Military-industrial complex
The term
military-industrial complex (MIC) usually refers to the combination of the
U.S. armed forces,
arms industry and associated
political and commercial interests, which grew rapidly in scale and influence in the wake of
World War II. The term may also be used for
militarism, in reference to any such business
partnership between industry and military.
As
pejorative terms, the "MIC" or the "
Iron Triangle" refer to an institutionalised
collusion among
defense contractors (industry),
The Pentagon (military), and the
United States government (
Congress,
Executive branch), as being against the
public interest, and driven by
profiteering.
The term was first used publicly by
President of the United States (and former
General of the Army)
Dwight D. Eisenhower in his
Farewell Address to the Nation on
January 17,
1961:
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction...This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.*
Eisenhower warns us of the military industrial complexIn the penultimate draft of the address, Eisenhower initially used the term
military-industrial-congressional complex, indicating the essential role that
U.S. Congress plays in propagating the military industry. But, it is said, that the president chose to strike the word
congressional in order to avoid offending members of the legislative branch of the federal government. The author of the term was Eisenhower's speech-writer
Malcolm Moos.
Vietnam War-era activists referred frequently to the concept. In the late
1990s James Kurth asserted that "[b]y the mid-
1980s . . . the term had largely fallen out of public discussion," and opined that "[w]hatever the power of arguments about the influence of the military-industrial complex on weapons procurement during the
Cold War, they are much less relevant to the current era."
Contemporary students and critics of American
militarism continue to refer to and employ the term, however. For example, historian
Chalmers Johnson uses words from the second, third, and fourth paragraphs quoted above from Eisenhower's address as an
epigraph to Chapter Two ("The Roots of American Militarism") of a recent volume on this subject (
The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic [New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004], p. 39).
The expressions
permanent war economy and
war corporatism are related concepts that have also been used in association with this term.
Although the term was originally coined to describe U.S. circumstances, it has been applied, by extension, to the corresponding situations in other countries. It was not unusual to see it used to describe the arms production industries and political structures of the
Soviet Union, and it has also been used for other countries with an arms-producing economy, such as
Wilhelminian Germany,
Britain,
France and post-Soviet
Russia. The expression is also sometimes applied to the
European Union.
Cult television show
The X-Files displayed a nameless conspiracy of the American government, dominated by the Military-industrial complex's sinister machinations. This conspiracy included everything from tobacco lobbyists to extraterrestrials. Not surprisingly, some conspiracy theorists felt the show was created to disenfranchise their distrust and hide the
real conspiracy. In the third season episode of the series "Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space'" series lead David Duchovny satirizes this by accusing a writer's search for the truth regarding a bizarre alien abuduction as an effort made for "the military-industrial-entertainment complex."
*
Permanent war economy*
Military Keynesianism*
Military funding of scienceWar is a Racket (1935 book by
Smedley Butler)
Why We Fight (2005 documentary film by
Eugene Jarecki)
*
Corporatism*
Militarism*
Prison-industrial complex*
US/Saudi AWACS Sale*
F-35 Lightning II*Eisenhower, Dwight D.
Public Papers of the Presidents, 1035-40. 1960.
*________. "Farewell Address." In
The Annals of America. Vol. 18.
1961-1968: The Burdens of World Power, 1-5. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1968.
*________.
President Eisenhower's Farewell Address, Wikisource.
*Hartung, William D.
"Eisenhower's Warning: The Military-Industrial Complex Forty Years Later." World Policy Journal
18, no. 1 (Spring 2001).
*Johnson, Chalmers The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
, New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004
*Kurth, James. "Military-Industrial Complex." In The Oxford Companion to American Military History
, ed. John Whiteclay Chambers II, 440-42. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
*Nelson, Lars-Erik. "Military-Industrial Man." In New York Review of Books
47, no. 20 (Dec. 21, 2000): 6.
*Nieburg, H. L. In the Name of Science'', Quadrangle Books, 1970
*Andreas, Joel,
Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can't Kick Militarism, ISBN 1-904859-01-1, [
1].
*Cochran, Thomas B., William M. Arkin, Robert S. Norris, Milton M. Hoenig,
U.S. Nuclear Warhead Production Harper and Row, 1987, ISBN 0-88730-125-8
*Friedman, George and Meredith,
The Future of War: Power, Technology and American World Dominance in the 21st Century, Crown, 1996, ISBN 0-517-70403-X
*Keller, William W.,
Arm in Arm: The Political Economy of the Global Arms Trade Basic Books, 1995.
*Kelly, Brain,
Adventures in Porkland: How Washington Wastes Your Money and Why They Won't Stop, Villard, 1992, ISBN 0-679-40656-5
*McDougall, Walter A.,
...The Heavens and the Earth: A Political HIstory of the Space Age, Basic Books, 1985, (
Pulitzer Prize for History) ISBN 0-465-02888-8
*Melman, Seymour,
Pentagon Capitalism: The Political Economy of War, McGraw Hill, 1970
*Melman, Seymour, (ed.)
The War Economy of the United States: Readings in Military Industry and Economy, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1971.
*Mollenhoff, Clark R.,
The Pentagon: Politics, Profits and Plunder, GP Putnam's Sons, 1967
*Patterson, Walter C.,
The Plutonium Business and the Spread of the Bomb, Sierra Club, 1984, ISBN 0-87156-837-3
*Pasztor, Andy,
When the Pentagon Was for Sale: Inside America's Biggest Defense Scandal, Scribner, 1995, ISBN 0-684-19516-X
*Pierre, Andrew J.,
The Global Politics of Arms Sales, Princeton, 1982, ISBN 0-691-02207-0
*Sampson, Anthony,
The Arms Bazaar: From Lebanon to Lockheed, Bantam, 1977, ISBN 0-553-655-X
*St. Clair, Jeffery,
Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror , Common Courage Press (July 1, 2005), ISBN 156751-3360
*Sweetman, Bill, "In search of the Pentagon's billion dollar hidden budgets - how the US keeps its R&D spending under wraps", from
Jane's International Defence Review,
online*Weinberger, Sharon.
Imaginary Weapons. New York: Nation Books, 2006. ISBN 1-56025-849-7.
*
Schema-root.org: military industry 38 military industry topics, each with a current news feed
*
Open Secrets: Top Defense Contributors to Federal Candidates and Parties database
*
War Resisters: Piechart and info on defense spending*
Military-industrial complex on SourceWatch*
National priorities project chart showing how your federal income tax is spent
*
Quotes on Money and Banking and Militarism*
Flows of Money and Patronage from
Washington Truth in Recruiting*
Why We Fight : A Film by Eugene Jarecki exploring the effects of the Military Industrial Complex
