Language isolate
A
language isolate, in the absolute sense, is a
natural language with no demonstrable genealogical (or "genetic") relationship with other living languages; that is, one that has not been demonstrated to descend from an ancestor common to any other language. They are in effect
language families consisting of a single language. Commonly cited examples include
Basque,
Ainu,
Burushaski, and
Korean, though in each case a minority of linguists claims to have demonstrated a relationship with another language (see
Dene-Caucasian,
Karasuk, and
Altaic, for example).
With context, a language isolate may be understood to be
relatively isolated. For instance,
Albanian,
Armenian, and
Greek are commonly called 'Indo-European isolates'. While part of the Indo-European family, they do not belong to any established branch, but instead form independent branches of their own. However, without such a disambiguating context, "isolate" is understood to be in the absolute sense.
Some languages became isolated in historical times, after all their known relatives became extinct. The
Pirahã language of
Brazil is one such example, the last surviving member of the
Mura family. Others, like
Basque, have been isolated for as long as their existence has been documented.
Language isolates may be seen as a special case of
unclassified languages, being languages which remain unclassified even after extensive efforts. If eventually such efforts do prove fruitful, a language previously considered an isolate may no longer be considered one; this has happened with the
Yanyuwa language of northern Australia, which has recently been placed in the
Pama-Nyungan family. Since linguists do not always agree on whether a genetic relationship has been demonstrated, it is often disputed whether a language constitutes a true isolate or not.
The term "genetic relationship" is meant in the genealogical sense of
historical linguistics, which groups most languages spoken in the world today into a relatively small number of
families, according to reconstructed descent from common ancestral languages. For example,
English is related to other
Indo-European languages and
Mandarin is related to many other
Sino-Tibetan languages. By this criterion, each language isolate constitutes a family of its own, which explains the exceptional interest that these languages have received from linguists.
It is possible, though not certain, that all languages spoken in the world today are related by descent from a single ancestral tongue. The established language families would then be only the upper branches of the genealogical tree of all languages. For this reason, language isolates have been the object of numerous studies seeking to uncover their genealogy. For instance, Basque has been compared with every living and extinct language family known, from
Sumerian to the
South Caucasian — without conclusive results.
There are some situations in which a language with no ancestor might arise. For example, if deaf parents were to raise a group of hearing children who have no contact with others until adulthood, they might develop a verbal language among themselves and keep using it later, teaching it to their children, and so on. Eventually, it could develop into the full-fledged language of a population, as has evidently happened in the case of
Nicaraguan Sign Language. Such a situation is not very likely to occur at any one time but, over the tens of thousands of years of human history plus pre-history, the likelihood of this occurring at least a few times increases. There are also
creole languages and
constructed languages such as
Esperanto which do not descend directly from a single ancestor as portrayed for most languages.
One should not confuse the concept of a language isolate with a language whose speakers are isolated in some sense, such as people who have little contact with other cultures (like the
Rapa Nui language of
Easter Island) or because they live far from regions where related languages are spoken (like the
Malagasy language of
Madagascar whose closest relatives are spoken in
Borneo). These languages are not linguistic isolates.
Neither should isolates be confused with
isolating languages, languages in which
morphemes generally exist in the form of full-fledged words, as opposed to
synthetic languages.
Caution is required when speaking of
extinct languages as isolates.
Sumerian is well known for a language so ancient, well enough to be able to recognize modern relatives if they existed. However, many extinct languages are very poorly attested, and the fact that they cannot be linked to other languages may be a reflection of our poor knowledge of them.
Etruscan, for example, is sometimes claimed to be Indo-European; although most historical linguists believe this is unlikely, it's not yet possible to demonstrate it one way or the other. Similar situations pertain to many extinct isolates of America, such as
Beothuk and
Cayuse. A language thought to be an isolate may turn out to be relatable to other languages once enough material is recovered, but material is unlikely to be recovered if a language was not written.
Below is a list of known language isolates, arranged by continent, along with notes on possible relations to other languages
or language families:
| Language | Comments | | Aquitanian | Spoken in parts of southern France and northern Spain until the Upper Middle Ages. Assumed to be an archaic form of Basque. |
| Basque | Known in its own language as Euskara; no known living relatives; found in the Basque region of France and Spain. Aquitanian is commonly regarded as related to or a direct ancestor of Basque. Some linguists have claimed similarities with various languages of the Caucasus, especially because of their ergative case system, but such resemblances are superficial, as a quarter of the world's languages are ergative. Other linguists have proposed a relation to Iberian. |
| Etruscan | Language of the ancient Etruscans in northwestern Italy; not well understood at present. Some have suggested Etruscan is in fact an Anatolian language, but better accepted is the suggestion of a Tyrrhenian family consisting of Etruscan, Lemnian, and possibly Raetic or Camunic. |
| Iberian | Extinct, not well known enough to classify. There are lexical coincidences with Basque, but it is hard to know if they are more than a result of vicinity. |
| Language | Comments | | Adai | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Texas and Louisiana, United States. |
| Atakapa | Extinct. Spoken in Texas and Louisiana, United States. A connection to the Muskogean languages is sometimes proposed. |
| Beothuk | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Newfoundland, Canada. Sometimes thought to be Algonquian. |
| Cayuse | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Oregon and Washington, United States. Too poorly known to be classified. |
| Chimariko | Extinct. Spoken in California, United States. |
| Chitimacha | Extinct. Spoken in Louisiana, United States. A connection to the Muskogean languages has traditionally been proposed. |
| Coahuilteco | Extinct. Spoken in Texas, United States and northeastern Mexico. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Cotoname | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Texas, United States and northeastern Mexico. |
| Cuitlatec | Extinct. Spoken in Guerrero, Mexico. |
| Esselen | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in California, United States. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Haida | Spoken in Alaska, United States and British Columbia, Canada. Some proposals to connect to Na-Dené languages, but these have fallen in disfavor. |
| Huave | Spoken in Oaxaca, Mexico. Part of the Penutian hypothesis when extended to Mexico, but this idea has generally been abandoned. |
| Karankawa | Extinct. Spoken in Texas, United States. Proposed member of Coahuiltecan family, later under Sapir's Hokan phylum. These hypotheses are currently disfavored. |
| Karok | Spoken in California, United States. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Kootenai | Spoken in Idaho and Montana, United States and British Columbia, Canada. |
| Maratino | Extinct, too poorly known to classify. Spoken in northeastern Mexico. |
| Naolan (Oxalan) | Extinct, too poorly known to classify. Spoken in Tamaulipas, Mexico. |
| Natchez | Extinct. Spoken in Mississippi and Louisiana, United States. Often linked to Muskogean. |
| Quileute | Spoken in Washington, United States. Last survivor of the Chimakuan family. The Mosan hypothesis is now seen as a language area. |
| Quinigua | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in northeastern Mexico. |
| Salinan | Extinct. Spoken in California, United States. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Seri | Spoken in Sonora, Mexico. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Siuslaw | Extinct. Spoken in Oregon, United States. Likely related to Coos, Alsea, possibly the Wintuan languages. Part of the Penutian hypothesis. |
| Solano language | Extinct, too poorly known to classify. Spoken in Texas, United States and northeastern Mexico. |
| Takelma | Spoken in Oregon, United States. Part of the Penutian hypothesis. A specific relationship with Kalapuyan is now rejected. |
| Tarascan | Spoken in Mexico. |
| Timucua | Extinct but well attested. Spoken in Florida and Georgia, United States. A connection with the poorly known Tawasa language has been suggested, but this may be a dialect. |
| Washo | Spoken in California and Nevada, United States. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Xinca | Spoken in eastern Guatemala. A relationship with Lenca has been proposed. |
| Yana | Extinct. Spoken in California, United States. Part of the Hokan hypothesis. |
| Yuchi | Spoken in Georgia and Oklahoma, United States. Connections to Siouan languages have been proposed. |
| Zuni | Spoken in New Mexico, United States. Connections to Penutian languages have been proposed, but is generally considered unlikely. |
| Language | Comments | | Aikaná | Spoken in Rondônia, Brazil. Arawakan has been suggested. |
| Andoque | Spoken in Colombia and Peru. Possibly Witotoan. |
| Betoi | Extinct. Spoken in Colombia. Paezan has been suggested. |
| Camsá | Spoken in Colombia. |
| Canichana | Spoken in Bolivia. A connection with the extinct Tequiraca (Auishiri) has been proposed. |
| Cayubaba | Spoken in Bolivia. |
| Cofán | Spoken in Colombia and Ecuador. Sometimes classified as Chibchan, but the similarities
appear to be due to borrowings. |
| Culle | Extinct. Spoken in Peru. Possibly related to the extinct Cholonan languages. |
| Gamela | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Maranhão, Brazil. |
| Huamoé | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Irantxe | Spoken in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Arawakan has been suggested. |
| Itonama | Spoken in Bolivia. Paezan has been suggested. |
| Jotí | Spoken in Venezuela. Also known as Yuwana. |
| Karirí | Extinct. Spoken in Paraíba, Pernambuco, and Ceará, Brazil. Likely demonstration of being Macro-Gê. |
| Kukurá | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Mato Grosso, Brazil. |
| Mapudungu | Spoken in Chile and Argentina. Also known as Araucano or Araucanian. Considered a family of 2 languages by
Ethnologue. Variously part of Andean, macro-Panoan, or macro-Waikuruan proposals. |
| Movima | Spoken in Bolivia. |
| Munichi | Spoken in Peru. |
| Nambiquaran | Spoken in Mato Grosso, Brazil. |
| Natú | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Nicaraguan Sign Language | Spoken in Nicaragua. |
| Omurano | Spoken in Peru. A tentative family comprised of Omuranao, Candoshi, Tequiraca, and Taushiro has been
proposed. |
| Otí | Extinct. Spoken in São Paulo, Brazil. Macro-Gêan has been suggested. |
| Pankararú | Extinct. Spoken in Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Pirahã | Spoken in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. Related to other Muran languages that have recently become extinct. |
| Puquina | Extinct. Spoken in Bolivia. Puquina words survive in the Callahuaya jargon of Quechua. |
| Sabela | Spoken in Ecuador and Peru. Also known as Waorani. |
| Taushiro | Spoken in Peru. A tentative family comprised of Omuranao, Candoshi, Tequiraca, and Taushiro has been
proposed. |
| Tequiraca | Spoken in Peru. Also known as Auishiri. A tentative family comprised of Omuranao, Candoshi, Tequiraca, and
Taushiro has been proposed. |
| Ticuna | Spoken in Colombia, Peru, and Brazil. Perhaps related to the extinct Yuri language. |
| Tonkawa | Extinct. Spoken in Texas, United States. |
| Tunica | Extinct. Spoken in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Arkansas, United States. Often linked to Muskogean. |
| Tuxá | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Bahia and Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Warao | Spoken in Guyana, Surinam, and Venezuela. Sometimes linked to Paezan. |
| Xokó | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Alagoas and Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Xukurú | Extinct, poorly known. Spoken in Pernambuco and Paraíba, Brazil. |
| Yámana | Spoken in Chile. |
| Yuracaré | Spoken in Bolivia. Connections to Mosetenan, Pano-Tacanan, Arawakan, Chon and Greenberg's [[Equatorial
languages]] have been proposed. |
| Yuri | Extinct. Spoken in Colombia and Brazil. Perhaps related to Ticuna |
| Yurumanguí | Extinct. Spoken in Colombia. |
*
Orphans with no Families: Languages missing genetic relationships* Campbell, Lyle. (1997).
American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.
* Goddard, Ives (Ed.). (1996).
Languages. Handbook of North American Indians (W. C. Sturtevant, General Ed.) (Vol. 17). Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0-1604-8774-9.
* Goddard, Ives. (1999).
Native languages and language families of North America (rev. and enlarged ed. with additions and corrections). [Map]. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press (Smithsonian Institute). (Updated version of the map in Goddard 1996). ISBN 0-8032-9271-6.
* Grimes, Barbara F. (Ed.). (2000).
Ethnologue: Languages of the world, (14th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. ISBN 1-55671106-9. (Online edition: http://www.ethnologue.com/).
* Mithun, Marianne. (1999).
The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
* Sturtevant, William C. (Ed.). (1978-present).
Handbook of North American Indians (Vol. 1-20). Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. (Vols. 1-3, 16, 18-20 not yet published).