Particulate
 |
http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/viewrecord?10980 Aerosol pollution over Northern India and Bangladesh - NASA |
Particulates, alternatively referred to as
particulate matter (PM), aerosols or
fine particles, are tiny particles of solid (a smoke) or liquid (an aerosol) suspended in a gas. They range in size from less than 10
nanometres to more than 100
micrometres in diameter. This range of sizes represent scales from a gathering of a few
molecules to the size where the particles no longer can be carried by the gas.
Some aerosols occur naturally, originating from
volcanoes,
dust storms,
forest and
grassland fires, living vegetation, and sea spray. Human activities, such as the burning of
fossil fuels also generate aerosols. Averaged over the globe,
anthropogenic aerosols—those made by human activities—currently account for about 10 percent of the total amount of aerosols in our atmosphere.
Sources
There are both natural and human sources of atmospheric particulates. The biggest natural sources are wind-blown
dust,
volcanoes, and
forest fires. Sea spray is also a large source of particles though most of these fall back to the ocean close to where they were emitted. The biggest human sources of particles are combustion sources, mainly the burning of
fossil fuel in
internal combustion engines in
automobiles and
power plants, and wind blown dust from
construction sites and other land areas where the water or vegetation has been removed. Some of these particles are emitted directly to the atmosphere (
primary emissions) and some are emitted as gases and form particles in the atmosphere (
secondary emissions).
Composition
The composition of fine particles depends on the source. Wind-blown dust tends to be made of mineral
salts and other crystal earth material. Primary emissions from combustion sources are made primarily of unburned fuel (
hydrocarbons), elemental
carbon (
soot), elemental
sulfur, mineral salts, and often contain traces of toxic
metals. Secondary emissions are a combination of
ammonia with either
sulfuric acid or
nitric acid and
water, together with a complex mixture of the organic oxidation products of
VOCs.Several classes of chemical compounds are known or believed to contribute to radiative forcing. These are sulfate, sea-salt, carbonaceous, and mineral dust aerosols. Sulfate aerosols [
1] consists of the sulfate anion existing in various chemical states: sulfuric acid, ammonium bisulfate, ammonium sulfate, or as a dissociated anion in aqueous solution. Sea-salt aerosol [
2], the second largest contributor the global aerosol budget, consists mainly of sodium chloride salt from seawater. Other components of seawater include magnesium chloride and organic compounds, which may influence its chemistry. The range of non-mineral, carbon-containing compounds that constitute the carbonaceous aerosol fraction are usually divided into two subclasses: organic carbon and elemental carbon. Elemental carbon, often referred to as black carbon, is a major constituent of soot. The elemental portion of carbon aerosols are strongly light-absorbing while organic carbon consists of both light-scattering and light-absorbing compounds.[
3] Mineral dust refers to soil, dust and other windblown material from the earth's surface.[
4] This makes up the majority of particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in size across the globe.
Removal Processes
In general, the smaller and lighter a particle is, the longer it will stay in the air. Larger particles (greater than 10 micrometres in diameter) tend to settle to the ground by gravity in a matter of hours whereas the smallest particles (less than 1 micrometre) can stay in the atmosphere for weeks and are mostly removed by
precipitation.
 |
Solar radiation reduction due to volcanic eruptions |
Aerosols, natural and
anthropogenic, can affect the climate by changing the way
radiation is transmitted through the atmosphere. Direct observations of the effects of aerosols are quite limited so any attempt to estimate their global effect necessarily involves the use of computer models. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, says:
While the radiative forcing due to greenhouse gases may be determined to a reasonably high degree of accuracy... the uncertainties relating to aerosol radiative forcings remain large, and rely to a large extent on the estimates from global modelling studies that are difficult to verify at the present time [
5].
A graphic showing the contributions (at 2000, relative to pre-industrial) and uncertainties of various forcings is available
here.
Sulfate aerosol
Sulfate aerosol has two main effects, direct and indirect. The direct effect, via
albedo, is to cool the planet: the
IPCC's best estimate of the
radiative forcing is -0.4
watts per square meter with a range of -0.2 to -0.8 W/m² [
6] but there are substantial uncertainties. The effect varies strongly geographically, with most cooling believed to be at and downwind of major industrial centres. Modern
climate models attempting to deal with the
attribution of recent climate change need to include sulfate forcing, which appears to account (at least partly) for the slight drop in global temperature in the middle of the 20th century. The indirect effect (via the aerosol acting as cloud condensation nuclei,
CCN, and thereby modifying the cloud properties) is more uncertain but is believed to be a cooling.
Black carbon
Black carbon (BC), also called
soot rather loosely is one of the most important absorbing aerosol species in the atmosphere. BC from fossil fuels is estimated by the IPCC in the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, TAR, to contribute a global mean radiative forcing of +0.2 W/m² (was +0.1 W/m² in the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, SAR), with a range +0.1 to +0.4 W/m². All aerosols both absorb and scatter solar (Sun's) and terrestrial (Earth) radiation. When we say, a species is absorbing, it only means that it dominantly absorbs than scatters radiation. A term called Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) is rather used to explain this. SSA is the ratio of scattering to extinction (Extinction includes both scattering and absorption) of radiation by a particle. High SSA implies the aerosol species of interest mainly scatters radiation. Lower SSA implied absorbing aerosols. [Eg: Sea-salt aerosol has an SSA of 1, implying that a sea-salt particle only scatters, whereas Soot has an SSA of 0.23, which is one of the most important and dominant aerosol absorber in the Atmosphere.]
The effects of inhaling particulate matter has been widely studied in humans and animals and include
asthma,
lung cancer, cardiovascular issues, and premature
death. The size of the particle determines where in the body the particle will come to rest if inhaled. Larger particles are generally filtered by small hairs in the nose and throat and do not cause problems, but particulate matter smaller than about 10 micrometres, referred to as
PM10, can settle in the bronchi and
lungs and cause health problems. Particles smaller than 2.5 micrometres,
PM2.5, can penetrate directly into the lung, whereas particles smaller than 1 micrometer
PM1 can penetrate into the
alveolar region of the lung and tend to be the most hazardous when inhaled. In particular, a study published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association (Pope et. al, 2002), indicates that PM
2.5 leads to high plaque deposits in arteries, causing vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis — a hardening of the arteries that reduces elasticity, which can lead to heart attacks and other cardiovascular problems. Researchers suggest that even short-term exposure at elevated concentrations could significantly contribute to heart disease.
There is evidence that particles smaller than 100 nanometres can pass through cell membranes. For example, particles can migrate into the brain. It has been suggested that particulate matter can cause similar brain damage as that found in
Alzheimer patients. Particles emitted from modern
diesel engines (commonly referred to as
Diesel Particulate Matter, or DPM) are typically in the size range of 100 nanometres (0.1 micrometres). In addition, these
soot particles also carry
carcinogenic components like
benzopyrenes adsorbed on their surface. In view of these deposition mechanisms, it is becoming increasingly clear that the legislative limits for engines, which are in terms of emitted mass, are not a proper measure of the health hazard. One particle of 10 µm diameter has approximately the same mass as 1 million particles of 100 nm diameter, but it is clearly much less hazardous, as it probably never enters the human body - and if it does, it is quickly removed. Proposals for new regulations exist in some countries, with suggestions to limit the particle surface area or the particle number.
The large number of deaths and other health problems associated with particulate pollution was first demonstrated in the early 1970s (Lave et. al, 1973) and has been reproduced many times since. PM pollution is estimated to cause 20,000-50,000 deaths per year in the United States (Mokdad et. al, 2004) and 200,000 deaths per year in
Europe). For this reason, the US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets standards for PM
10 and PM
2.5 concentrations in urban air. EPA regulates primary particulate emissions and precursors to secondary emissions (
NOx,
sulfur, and
ammonia). Many
urban areas in the US and Europe still frequently violate the particulate standards, though urban air has gotten cleaner, on average, with respect to particulates over the last quarter of the 20th century.
In
directives 1999/30/EC and 96/62/EC, the
European Commission has set limits for PM
10 in the air:
| Phase 1 from 1 January 2005 | Phase 2¹ from 1 January 2010 |
|---|
|Yearly average|40 µg/m³|20 µg/m³
|Daily average (24-hour)
allowed number of exceedences per year.|50 µg/m³
35|50 µg/m³
7
¹ indicative value.
'Aerosol Science and Technology' [
7]
*
Article at earthobservatory.nasa.gov describing the possible influence of aerosols on the climate*
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the principal international scientific body on climate change) chapter on atmospheric aerosols and their radiative effects* Lave, Lester B. & Eugene P. Seskin (1973). "An Analysis of the Association Between U.S. Mortality and Air Pollution," Journal of the American Statistical Association
68, 342.
* [
8] InsideEPA.com, Study Links Air Toxics To Heart Disease In Mice Amid EPA Controversy
* Mokdad, Ali H., et. al (2004). "Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000". Journal of the American Medical Association.
291 (10), 1238-1235.
* Pope, C Arden, et. al (2002). "Cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution." Journal of the American Medical Association.
287, 1132-1141.
* G Invernizzi et al.,
Particulate matter from tobacco versus diesel car exhaust: an educational perspective.
Tobacco Control 13, S.219-221 (2004)
*
Air pollution*
Biological warfare* Canada-Wide Standards for particulate matter (2.5) & ozone [
9]
*
Diesel particulate matter*
Dust*
Global warming*
Global Atmosphere Watch*
Haze*
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (USA)
*
Radiological weapon*
Clouds*
Fog*
National Pollutant Inventory - Particulate matter fact sheet*WHO-Europe reports:
Health Aspects of Air Pollution (2003) (PDF) and "
Answer to follow-up questions from CAFE (2004) (PDF)
*
American Association for Aerosol Research*
Particulate Air Pollution — A summary for non specialists by
GreenFacts of the above WHO reports. (NPOV)
*
Aerosol Society - The Development of Aerosol Science in the United Kingdom
*
Watch and read 'Dirty Little Secrets', 2006 Australian science documentary on health effects of fine particle pollution from vehicle exhausts