AllExperts > Encyclopedia 
Search      
Find out about volunteering to AllExperts

Legislative veto: Encyclopedia BETA


Free Encyclopedia
 Home · Index · Browse A-Z  · Questions and Answers ·
Encyclopedia

Browse A-Z
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZNum


License
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
Free Online Courses
12 Weeks to Weight Loss
Take Charge of Stress
Learn How to Bake
Budgeting 101
Deeper Faith
DIY Fashion Makeover

       MORE E-COURSES
 
   

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z  Misc

Legislative veto

A legislative veto exists in governments that separate executive and legislative functions if actions by the executive can be rejected by the legislative.

United States

The legislative veto had an interesting, but short-lived function in the United States government.

History

Beginning in the 1930s, the concurrent resolution (as well as the simple resolution) was put to a new useâ€"serving as the instrument to terminate powers delegated tothe Chief Executive or to disapprove particular exercises of power by him or his agents. The legislative veto or congressional veto was first developed in context of the delegation to the Executive of power to reorganize governmental agencies, and was reallyfurthered by the necessities of providing for national security and foreign affairs immediately prior to and during World War II.

The proliferation of congressional veto provisions in legislation over the years raised a series of interrelated constitutional questions. Congress until relatively recently had applied the veto provisions to some action taken by the President or another executive officerâ€"such as a reorganization of an agency, the lowering or raising of tariff rates, the disposal of federal propertyâ€"then began expanding the device to give itself a negative over regulations issued by executive branch agencies, and proposals were made to give Congress a negative over all regulations issued by executive branchindependent agencies.

INS vs. Chadha

In INS v. Chadha, the Supreme Court held a one-House congressional veto to be unconstitutional as violating both the bicameralism principles reflected in Article ISection 1 and Section 7, and the presentment provisions of Section 7, Clauses 2 and 3. The Court's analysis of the presentment issue made clear, however, that two-House veto provisions, despite their compliance with bicameralism, and committee veto provisions sufferthe same constitutional infirmity. In the words of dissenting Justice White, the Court in Chadha "sound[ed] the death knell for nearly 200 other statutory provisions in which Congress has reserveda 'legislative veto.'"

See also

* Veto
* INS v. Chadha
* United States Constitution

External links

* Constitution with Annotations - Article II. Legislative Department



  Rate this Article
   Was this article helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

Email this page
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.
This is the "GNU Free Documentation License" reference article from the English Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. See also our Disclaimer.