly permissible, it is certain that a bishop can absolutely prohibit all hunting to the clerics of his diocese, as was done by synods at Milan, Avignon, Liège, Cologne and elsewhere.
Benedict XIV (De synodo diÅ"ces., l. II, c. x) declared that such synodal decrees are not too severe, as an absolute prohibition of hunting is more conformable to the ecclesiastical law. In practice, therefore, the synodal statutes of various localities must be consulted to discover whether they allow quiet hunting or prohibit it altogether.
Shikar (India)
During feudal and colonial epoch on the Indian continent, hunting was a true 'regal sport' in the numerous
princely states, as many (Maha)rajas, Nawabs etcetera maintained a whole corps, attached to their court, of
shikaris, i.e. native professional hunters. Since these had to be armed (not unlike the common
lancer units; both could be mounted), they might also double as a supplementary police corps or military contingent; they would be headed by a master of the hunt, who might be styled
Mir-shikar. Often these were recruited from the normally low-ranking local tribes (e.g. pre-Aryan
Bhils in Rajasthan's premier kingdom
Mewar), because of their traditional knowledge of environment, techniques etcetera, but thus could be closer than most subjects to the ruler, who would often hunt big game (preferably the emperor of Asians wildlife, the (Bengal) tiger) in majestic style: on the back of an
elephant, often commandeering extra helpers as drivers to scare the game out of the grass or jungle till it came within gun reach. As hunting was an important princely pass-time, worthy hunting lodges were constructed (not unlike feudal Europe).
After European guests of these princes had enjoyed the honour of taking part in these elephant hunts, some colonial
Sahibs started organizing their own, and tiger numbers especially dwindled alarmingly. Later, independent republics and neighbouring Himalayan monarchies (as Nepal) acted to curb such massively disturbing 'expeditions', in the name of
conservation, although the threat of
extirpation, and of
extinction by
poaching remains real for many species and
habitats.
Safari
|
In 1977 Kenya chose to ban all hunting in favor of other tourism. |
A
safari (from
Swahili word meaning a long journey) is an overland journey (especially in
Africa).
Safari as a distinctive way of hunting was popularized by US author
Ernest Hemingway and president
Theodore Roosevelt. It is a several days or even weeks-lasting journey and camping in the
bush or
jungle, while pursuing
big game. Nowadays, it's often used to describe tours through African
national parks to watch or hunt wildlife.
Hunters are usually tourists, accompanied by professional local guide,
skinners and
porters in more difficult terrains. A special safari type is the
solo-safari where all the
license acquiring,
stalking, preparation and outfitting is done by the hunter himself. Among
trophy hunters, those who outfitted the safaris themselves would receive the greatest admiration.
On the rise, even before integral
ecotourism was, is the animal-friendly version known as
photo-safari, where the only shots aimed at wildlife come from camera lenses. The synonym
Bloodless hunt for hunting with the use of film and a still photo camera was first used by the Polish photographer
WÅ‚odzimierz Puchalski.
United Kingdom
|
Different hunting cultures in 1850's England. |
The most controversial form of hunting in the
United Kingdom is
fox hunting. Originally a form of
vermin control to protect livestock, it became a popular social activity for the upper classes in
Victorian times, and a traditional rural activity for riders and foot followers alike. The special rituals of the fox hunt and the controversy surrounding it are addressed in the articles
fox hunting and
fox hunting legislation. Some
animal welfare supporters feel that the suffering caused to foxes, horses and hounds are cruel and unnecessary, whilst proponents argue that it is a
rural tradition, culturally and economically important.
Similar to fox hunting in many ways is the chasing of
hare with
hounds.
Sight hounds such as
greyhounds may be used to run down hare in
coursing with
scent hounds such as
beagles used for
beagling, the hunting of hares on foot. Other sorts of
foxhounds may also be used for hunting
deer or
mink. Using dogs to chase wild mammals in this way was made illegal in February 2005 by the
Hunting Act 2004. Hunting
deer by foot without hounds is called
game stalking.
The
shooting of game birds, especially
pheasant and
grouse, is a popular sport in the UK, with the
British Association for Shooting and Conservation saying that over a million people per year participate in shooting (including
game shooting,
clay shooting and
target shooting)[
1]. The open season for
grouse famously begins on
August 12, the so-called
Glorious Twelfth. The definition of game in the United Kingdom is governed by the
Game Act 1831.
United States
North American hunting predates the United States by thousands of years, and many
Native American hunters retain key hunting rights through legal
treaty as part of a long, cultural tradition. In certain cases (such as the
Marine Mammal Protection Act), Federal law provides explicit protection for Native American hunting rights. This is particularly true in Alaska, where people still feed on sea and land mammals as well as fish and birds. It is common for rural
Alaska Native communities to obtain 50-90% of their daily protein from hunting.
Regulation of hunting is primarily performed by the individual
states, although additional regulations are imposed by the federal government in the case of migratory birds (such as
ducks and
geese) and
endangered species. These regulations vary widely from state to state. These regulations govern the areas, time periods, techniques and methods by which specific game animals may be harvested. Some states make a distinction between protected species and unprotected species (often
varmints) for which there are no hunting regulations. Hunters of protected species require a hunting license in all states, for which completion of a hunter safety course is a pre-requisite (although individuals over a certain age may be
grandfathered in).
Typically game animals are divided into several categories for regulatory purposes. Typical categories, along with example species, are as follows:
* Big Game:
White-tail deer,
Moose,
Elk,
Caribou,
Bear,
Big Horn Sheep* Small Game:
Cottontail,
Grey squirrel* Furbearers:
Red Fox,
Mink * Predators:
Mountain Lion,
Coyote* Upland Game Birds:
Grouse,
Chukar,
Pheasant* Waterfowl:
Mallard duck,
Canada gooseHunting big game typically requires a "tag" for each animal harvested. Tags must be purchased in addition to the hunting license, and the number of tags issued to an individual is typically limited. In cases where there are more prospective hunters than the quota for that species, tags are usually assigned by lottery. Tags may be further restricted to a specific area or "wildlife management unit". Hunting migratory waterfowl requires a "duck stamp" from the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, which is similar in concept to a tag.
Harvest of animals other than big game is typically restricted by a "bag limit" and a "possession limit". A bag limit is a maximum number of a specific animal species that an individual can harvest in a single day. A possession limit is a maximum number of a specific animal species that can be in an individual's possession at any time.
Weapons used in hunting are also typically regulated by game category, area within the state and time period. Regulations for big game hunting often specify a minimum caliber or muzzle energy for firearms. The use of
rifles is often banned in areas with high population density or limited topographic relief. Specific seasons for
bow hunting or muzzle-loading
black powder weapons are often established to limit competition with hunters using more effective weapons.
Hunting in the
United States is not associated with any particular class or culture. Current regulation of hunting within the United States goes back to the 1800's, and most modern hunters see themselves as
conservationists and sportsmen, along the lines of
Theodore Roosevelt. The
Boone and Crockett Club is an excellent example of this: founded in 1887 to discourage commercial hunting, promote conservation and the "fair chase" ethic of hunting "individual animals in a manner that conserves, protects, and perpetuates the hunted population."
Local hunting clubs and national organizations provide hunter education and help protect the future of their sport by buying land to set aside as habitat or by
lobbying in
Washington, D.C. and state capitals [
2]. Two such private organizations are
Ducks Unlimited and
Delta Waterfowl.
Each year, nearly $200 million in hunters' federal excise taxes are distributed to State agencies to support wildlife management programs, the purchase of lands open to hunters, and hunter education and safety classes. Since 1934 the sale of
Federal Duck Stamps, a required purchase for migratory
waterfowl hunters over 16 years old, has raised over $700 million to help purchase more than 5.2 million acres (20,000 km²) of habitat for the
National Wildlife Refuge System lands that support waterfowl and many other wildlife species, and are often open to hunting. States also collect monies from hunting licenses to assist with management of
game animals, as designated by law. A key task of Federal and state
park rangers and
game wardens is to enforce laws and regulations related to hunting, including species protection, hunting seasons, and hunting bans.
Varmint hunting is an American phrase for the killing of non-game animals seen as pests. While not an efficient form of pest control (poisoning and trapping are much more effective), it does provide recreation and is much less regulated. Varmint species are often responsible for detrimental effects on crops, livestock,
landscaping, infrastructure, and pets. Some animals (such as wild
rabbits or
squirrels) may be utilized for fur or meat, but often no use is made of the carcass. Which species are "varmints" depends on the circumstance and area. Common varmints include various rodents,
coyotes,
crows,
foxes,
feral cats, and feral hogs. Some animals once considered varmints are now protected, such as
wolves.
Hunting can be an important tool for
wildlife management. Hunting gives resource managers a valuable tool to control populations of some species that might otherwise exceed the carrying capacity of their habitat and threaten the well-being of other wildlife species, and in some instances, that of human health and safety [
3]. Hunting reduces the annual crop of new animals and birds to allow the remaining animals sufficient feed and shelter to survive. Some environmentalists assert that introducing appropriate
predator animals would achieve the same benefit with more efficiency and less environmental impact, but some
livestock owners disagree, seeing human killing as more explicitly selective.
An example of using hunters in wildlife management can be found in the "Snow, Blue and Ross' Goose Conservation Order 2005." [
4] The Conservation Order allows hunters, after all other waterfowl seasons are closed, to shoot an unlimited number of these species of geese. The reason for the Conservation Order is that these species have grown so numerous that they are destroying the Arctic environment which many species of animals use as breeding grounds.
Animal management authorities sometimes rely on hunting to control certain animal populations. These hunts are sometimes carried out by professional hunters although other hunts include amateurs. Overpopulations of
deer in urban parks might be hunted by animal management authorities.
Historical, subsistence and sport hunting techniques can differ radically, with modern hunting regulations often addressing issues of where, when and how hunts are conducted. Techniques may vary depending on government regulations, a hunter's personal ethics, local custom, weapons and the animal being hunted. Often a hunter will use a combination of more than one technique, and some are used primarily in
poaching and
wildlife management, explicitly forbidden to sport hunters.
*
Baiting is the use of decoys, lures, scent or food to attract animals
*
Blind or Stand hunting is waiting for animals from a concealed or elevated position
*
Calling is the use of animal noises to attract or drive animals
*
Camouflage is the use of visual concealment (or scent) to blend with the environment
*
Dogs may be used to help flush, herd, drive, track, point at, pursue or retrieve prey
*
Driving is the herding of animals in a particular direction, usually toward another hunter in the group
*
Flushing is the practice of scaring animals from concealed areas
*
Glassing is the use of optics (such as binoculars) to more easily locate animals
*
Scouting includes a variety of tasks and techniques for finding animals to hunt
*
Spotlighting is the use of artificial light to find or blind animals before killing
*
Stalking is the practice of walking quietly, often in pursuit of an identified animal
*
Still Hunting is the practice of walking quietly in search of animals
*
Tracking is the practice of reading physical evidence in pursuing animals
*
Trapping is the use of devices (snares, pits, deadfalls) to capture or kill an animal
|
Úsov Château, the Czech Republic, contains a large collection of tropheys acquired by Liechtensteins in their hunting expeditions in Europe, Africa and Asia. |
In the
1800s southern and central European hunters often pursued game only for a
trophy, usually the head or pelt of an animal, to be displayed as a sign of prowess. The rest of the animal was often wasted. In contrast, in relatively scarcely populated northern Europe, hunting has remained the tradition of the common people, and still serves a purpose as a means of acquiring meat, although the standard of living does not require it. Eating game is generally considered a healthier and more ethical alternative to the exploitation of farmed animals. In the
Nordic countries, hunting for trophies was, and still is, frowned upon, but an impressive trophy is considered a bonus. This is perhaps the most common practice of modern hunters worldwide.
Trophy hunting is the most controversial aspect of hunting for opponents of hunting, who argue that modern economics or
vegetarianism should eliminate the need for most killing of animals, if not
animal domestication entirely. They see such killing as an issue of
morality, citing British
fox hunting as an especially inhumane "
blood sport."
Hunting in North America in the 1800s was done primarily as a way to supplement food supplies. The
safari method of hunting was a development of sport hunting that saw elaborate travel in Africa, India and other places in pursuit of trophies. In modern times,
trophy hunting persists, but is frowned upon by some when it involves rare or
endangered species of animal. Other people also object to trophy hunting in general because it is seen as a senseless act of killing another living thing for recreation, rather than food.
Advocates of trophy hunting disagree. They note that modern regulations explicitly address issues of unnecessary harassment and that the vast majority of the edible portions of the animal are consumed by the hunters themselves or given to local inhabitants. This along with fees paid to hunt contribute to the local economy and provide value to animals that would otherwise be seen as competition for grazing, livestock, and crops [
5].
A variety of
industries benefit from hunting, and support hunting on economic grounds, beyond the ecological arguments of hunter-gathering and pastoral use of marginal habitats.
In Tanzania it is estimated that a safari hunter spends 50-100 times that of the average eco-tourist, and at a lower environmental impact. The average photo tourist often demands luxury accommodations and at a higher number of visitors to make the endeavor financially viable. In contrast, the average safari hunter travels on foot, staying in tented camps and in vastly smaller numbers. Safari hunters are also more likely to use remote areas, uninviting to the average eco-tourist. They argue that these hunters allow for anti-poaching activities and revenue for local communities [
6].
In the United Kingdom the game hunting of birds as an industry is said to be extremely important to the rural economy: The
Cobham Report of
1997 suggested it to be worth around
£700 million, and hunting and shooting lobby groups now claim it to be worth over a billion.
Hunting is also a major
industry in the United States, with many companies specializing in hunting
equipment or specialty
tourism. Today's hunters come from a broad range of economic, social, and cultural backgrounds, including a significant
luxury segment. In 2001, over 13 million hunters averaged eighteen days hunting and spent over $20.5 billion on their sport.
The Outdoor Channel and
OLN are
cable television channels where programs such as
Hunter's Handbook TV teach hunting safety and showcase new hunting destinations or products such as
recreational vehicles, specialty clothing or
firearms.
In the U.S., proceeds from hunting licenses contribute to game management programs (especially at the state level) including preservation of wildlife habitat. Some organizations such as
Ducks Unlimited and the
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation provide sizeable funds to the enhancement and preservation of game animals, thereby augmenting or even exceeding government efforts. For instance, in 2004 the elk foundation reported that over a 20-year period it had preserved or improved some 4 million acres of habitat for a variety of wildlife.
Key parts of the
agricultural industry may also support hunting. A marginal ranch or farm may be converted to a private "hunting preserve" to bring in tourist revenues, for example. Within American industrial
forestry,
deer are often considered
pests, and hunters a key political ally to be used against more restrictive
environmentalists.
In addition to positive portrayals of hunting and hunters on television shows aimed at hunters, hunting is also frequently portrayed in movies and popular culture as part of a broader
social commentary.
Some of the most widespread depictions of hunting have been through
animation, particularly in movies such as the 1942 film
Bambi and through
Looney Tunes cartoons featuring
Bugs Bunny and
Elmer Fudd. Such
anthropomorphism of prey animals or "varmints" is frequently used as social
satire, with the audience intended to sympathize with the hunted animal and the socially powerful hunter portrayed as incompetent or a
macho buffoon. At the other end of the spectrum
Ted Nugent portrays the hunter as a
rock and roll iconoclast.
Hunting may also be depicted in a matter-of-fact way, as in the 1990 film
Dances with Wolves or the 1970
Little Big Man which contrast modern hunters with a romantic
noble savage. Filmed depictions of hunting by aboriginal cultures like American Indians tend to be more sympathetic. Hunting is portrayed as necessary subsistence, as is the case in many
Alaskan Bush communities today.[
7]
Varmint hunting of prairie dogs is depicted in John Ross' novel
Unintended Consequences. A favorable depiction of hunting is found in L. Neil Smith's science fiction novel
Pallas. Hunting is central to many works by
Ernest Hemingway and even used as an extended metaphor in the
new age self-help fiction of
Carlos Castaneda's
Journey to Ixtlan.
*
Big Game Hunter*
Duck Hunting*
Fishing*
Fox hunting legislation*
Hunting horn*
Trapping*
Persistence hunting*
Ornithology*
Wildlife*
World Hunting Association*
BloodyBusiness.Com, the British League Against Cruel Sports (UK)
*
Boone and Crockett Club "Fair Chase" Statement*
BushcraftWiki.com hunting article*
Hunting Safety*
Michigan based grassroots hunting, fishing and habitat forum*
Outdoors writer Don Meredith examines "fair chase"*
Safari Club International*
Safety while Hunting*
Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission as an example of state agencies*
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website*
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service statistics*
The Bragging Hunter*
BC Hunting Blog*
Ottoman Empire website- original in German *
Irish Hunting Pages*
Horse and Hound, UK based hunting magazine*
Hunting Articles
