Israeli-occupied territories
 |
The Golan Heights plateau, also formerly known as the Syrian Heights, overlooking the site of the ancient city of Hippos |
The
Israeli-occupied territories is one of a number of terms used to describe areas captured by
Israel from
Egypt,
Jordan, and
Syria during the
Six-Day War of 1967. The term is generally used to refer to the
West Bank, the
Gaza Strip,
East Jerusalem, the
Golan Heights, and sometimes the
Sinai Peninsula, which was returned to Egypt as part of the
1979 Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty. The territories are also known as "the Occupied Territories," "occupied Palestinian territories," "
Palestinian territories," "disputed territories," "
Judea and Samaria and Gaza," and "
Yesha." "
Palestinian" is not applied to the
Golan Heights or the
Sinai Peninsula. The United Nations generally uses the term "the Occupied Palestinian Territory," but in the
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 passed on
November 29,
1947, the term "Samaria and Judea" was used.
The current and future political status of the territories is very controversial. Specific issues include the legality of Israeli's policy of encouraging
settlement, whether it is legitimate for Israel to
annex portions of the territories, whether Israel is legally an
occupying power according to the
Fourth Geneva Convention, and whether an
independent Palestinian state will be created in the territories.
Following the capture by Israel of these territories,
settlements of
Jewish Israelis were established within each of them. The West Bank and the Golan Heights are strategically significant to Israel, in part because they provide a significant portion of Israel's water resources, the former from its underground
aquifer, and the latter for containing many of the headwaters of the
Jordan River. Both of these territories also contain highlands that overlook Israel proper, and provide more readily defensible positions than does Israel's internationally recognized territory. The West Bank also contains many of the most important religious and historic sites of the
Land of Israel.
The Sinai Peninsula
The
Sinai Peninsula is a sparsely populated territory between the
Suez Canal and the
Gulf of Aqaba. Israel first captured the Sinai, along with the Gaza Strip, during the 1956
Suez Campaign. Israel's invasion of the Sinai was coordinated with
France and the
United Kingdom's seizure of the
Suez Canal. Pressure from the
Soviet Union and the
United States forced Israel to withdraw from both the Sinai and Gaza the next year.
After capturing the Sinai in 1967, Israel began establishing
settlements along the Gulf of Aqaba, and in the northeast portion, just below the
Gaza Strip, with plans to expand the settlement of
Yamit into a city with a population of 200,000
[The Arab-Israeli Dilemma (Contemporary Issues in the Middle East), Syracuse University Press; 3rd edition (August, 1985 ISBN 0815623402]. The actual population of Yamit, however, never exceeded 3000 [
1]. The Sinai Peninsula was returned to
Egypt beginning in 1979 under the
Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty following the 1978
Camp David Accords. Israel completed its withdrawal, including the dismantling of its settlements, in 1982. The returned territory included the only
oil resources under Israeli control.
The West Bank and the Gaza Strip
See also: Political status of the West Bank and Gaza StripJointly often referred to as the
Palestinian territories, or as "Ha-Shtachim" (
The Territories) or
Yesha —an acronym for
YEhuda, SHomron, v'Aza ("and Gaza"), the
Hebrew names of the territories— by many Israelis. Both of these territories were part of former
British Mandate of Palestine, and both have populations consisting primarily of
Arab Palestinians, including historic residents of the territories and
refugees who
lost their homes in the territory that became Israel after the
1948 Arab-Israeli War. Both were allotted to the proposed Arab state under
United Nations Partition Plan of 1947, but the
West Bank was captured by Jordan and the
Gaza Strip was captured by Egypt after the 1948 war. In 1950, Jordan
annexed the West Bank, but this was recognized only by the
United Kingdom. (
see 1949 Armistice Agreements, Green Line)
From their capture in 1967 until 1993, the majority of people living in these territories —those who are not Israeli citizens — were subject to Israeli military administration without the benefits of Israeli citizenship: in particular the right to vote in Israeli
elections. Israel retained the mukhtar (
mayoral) system of government inherited from Jordan, and subsequent governments began developing
infrastructure in Arab villages under its control. (
see Palestinians and Israeli law, International legal issues of the conflict, Palestinian economy)
Since the
Israel-Palestine letters of recognition of 1993, most of the
Palestinian population and
cities have been under the
internal jurisdiction of the
Palestinian Authority, and only partial Israeli military control although during periods of unrest, Israel has on several occasions redeployed its
troops and reinstated full military administration in various parts of the two territories. Israel has in recent years constructed a
barrier in the West Bank, separating predominantly Palestinian populated cities, villages and
refugee camps from Israel and some of its
Israeli settlements. In 2005, Israel forced all settlers to leave the Gaza Strip, demolishing all settlements (save
synagogues and the
Kutif Bloc's greenhouses, with the former destroyed afterwards by Palestinians) and
unilaterally withdrawing its forces from there. (
see Gaza Strip barrier) More recently, following the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier from an army base in the south of Israel, the Israeli army has once again taken control over the northern area in an incursion into Gaza strip.
East Jerusalem
While
East Jerusalem is considered by many to be part of the
West Bank, it is treated
separately in negotiations. The
1947 UN Partition Plan had contemplated that all of
Jerusalem would be an international city, but
Jordan captured East Jerusalem and Israel captured and annexed West Jerusalem in the
1948 Arab-Israeli war. Jordan annexed East Jerusalem along with the rest of the West Bank in 1950, but no nations gave
de jure recognition to this annexation
[UK recognition of Israel and of Jordanian annexation of the West Bank, House of Commons, April 17, 1950 - scan as PDF file].
Israel captured East Jerusalem from Jordan in the 1967
Six-Day War and in 1980 the Israeli
Knesset passed the "
Jerusalem Law" annexing East Jerusalem, but
United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 has declared this action to be in violation of
international law.
The Golan Heights
The
Golan Heights were captured from
Syria near the end of the
Six Day War, after the cease fire with
Egypt and
Jordan had been agreed upon. The status of the Golan Heights, and of the Israeli settlements established there, is seen as one of the issues preventing the signing of a
peace treaty between Israel and Syria.
Israel passed the "Golan Heights Law" in
1981, extending its laws and jurisdicions to the territory and according Israeli citizenship to the resident population. Israel has, however, avoided using the term "
annexation" to this action. The
UN Security Council rejected the provisions of this law with
Resolution 497.
Israeli governments have been reluctant to discuss returning the Golan Heights to Syria as part of a peace deal. Many of the headwaters of the
Jordan River, from which Israel draws much of its fresh water resources, lie in the Golan Heights. Also, possession of the Golan Heights is considered strategically important to Israel in terms of defense from Syrian harassment or invasion, particularly given that the Heights had been used to shell the territory below prior to the Six-Day War.
See article Status of territories captured by IsraelSee article International law and the Arab-Israeli conflictThe
United Nations Security Council (in
Resolution 446,
Resolution 465 and
Resolution 484, among others), the
High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention["Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention: Declaration" "Foundation for Middle East Peace" website. Retrieved October 5, 2005], and the
International Committee of the Red Cross["Annexe 2 - Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention: statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross" ICRC website. Retrieved October 5, 2005], have each resolved that the territories discussed in this article are occupied and that the
Fourth Geneva Convention provisions regarding occupied territories apply. In its decision on the
separation barrier, the
International Court of Justice ruled that the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem are occupied.
["Legal Consequence of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory" International Court of Justice, July 9, 2004. Retrieved October 4, 2005]The
Government of Israel in its public statements and many of Israel's citizens and supporters
dispute that the territories are occupied and claim that use of the term "occupied" in relation to
Israel's control of the areas has no basis in
international law or
history, and that it prejudges the outcome of any future or ongoing
negotiations. They argue it is more accurate to refer to the territories as "
disputed" rather than "
occupied" although they agree to apply the humanitarian provisions of the
Fourth Geneva Convention pending resolution of the dispute.
However, in recent decades the government of Israel has argued before the Supreme Court of Israel that its authority in the territories is based on the international law of "belligerent occupation", in particular the
Hague Conventions. The court has confirmed this interpretation many times, for example in its 2004 and 2005 rulings on the
separation fence.
[2004 Israeli Supreme Court ruling (RTF format)][2005 Israeli Supreme Court ruling] According to the BBC, "Israel argues that the international conventions relating to occupied land do not apply to the Palestinian territories because they were not under the legitimate sovereignty of any state in the first place."
["The Geneva Convention", Israel and the Palestinians, BBC News] Soon after the 1967 war, Israel issued a military order stating that the Geneva Conventions applied to the recently-occupied territories [
2], but this order was rescinded a few months later [
3]. Since then, Israel has argued on various grounds that the Geneva Conventions do not apply. One is that the Geneva Conventions apply only to the sovereign territory of a High Contracting Party, and therefore the Conventions do not apply since Jordan never exercised sovereignty over the region [
4] (pdf). The
travaux préparatoires of the
International Committee of the Red Cross and the interpretation of the International Court of Justice does not support this view.
The Supreme Court of Israel has several times acknowledged the existence of this debate but has so far declined to make a definitive ruling on it.
The Israel Supreme Court has argued that the Geneva Convention insofar it is not supported by domestic legislation "does not bind this Court, its enforcement being a matter for the states which are parties to the Convention". They ruled that "Conventional international law does not become part of Israeli law through automatic incorporation, but only if it is adopted or combined with Israeli law by enactment of primary or subsidiary legislation from which it derives its force" [
5] (pdf).
Al Haq, a West Bank affiliate of the
International Commission of Jurists, has asserted that "As noted in Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 'a party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty'. As such, Israeli reliance on local law does not justify its violations of its international legal obligations".[
6] Further, the Palestinian mission to the U.N. has argued
it is of no relevance whether a State has a monist or a dualist approach to the incorporation of international law into domestic law. A position dependent upon such considerations contradicts Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 which states that: "a state is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purposes of a treaty when it has undertaken an act expressing its consent thereto." The Treaty, which is substantially a codification of customary international law, also provides that a State "may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty" (Art. 27).[7]
Unlike
Israeli Arabs, the Arabs of the
West Bank and
Gaza Strip are not citizens of Israel, and are not afforded the same
political rights and freedoms or protections under
Israeli law as Israeli citizens who live in the same areas. This includes restraints on freedom of movement, no right to vote in Israel, although they can
vote for candidates in the
Palestinian National Authority (the
2005 presidential election), enjoy access to its judicial system and are allowed to issue appeals to the
Supreme Court of Israel.
*
Arab-Israeli conflict*
Arab nationalism*
Balfour Declaration*
British Mandate of Palestine*
Israeli-Palestinian conflict*
Occupation of the Gaza Strip by Egypt*
Rule of the West Bank and East Jerusalem by Jordan*
Palestine (region)
*
Palestinian territories*
Definitions of Palestine and Palestinian*
Palestinian Declaration of Independence*
State of Palestine*
Palestinian National Council*
Proposals for a Palestinian state*
Peace process in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict*
International law and the Arab-Israeli conflict*
Beirut Summit*
Zionism*
Land of Israel*
Golan Heights Law