Intellectual
An
intellectual is a person who uses his or her
intellect to work, study, reflect, speculate on, or ask and answer questions with regard to a variety of different
ideas.
There are, broadly, three modern definitions at work in discussions about intellectuals. Firstly, 'intellectuals' as those deeply involved in ideas, books, the life of the mind. Secondly, and here largely arising from
Marxism, 'intellectuals' as that recognisable occupational
class consisting of lecturers, teachers, lawyers, journalists, and suchlike. Thirdly, cultural "intellectuals", being those of notable expertise in culture and the arts, expertise which allows them some cultural authority, and who then use that authority to speak in public on other matters.
The expression "man of letters" stood, in many cultures, for what we might take to be the contemporary intellectual. The term implied a distinction between those "who knew their letters" and those who did not. The distinction thus had great weight when
literacy was not widespread. "Men of letters" were also termed literati (from the
Latin), as a group; this phrase may also refer to the 'citizens' of the
Republic of Letters.
Literati survives as a term of abuse and used in journalism.
Literatus, in the singular, is rarely found in
English - the English term is litterateur (from the
French littérateur).
Samuel Coleridge speculated early in the
nineteenth century on the concept of the
clerisy, a class rather than a type of individual, and a secular equivalent of the (
Anglican)
clergy, with a duty of upholding (national)
culture. The idea of the
intelligentsia, in comparison, dates from roughly the same time, and is based more concretely on the
status class of 'mental' or
white-collar workers.
Alister McGrath in
The Twilight of Atheism (2004) comments (p.53) that 'The emergence of a socially alienated, theologically literate, antiestablishment lay intelligentsia is one of the more significant phenomena of the social history of Germany in the 1830s', and that '... three or four theological graduates in ten might hope to find employment [in a church post]'.
From that time onwards, in
Europe and elsewhere, some variant of the idea of an intellectual class has been important (not least to intellectuals, self-styled). The degrees of actual involvement in
art, or
politics,
journalism and
education, of
nationalist or
internationalist or
ethnic sentiment, constituting the 'vocation' of an intellectual, have never become fixed. Some intellectuals have been vehemently anti-academic; at times universities and their faculties have been synonymous with intellectualism, but in other periods and some places the centre of gravity of intellectual life has been elsewhere.
One can notice a sharpening of terms, in the latter part of the nineteenth century. Just as the coinage
scientist would come to mean a professional, the
man of letters would more often be assumed to be a professional writer, perhaps having the breadth of a
journalist or
essayist, but not necessarily with the
engagement of the intellectual.
The
Dreyfus affair in
France at the end of the nineteenth century is often indicated as the time of full emergence of the
intellectual in public life; particularly as concerns the role of
Émile Zola in speaking directly on the matter. In fact the term
intellectual as we now have it became better known, from that time (and the derogatory implication sometimes attached). The use of the term as a
noun in
French has been attributed to
Georges Clemenceau in
1898.
Intellectuals have been viewed as a distinct
social class.
Often significantly contributing to the formation and phrasing of ideas, intellectuals are both creators and critics of
ideology.
In many definitions, intellectuals are sometimes perceived to remain impervious to
propaganda,
indoctrination, and
self-deception. Due to the cooption of intellectuals by the
Soviet Union, the
Third Reich and by other regimes and ideologies, the question has been raised how and why intellectuals can be vulnerable to indoctrination in spite of their perceived intelligence. Major reason for this is intellectuels constant criticism towards current ruling system, which often leads to seeking better alternatives from foreign countries models. Nowadays this can be seen by American intellectuels, such as Noam Chomsky, demanding larger public sector as in most of Europe. European intellectuels, such as Johan Norberg, on the other hand tend to critizise bloated welfare systems and demand more libertarian politics.
Strictly a doctrine about the possibility of deriving knowledge from
reason alone,
intellectualism can stand for a general approach emphasising the importance of
learning and logical thinking. As a philosophical doctrine it is usually termed
Rationalism. Criticism of this attitude, sometimes summed up as
Left Bank, caricatures intellectualism's faith in the mind and puts it in opposition to emotion, instinct, and
primitivist values in general.
In some contexts, especially
journalistic speech,
intellectual refers to academics, generally in the
humanities, especially
philosophy, who speak about various issues of social or political import. These are so-called
public intellectuals — in effect communicators.
The term masks an assumption or several, in particular on
academia, for example that intellectual work goes on generally in private, and there is a gap to society that requires bridging. In general practice intellectual as label is more consistently applied to fields related to
culture,
the arts and
social sciences than it is to working disciplines in the
natural sciences,
applied sciences,
mathematics or
engineering. Not surprisingly, in any of these fields intellectuals remain as vulnerable to
indoctrination,
self-deception, and
propaganda as the "masses," partly because they experience similar emotions, ranging from fear and anger to hope and love.
The German poet
Stefan George is an example of an intellectual who rejected and despised both the academic and too public roles for an artist, and yet was highly influential.
In ancient
China literati referred to the government officials who formed the ruling class in China for over two thousand years. They were a
status group of educated
laymen, not ordained
priests. They were not a
hereditary group as their position depended on their knowledge of writing and literature. After 200 B.C. the system of selection of candidates was influenced by
Confucianism and established its ethic among the literati.
The
Hundred Flowers Campaign in China was largely based on the government's wish for a mobilisation of intellectuals; with very sour consequences later. This is perhaps typical of a state's instrumental approach to an intellectual class.
* de Huszar, George B., ed., 1960
The Intellectuals: A Controversial Portrait. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Anthology with many contributors).
*
Johnson, Paul,
Intellectuals. Perennial, 1990, ISBN 0060916575. A highly ideological onslaught discussing
Rousseau,
Shelley,
Marx,
Ibsen,
Tolstoy,
Hemingway,
Bertrand Russell,
Brecht,
Sartre,
Edmund Wilson,
Victor Gollancz,
Lillian Hellman,
Cyril Connolly,
Norman Mailer,
James Baldwin,
Kenneth Tynan,
Noam Chomsky, and others
* Jennings, Jeremy and Kemp-Welch, Anthony, eds. (1997),
Intellectuals in Politics: From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie.
*
Furedi, Frank, 2004,
Where Have All The Intellectuals Gone?, Continuum,
*
Posner, Richard A., 2002,
Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, ISBN 067400633X.
*
Intellectual history*
Intellectual honesty*
Intellectual property*
Intellectual rigor*
Intellectual virtues*
Academia*
Academic *
Anti-intellectualism*
Hundred Schools of Thought*
Independent scholar*
Intelligentsia*
Michel Foucault's conception of a "specific intellectual"
*
La trahison des clercs*
Philistinism*
Polymath*
School of Literati*
The 2005 Global Intellectuals Poll*
A Special Supplement: The Responsibility of Intellectuals By
Noam Chomsky, February 23, 1967
** includes responses by
Arthur Dorfman,
Raziel Abelson,
Fryar Calhoun,
E.B. Murray *
U.S. News & World Report on college presidents and public intellectuals
*
The medium is English, on Timothy Garton Ash's comments on British intellectuals, at signandsight.com
*
Complete-Review.com's "Reactions to Richard Posner's Public Intellectuals"*
Posner's table of 600+ public intellectuals classified by such variables as sex, professional and disciplinary affiliation, political leaning, media affiliation, Web hits, and scholarly citations.
*
Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect magazine top 100 PIs, including a listing by discipline.