Nur ad-Din
al-Malik al-Adil Nur ad-Din Abu al-Qasim Mahmud Ibn 'Imad ad-Din Zangi (February
1118 –
May 15,
1174), also known as
Nur ed-Din,
Nur al-Din, etc. (in
Arabic: نور الدين
Nūr ad-Dīn) was a member of the
Zengid dynasty who ruled
Syria from
1146 to 1174.
See also: JihadNur ad-Din was the second son of
Imad ad-Din Zengi, the Turkish
atabeg of
Aleppo and
Mosul, who was a devoted enemy of the
crusader presence in Syria. After the assassination of his father, Nur ad-Din and his older brother
Saif ad-Din Ghazi I divided the kingdom amongst themselves, with Nur ad-Din governing
Aleppo and Saif ad-Din establishing himself in
Mosul. The border between the two new kingdoms was formed by the
Nahr al-Khabur river. Almost as soon as he began his rule, Nur ad-Din attacked the
Principality of Antioch, seizing several castles in the north of Syria, while at the same time he defeated an attempt by
Joscelin II to recover the
County of Edessa, which had been conquered by Zengi in
1144. (See
Siege of Edessa.) Nur ad-Din exiled the entire Christian population of the city, in punishment for assisting Joscelin.
Nur ad-Din sought to make alliances with his Muslim neighbours in northern
Iraq and Syria in order to strengthen the Muslim front against their western enemies. In
1147 he signed a bilateral treaty with
Mu'in ad-Din Unur, governor of
Damascus; as part of this agreement, he also married Mu'in ad-Din's daughter. Together Mu'in ad-Din and Nur ad-Din besieged the cities of
Bosra and
Sarkhand, which had been captured by a rebellious vassal of Mu'in ad-Din named Altuntash, but Mu'in ad-Din was always suspicious of Nur ad-Din's intentions and did not want to offend his former crusader allies in
Jerusalem, who had helped defend Damascus against Zengi. To reassure Mu'in ad-Din, Nur ad-Din curtailed his stay in Damascus and turned instead towards the Principality of Antioch, where he was able to seize
Artah, Kafar Latha, Basarfut, and Balat.
In
1148, the
Second Crusade arrived in Syria, led by
Louis VII of France and
Conrad III of Germany. They decided to attack Damascus, despite the former alliance the city had made with the
Kingdom of Jerusalem. Mu'in ad-Din reluctantly called for help from Nur ad-Din; the
crusader siege lasted only four days before Nur ad-Din arrived.
Nur ad-Din took advantage of the failure of the crusade to prepare another attack against Antioch. In
1149, he launched an offensive against the territories dominated by the castle of Harim, situated on the eastern bank of the
Orontes, after which he besieged the castle of
Inab. The Prince of Antioch,
Raymond of Poitiers, quickly came to the aid of the besieged citadel. The Muslim army destroyed the crusader army at the
Battle of Inab, during which Raymond was killed. Raymond's head was sent to Nur ad-Din, who sent it along to the
caliph in
Baghdad. Nur ad-Din marched all the way to the coast and expressed his dominance of Syria by symbolically bathing in the
Mediterranean Sea. He did not, however, attack Antioch itself; he was content with capturing all Antiochene territory east of the Orontes and leaving a rump state around the city, which in any case soon fell under the suzerainty of the
Byzantine Empire. In
1150, he defeated Joscelin II for a final time, after allying with the Seljuk
Sultan of Rüm,
Mas'ud (whose daughter he also married). Joscelin was blinded and died in his prison in Aleppo in
1159. In
1152 Nur ad-Din briefly captured
Tortosa after the assassination of
Raymond II of Tripoli.
It was Nur ad-Din's dream to unite the various Muslim forces between the
Euphrates and the
Nile to make a common front against the crusaders. In 1149 Saif ad-Din Ghazi died, and a younger brother, Qutb ad-Din, succeeded him. Qutb ad-Din recognized Nur ad-Din as overlord of Mosul, so that the major cities of Mosul and Aleppo were united under one man. Damascus was all that remained as an obstacle to the unification of Syria.
After the failure of the Second Crusade, Mu'in ad-Din had renewed his treaty with the crusaders, and after his death in 1149 his successor
Mujir ad-Din followed the same policy. In
1150 and
1151 Nur ad-Din besieged the city, but retreated each time with no success, aside from empty recognition of his suzerainty. When
Ascalon was captured by the crusaders in
1153, Mujir ad-Din forbade Nur ad-Din from travelling across his territory. Mujir ad-Din, however, was a weaker ruler than his predecessor, and he also agreed to pay an annual tribute to the crusaders in exchange for their protection. The growing weakness of Damascus under Mujir ad-Din allowed Nur ad-Din to overthrow him in
1154, with help from the population of the city. Damascus was annexed to Zengid territory, and all Syria was unified under the authority of Nur ad-Din, from
Edessa in the north to the
Hauran in the south. He was cautious not to attack Jerusalem right away, and even continued to send the yearly tribute established by Mujir ad-Din; meanwhile he briefly became involved in affairs to the north of Mosul, where a succession dispute in the Sultanate of Rüm threatened Edessa and other cities.
In
1157 Nur ad-Din besieged the
Knights Hospitaller in the crusader fortress of
Banias and routed a relief army from Jerusalem, but he fell ill that year and the crusaders were given a brief respite from his attacks. In
1159 the
Byzantine emperor Manuel I Comnenus arrived to assert his authority in Antioch, and the crusaders hoped he would send an expedition against Aleppo. However, Nur ad-Din sent ambassadors and negotiated an alliance with the emperor against the Seljuks, much to the crusaders' dismay. Nur ad-Din, along with the
Danishmends of eastern
Anatolia, attacked the Seljuk sultan
Kilij Arslan II from the east the next year, while Manuel attacked from the west. Later in
1160, Nur ad-Din captured the Prince of Antioch,
Raynald of Chatillon after a raid in the Anti-Taurus mountains; Raynald remained in captivity for the next sixteen years. By
1162, with Antioch under nominal Byzantine control and the crusader states further south powerless to make any further attacks on Syria, Nur ad-Din made a pilgrimage to
Mecca. Soon after he returned, he learned of the death of King
Baldwin III of Jerusalem, and out of respect for such a formidable opponent he refrained from attacking the crusader kingdom:
William of Tyre reports that Nur ad-Din said "We should sympathize with their grief and in pity spare them, because they have lost a prince such as the rest of the world does not possess today."
The problem of Egypt
As there was now nothing the crusaders could do in Syria, they were forced to look to the south if they wanted to expand their territory. The capture of Ascalon had already succeeded in cutting off Egypt from Syria, and Egypt had been politically weakened by a series of very young
Fatimid caliphs. By
1163, the caliph was the young al-Adid, but the country was ruled by the vizier Shawar. That year, Shawar was overthrown by Dirgham; soon afterwards, the
King of Jerusalem,
Amalric I, led an offensive against Egypt, on the pretext that the Fatimids were not paying the tribute they had promised to pay during the reign of Baldwin III. This campaign failed and he was forced to return to
Jerusalem, but it provoked Nur ad-Din to lead a campaign of his own against the crusaders in Syria in order to turn their attention away from Egypt. His attack on Tripoli was unsuccessful, but he was soon visited by the exiled Shawar, who begged him to send an army and restore him to the vizierate. Nur ad-Din did not want to spare his own army for a defense of Egypt, but his
Kurdish general
Shirkuh convinced him to invade in
1164. In response, Dirgham allied with Amalric, but the king could not mobilize in time to save him. Dirgham was killed during Shirkuh's invasion and Shawar was restored as vizier.
Shawar immediately expelled Shirkuh and allied with Amalric, who arrived to besiege Shirkuh at
Bilbeis. Shirkuh agreed to abandon Egypt when Amalric was forced to return home, after Nur ad-Din attacked Antioch and
besieged the castle of Harenc. There, Nur ad-Din routed the combined armies of Antioch and Tripoli, but refused to attack Antioch itself, fearing reprisals from the Byzantines. Instead he besieged and captured Banias, and for the next two years continually raided the frontiers of the crusader states. In
1166 Shirkuh was sent again to Egypt. Amalric followed him at the beginning of
1167, and a formal treaty was established between Amalric and Shawar, with the nominal support of the caliph. The crusaders occupied
Alexandria and
Cairo and made Egypt a tributary state, but Amalric could not hold the country while Nur ad-Din still held Syria, and he was forced to return to Jerusalem.
In
1168 Amalric sought an alliance with Emperor Manuel and invaded Egypt once more. Shawar's son Khalil had had enough, and with support from Caliph al-Adil requested help from Nur ad-Din and Shirkuh. At the beginning of
1169 Shirkuh arrived and the crusaders once more were forced to retreat. This time Nur ad-Din gained full control of Egypt. Shawar was executed and Shirkuh's nephew
Saladin was named vizier of the newly conquered territory. One last invasion of Egypt was launched by Amalric and Manuel, but it was disorganized and came to nothing.
During this time Nur ad-Din was busy in the north, fighting the
Ortoqids, and in
1170 he had to settle a dispute between his nephews when his brother Qutb ad-Din died. After conquering Egypt, Nur ad-Din believed that he had accomplished his goal of uniting the Muslim states, but
Saladin did not wish to be subject to his authority. He did not participate in the invasions led by Nur ad-Din against Jerusalem in
1171 and
1173, hoping that the crusader kingdom would act as a buffer state between Egypt and Syria. Nur ad-Din realized that he had created a dangerous opponent in Saladin, and the two rulers assembled their armies for what seemed to be the inevitable war.
However, when Nur ad-Din was on the verge of invading Egypt in
1174, he was seized by a fever due to complications from a
peritonsillar abscess, and died at the age of 59. His young son
As-Salih Ismail al-Malik became his legitimate heir, and Saladin declared himself his vassal, although he really planned to unify Syria and Egypt under his own rule. He married Nur ad-Din's widow, defeated the other claimants to the throne and took power in Syria in
1185, finally realizing Nur ad-Din's dream.
According to
William of Tyre, although Nur ad-Din was "a mighty persecutor of the Christian name and faith," he was also "a just prince, valiant and wise, and according to the traditions of his race, a religious man." Nur ad-Din was especially religious after his illness and his pilgrimage. He considered the crusaders foreigners in Muslim territory, who had come to
Outremer to plunder the land and profane its sacred places. Nevertheless, he was tolerant of the Christians who lived under his authority, aside from the Armenians of Edessa. In contrast to Nur ad-Din's respectful reaction to the death of Baldwin III, Amalric I immediately besieged Banias upon learning of the emir's death, and extorted a vast amount of money from his widow.
Nur ad-Din also constructed universities and mosques in all the cities he controlled. These universities were principally concerned with teaching the
Koran and
Hadith. Nur ad-Din himself enjoyed to have specialists read to him from the Hadith, and his professors even awarded him a diploma in Hadith narration. He had free hospitals constructed in his cities as well, and built
caravanserais on the roads for travellers and pilgrims. He held court several times a week so that people could seek justice from him against his generals, governors, or other employees who had committed some crime. In the Muslim world he remains a legendary figure of military courage, piety, and modesty.
The Damascene chronicler
Ibn al-Qalanisi generally speaks of Nur ad-Din in majestic terms, although he himself died in 1160, and unfortunately did not witness the later events of Nur ad-Din's reign.
*Maalouf, Amin.
The Crusades Through Arab Eyes, 1985
*
Steven Runciman,
A History of the Crusades, vol. II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Cambridge University Press, 1952
The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades, Extracted and Translated from the Chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi. H.A.R. Gibb, 1932 (reprint, Dover Publications, 2002)
*
William of Tyre,
A History of Deeds Done Beyond the Sea, trans. E.A. Babcock and A.C. Krey.
Columbia University Press, 1943
