Suicide attack
A
suicide attack is an attack in which the attacker or attackers intend and expect to die (see
suicide). In a suicide attack in the strict sense the attacker dies by the attack itself, for example in an explosion or crash caused by the attacker. In a suicide attack in a wider sense, the attacker is sure or almost sure to die by the defense or retaliation of the attacked party.
In ancient times, an example of suicide attack is a killing by a dagger-wielding assassin, who is then killed by the victim's bodyguards, family (etc.) or tried and executed.
In modern times, such attacks are often carried out with the help of vehicles or
explosive materials such as a
bomb (a
suicide bombing), or both (i.e. a vehicle loaded with explosives). If everything goes to plan, the attacker is killed upon impact or
detonation.
Suicide attacks are a kind of
tactic, planned and organized by extremely
committed military or
paramilitary groups. This tactic became widely known during the
Second World War in the Pacific as
Allied ships were attacked by
Japanese kamikaze pilots who caused maximum damage by flying their explosive-laden
aircraft into military targets. Since the
1980s, the low cost and high lethality of the tactic have made it a favorite with
guerrilla,
insurgent, and especially
terrorist groups, notably in the
Middle East and
Sri Lanka. The
Tamil Tigers were, as of
2000, "unequivocally the most effective and brutal terrorist organization ever to utilize suicide terrorism";
[according to Yoram Schweitzer of the Institute for Counter-Terrorism in Israel: [1]] since the Tigers signed a
cease-fire in
2001, suicide bombings by
Islamist militants, mostly in the
Al-Aqsa Intifada and the
Iraqi insurgency, have been the most frequent and cumulatively destructive. The
September 11, 2001 attacks used
hijacked airplanes to become the largest and most destructive individual suicide attacks on one day.
Military historians classify suicide bombing as a form of armed
violence, belonging to the tactics of
asymmetric warfare"suicide bombings are only common when one side in a violent
conflict lacks the means for effective, conventional attacks. The
cost-benefit analysis, expressed here by
Al Qaeda leader
Ayman al-Zawahiri, is simple: "The method of
martyrdom operation [is] the most successful way of inflicting damage against the opponent and the least costly to the
mujahidin in terms of casualties".
[http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ayman_bk.html] The strategic rationale may be military, political, or both; the target may be military, in which case the bombing is usually classified as an act of war, or
civilian, in which case it is usually considered terrorism. Civilians are the favored targets, being easier to attack than
fortified installations,
armored vehicles, or armed and wary
soldiers. The political message of the suicide bomber's ruthlessness and glorification of death is potent, and the difficulty of deterring an attacker who is willing to die sparks greater fear than other forms of terrorism. The fact that the attacker dies in the attack eliminates the need for the attacker to have a plan to escape and avoid capture after he has completed the attack. The regular targeting of civilians, however, often calls into question the
moral legitimacy, and often erodes the broader credibility, of the bomber's cause (although in some of the perpetrating group's base population, it may be thought to enhance those qualities).
The bombers themselves may be male or female, with males more common in some venues (
female suicide bombers are common among the Tamil Tigers, Chechen rebels, Palestinian militants and the
Kurdistan Workers Party) and are often from
middle-class backgrounds in countries with little
political freedom. They are usually well-educated and hold strong political or
religious beliefs; they are generally not
poverty-stricken or
mentally ill, though some may have had difficult
childhoods. The ritualistic communion of the
extremist groups to which they belong ("lone wolf" suicide bombers are rare), in addition to their strongly-held beliefs, helps motivate their decision to commit suicide; for the religious, e.g.
Hamas, the rewards of an afterlife may provide additional impetus. Coercion and deception are occasionally factors.
Suicide attacks throughout history have taken various forms and have been encouraged by the lionization of those who laid down their lives for causes they deemed righteous. There are numerous examples, from
Samson's suicidal destruction of a
Philistine temple (as recounted in the
Book of Judges) to the legendary
Swiss hero
Arnold von Winkelried to the Japanese
kamikaze pilots of
World War II. The first modern suicide bombing—involving explosives deliberately carried to the target either on the person or in a civilian vehicle and delivered by surprise—was in
1981; perfected by the factions of the
Lebanese Civil War and especially by the
Tamil Tigers of
Sri Lanka, the tactic had spread to dozens of countries by
2005. Those hardest-hit were
Lebanon during its
civil war, Sri Lanka during
its prolonged ethnic conflict,
Israel and the
Palestinian Territories since
1994, and
Iraq since the
invasion in 2003.
Responses and reactions to suicide bombings are mixed, so that a full assessment of the action's impact—especially whether it helped or hindered the cause in whose name it was carried out—is difficult. The public response of politicians is usually one of determination and condemnation. Military and
law enforcement are
mobilized to disrupt or destroy the organization which planned the attack or, in Israel, to
punish the families of bombers. Those who support the bomber's cause will often hold him up as a hero;
militant Islamist groups like Al Qaeda, for example, lionize suicide bombers as
Shahid, or 'martyr'.
The term dates back to the
1940s, when it was used in reference to certain
German and Japanese battle tactics, but did not gain its present meaning until
1981. Various alternate terms have been used to
frame the act differently: the Islamist use of
shahid for the bomber or
martyrdom operation for the bombing emphasize the self-sacrificial aspects, while the term "homicide bombing" (preferred phraseology of the
George W. Bush Administration and right-leaning
media outlets such as
Fox News) emphasizes the fact that the bomber kills others.
In the case of using explosives, a suicide attack does not require remote or delayed detonation. In the case of causing a crash, it allows human guidance of the weapon (carrying it, driving a car or boat, flying a plane, etc.) without the need for remote or automatic control as in a
guided missile. Also, obviously, the attack plan does not require a plan on escaping to safety from the enemy after the attack.
Examples:
*Suicide attack on foot:
explosive belt*attempted suicide attack with a plane as target:
Richard Reid (shoe bomber) on
American Airlines Flight 63*Suicide
car bomb:
1983 Beirut barracks bombing*Suicide attack by a boat with explosives:
USS Cole bombing*Suicide attack by a submarine with explosives (human-steered
torpedo):
Kaiten, used by Japan in
World War II*Suicide attack by a plane with explosives:
kamikaze*Suicide attack by a plane with fuel:
September 11, 2001 attacksIn some cases a nuclear attack on a nuclear power may be considered a suicide attack in the wider sense, with the attacking country being sure or almost sure of going to suffer many fatalities in a retaliation. See also
mutually assured destruction.
See also
suicide weapon.
Suicide attacks usually (but not always) target poorly-guarded, non-military facilities and
personnel. It can be either a military tactic, a political one, or a mixture of the two. It may qualify as
terrorism when the intention is to kill, maim or terrorise a predominantly civilian target population, or fall within the definition of an act of war when it is committed against a military target under war conditions.
As a political tactic, suicide attacks send a message of impassioned opposition to enemy forces (that the attacker is willing to die for his or her cause) and a message of desperate recklessness to third parties (that the attacker feels the justice of the cause so strongly that he would rather die than submit and that he is giving little thought to the danger). However, it may backfire, as suicide attacks ignite rage and hatred and undermine the belief in the humanity of those who perpetrate them.
When used against civilian targets, suicide attacks usually cause fear in the target population greater than that caused by other forms of terrorism, as the fact that the attacker intends to die makes deterrents ineffective. However, use against civilian targets has differing effects on their goals (see reaction below). Some
economists suggest that this tactic goes beyond symbolism and is actually a response to commodified, controlled, or
devalued lives, as the suicide attackers apparently consider family prestige and financial compensation from the community as compensation for their own lives. Further supporting the idea that suicide attacks are a product of
evolutionary psychology, equatable "sacrifice for the group" tactics are used successfully by other societal animals in nature, most obviously by
bees.
The
doctrine of asymmetric warfare views suicide attacks as a result of an imbalance of power, in which groups with little significant power resort to suicide bombing as a response to actions or policies of a group with greater power. Groups which have significant power have no need to resort to suicide bombing to achieve their aims; consequently, suicide bombing is overwhelmingly used by guerrilla, and other
irregular fighting forces. Among many such groups, there are religious overtones to martyrdom: attackers and their supporters may believe that their sacrifice will be rewarded in an
afterlife. Suicide attackers often believe that their actions are in accordance with moral or social standards because they are aimed at fighting forces and conditions that they perceive as unjust.
Profile of a bomber
A common reaction to a suicide bomber is to assume that he or she was motivated by despair, and probably came from a
poor, neglected segment of
society. Both President
George W. Bush and the
Dalai Lama have made this claim. However,
anthropologist Scott Atran found in a
2003 study that this is not a justifiable conclusion. A recently published paper by
Harvard University Professor of Public Policy
Alberto Abadie "cast[s] doubt on the widely held belief that terrorism stems from poverty, finding instead that terrorist violence is related to a nation's level of political freedom."
[http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.aabadie.academic.ksg/povterr.pdf] More specifically this is due to the transition of countries towards democratic freedoms. "Intermediate levels of political freedom are often experienced during times of political transitions, when governments are weak, political instability is elevated, so conditions are favorable for the appearance of terrorism".
[http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2004/11.04/05-terror.html Quote][http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.aabadie.academic.ksg/povterr.pdf Original Paper] From 2003 to 2004, women were more frequently involved in suicide attacks in the Middle East and elsewhere. In
Messengers of Death: Female Suicide Bombers, Clara Beyler writes that women have channeled the frustration stemming from their role in society into ruthless behavior.
[http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=508] This can demonstrate strength and power in societies where women have a submissive role. That women have become more involved in suicide bombings makes it more difficult to profile a suicide bomber.
Some suicide bombers are educated, with
college or
university experience, and come from
middle class homes. Most suicide bombers do not show signs of
psychopathology. Indeed, leaders of the groups who perpetrate these attacks search for individuals who can be trusted to carry out the mission; those with mental illnesses are not ideal candidates. They often find solace in the ritualistic communion found in extremist circles, which are often headed by
charismatic individuals looking for new
recruits.
Background
Often acts of terrorism, such as the suicide bombing of civilians, are compared to the self-sacrifice of soldiers in wartime. The principle difference is that the soldier is implementing the policy of a nation and is thus held responsible, whereas a civilian may or may not support their nation's policies and may or may not consider the terrorist's nation (or peoples) an enemy.
The concept of self-sacrifice has long been a part of war. From the earliest days of honoring fallen soldiers as
heroes, those who sacrifice themselves to further a political, moral, or cultural
ideology have been and are still highly regarded figures in their respective societies. Soldiers who lay down their lives to protect their comrades are commonly awarded the highest recognition for
courage in battle, while those who survive combat are honored for their physical and psychological sacrifice. An example for such self-sacrifice in warfare in medieval legend is
Arnold von Winkelried. The earliest reference of a suicide attack outside a context of warfare is the Biblical story of the
Amorites attacking the
Jews:
The Amorite who dwell on that mountain went out against you and pursued you as the bees would do; they struck you in Seir until Hormah. (Deuteronomy 1:44)
Rashi says "as the bees would do" means they attacked like how bees do (i.e. when they attacked and they would die) and not that they attack in swarms like bees.
During the
Crusades, the
Knights Templar destroyed one of their own ships, killing 140
Christians in order to kill ten times as many
Muslims. Another early example of suicide bombing occurred during the
Belgian Revolution, when the
Dutch Lieutenant Jan van Speijk detonated his own ship in the
harbour of
Antwerp to prevent being captured by the Belgians.
The act of deliberately destroying oneself to inflict harm on an enemy is more restricted to modern times and the era of explosives. The line between the two is considered by some a matter of subjectivity, as in the argument that many WWII soldiers killed were "
martyrs" (in the sense that they were to suffer for the sake of a principle, rather than dying as the penalty for refusing to renounce a belief) because their life expectancy in combat was very low—often averaging only two or three months.
Modern suicide bombing as a political tool can be traced back to the assisination of Czar Alexander II of Russia in 1881. Alexander fell victim to a Nihilist plot. While driving on one of the central streets of St. Petersburg, near the Winter Palace, he was mortally wounded by the explosion of hand-made grenades and died a few hours afterwards. The Czar was killed by the Pole Ignacy Hryniewiecki (1856-1881), who died while intentionally exploding the bomb during the attack.
The ritual act of self-sacrifice during combat appeared in a large scale at the end of
World War II with the
Japanese
kamikaze bombers. In these attacks, airplanes were used as flying bombs. Later in the war, as Japan became more desperate, this act became formalized and ritualized, as planes were outfitted with explosives specific to the task of a suicide mission. Kamikaze strikes were a weapon of symmetric war used by the
Empire of Japan chiefly against
United States Navy aircraft carriers.
The Japanese Navy also used both one and two man piloted
torpedoes called
kaiten on suicide missions. Although sometimes called
midget submarines, these were modified versions of the unmanned torpedoes of the time and are distinct from the torpedo-firing midget submarines used earlier in the war, which were designed to
infiltrate shore defences and return to a
mother ship after firing their torpedoes. Though extremely hazardous, these midget submarine attacks were not technically suicide missions; while the early
kaiten were equipped with escape hatches, there is no evidence that they were ever used or that the pilots had any intention of using them. Later kaitens, by contrast, provided no means of escape.
After aiming a two-person kaiten at their target, the two crew members traditionally embraced and shot each other in the head. Social support for such choices was strong, due in part to Japanese cultural history, in which
seppuku, honorable suicide, was part of
samurai duty. It was also fostered and indoctrinated by the Imperial program to
persuade, often through
coercion (such as through doping), the Japanese soldiers to commit these acts.
Following World War II,
Viet Minh "death volunteers" fought against the
French colonial army by using a long stick-like explosive to detonate French tanks, as part of their urban warfare tactics.
In
1972 in the hall of the
Lod airport in
Tel-Aviv,
Israel, three Japanese used
grenades and
automatic rifles to kill 26 people and wound more than a hundred. The group belonged to the
Japanese Red Army (JRA) a terrorist organization created in
1969 and
allied to the
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Until then, no group involved in terrorism had conducted such a suicide operation in Israel. Members of the JRA became instructors in
martial art and
Kamikaze operations at several
Hezbollah training camps bringing the suicide techniques to the
Middle East.
1980s to present
The first modern suicide bombing occurred in Iran in 1980 when 13-year old Hossein Fahmideh detonated himself as he ran up to an Iraqi tank at a key point in a battle of the Iran-Iraq War. Lebanon, during
its civil war, saw a modern suicide bombing: the
Islamic Dawa Party's
car bombing of the Iraqi
embassy in
Beirut, in December
1981.
Hezbollah's
bombing of the U.S. embassy in April 1983 and
attack on United States Marine and French barracks in October 1983 brought suicide bombings international attention. Other parties to the civil war were quick to adopt the tactic, and by
1999 factions such as Hezbollah, the
Amal Movement, the
Ba'ath Party, and the
Syrian Social Nationalist Party had carried out around 50 suicide bombings between them. (The latter of these groups sent the first
female suicide bomber in
1986. Female combatants have existed throughout human history and in many different societies, so it is possible that females who engage in suicidal attacks are not new.) Hezbollah was the only one to attack overseas,
bombing the Israeli embassy (and possibly the
Argentine-Israeli Mutual Association building) in
Buenos Aires; as its military and political power have grown, it has since abandoned the tactic.
Lebanon saw the first bombing, but it was the
Tamil Tigers who perfected the tactic and inspired its use elsewhere. Their
Black Tiger unit have committed between 76 and 168 (estimates vary) suicide bombings since
1987, using more than 240 attackers. Their victims included former
Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi (assassinated by
Thenmuli Rajaratnam), many prominent Lankan leaders (among them the late PM
Ranasinghe Premadasa),
Colombo's
Central Bank, and even
warships.
In
Northern Ireland, in the early
1990s, as part of the
Provisional IRA campaign 1969-1997, the
IRA used the tactic it called the the "
proxy bomb" -a sort of involuntary suicide bomb, where a victim was kidnapped and forced to drive a car bomb into its target. In one infamous operation in Derry in 1990, the PIRA chained a Catholic civilian to a car laden with explosives, held his family hostage and forced him to drive to a British Army checkpoint as a "human bomb" where the bomb exploded, killing himself and five soldiers. This practice was stopped due to the revulsion its caused among the
Irish nationalist community.
Suicide bombing has, since
1993, been a particularly popular tactic amongst some
Palestinian groups, including
Hamas,
Islamic Jihad, and the
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. Bombers affiliated with these groups often use so-called "
suicide belts",
explosive devices (often including
shrapnel) designed to be strapped to the body under clothing. In order to maximize the loss of life, the bombers may seek out cafés or city crowded with people at
rush hour, or less commonly a military target (for example, soldiers waiting for transport at roadside). By seeking enclosed locations, a successful bomber usually kills a number of people.
Palestinian
television has aired a number of
music videos and announcements that
promote eternal reward for children who seek
"shahada",
[http://www.pmw.org.il/tv%20part1.html] which
Palestinian Media Watch has claimed is "Islamic motivation of suicide terrorists".
[http://www.pmw.org.il/index.html] The Chicago Tribune has documented the concern of Palestinian parents that their children are encouraged to take part in suicide operations.
[http://www.eufunding.org/Textbooks/EuropesPalestinianChildren.html] Israeli sources have also alleged that Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah operate "Paradise Camps," training children as young as 11 to become suicide bombers.
[http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4153_62.asp][http://www.cnsnews.com/ForeignBureaus/archive/200107/For20010723d.html] |
The explosion resulting from the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center towers. |
The
September 11, 2001 attacks involved the
hijacking of large passenger
jets which were deliberately flown into the towers of the
World Trade Center in
New York City and
the Pentagon, killing everyone aboard the planes and thousands more in and around the targeted buildings, thus making it one of the most destructive suicide attacks in history. The passenger jets selected were required to be fully fueled to fly cross-country, turning the planes themselves into the largest suicide bombs in history. The 'September 11' attacks also had a vast economic and political impact: for the cost of the lives of the 19 hijackers and financial expenditure of around US$100,000,
al-Qaeda, the
militant Islamist group responsible for the attacks, effected a trillion-dollar drop in global markets within one week, and triggered massive increases in military and security expenditure in response.
In
December 22 2001,
Richard Reid attempted to destroy the
American Airlines Flight 63 by the means of a bomb hidden in a shoe. He was arrested after his attempt was foiled when he was unable to light the bomb's
fuse.
After the
U.S.-led
invasion of Iraq in 2003,
Iraqi and foreign insurgents carried out waves of suicide bombings. They attacked
United States military targets, although many civilian targets (eg.
Shiite mosques, international offices of the
UN and the
Red Cross, Iraqi men waiting to apply for jobs with the new army and
police force) were also attacked. In the lead up to the
Iraqi parliamentary election, on
January 30,
2005, suicide attacks upon civilian and security personnel involved with the
elections increased, and there were reports of the insurgents co-opting disabled people as involuntary suicide bombers.
[http://www.smh.com.au/news/After-Saddam/Handicapped-boy-made-into-bomb/2005/02/01/1107228705132.html]Suicide bombings have occurred in more than 30 countries:
Afghanistan,
Algeria,
Argentina,
Bangladesh,
China,
Colombia,
Croatia,
Egypt,
India,
Indonesia,
Iraq,
Israel,
Jordan,
Kenya,
Kuwait,
Lebanon,
Morocco,
Pakistan, the
Palestinian territories,
Panama, the
Philippines,
Qatar,
Russia,
Saudi Arabia,
Sri Lanka,
Tanzania,
Tunisia,
Turkey,
United Kingdom,
Uzbekistan, and
Yemen. (Suicide planes were also used in the
United States).
 |
The wreckage of a bus in Jerusalem after a suicide bombing by Hamas on 18 June, in which 19 people were killed. |
World leaders, especially those of countries that experience suicide bombings, usually express resolve to continue on their previous course of affairs after such attacks. They denounce suicide bombings and sometimes vow not to let such bombings deter ordinary people from going about their everyday business.
Suicide bombings in
Israel are sometimes followed by
reprisals. As a successful suicide bomber cannot be targeted, the response is often a targeting of those believed to have sent the bomber. In targeting such
organizations, Israel often uses military strikes against organizations, individuals, and possibly
infrastructure. In the
West Bank the
IDF used to
demolish homes that belong to families whose children have volunteered for such missions, however this practice has stopped. There are reports in the Israeli press about families who turned in their children after learning about a possible suicide bombing attack, fearful their house would be demolished.
The effectiveness of suicide bombings—notably those of the Japanese
kamikazes, the Palestinian bombers, and even the September 11, 2001 attacks—is debatable.Although kamikaze attacks could not stop the
Allied advance the
Pacific, they inflicted more casualties and delayed the fall of
Japan for longer than might have been the case using only the conventional methods available to the
Japanese Empire. Subsequently, Japanese leaders acknowledged the great cost in losing many of their best young men in these actions. The attacks reinforced the resolution of the
World War II Allies to destroy the Imperial force, and may have had a significant effect in the decision to use
atomic bombs against
Japan.
In the case of the September 11th attacks, the long-term effects remain to be seen, but in the short-to-medium term, the results were profoundly negative for Al-Qaeda as well as for the
Taliban Movement. Furthermore, since the September 11 attacks, Western nations have diverted massive resources towards stopping similar actions, as well as tightening up
borders, and military actions against various countries that the
U.S. and its allies believe to have been involved with terrorism. However critics of the
War on Terrorism suggest that in fact the results were profoundly positive, as the proceeding actions of the
United States and other countries has increased the number of recruits, and their willingness to carry out suicide bombings.
It is more difficult to determine whether Palestinian suicide bombings have proved to be a successful tactic. In the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the suicide bombers were repeatedly deployed since the
Oslo Accords.
[http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+before+2000/Fatal+Terrorist+Attacks+in+Israel+Since+the+DOP+-S.htm] In
1996, the Israelis elected the conservative candidate
Benjamin Netanyahu who promised to restore safety by conditioning every step in the
peace process on Israel's assessment of the
Palestinian Authority's fulfillment of its obligations in curbing violence as outlined in the Oslo agreements.
In the course of
al-Aqsa Intifada which followed the collapse of the
Camp David II summit between the
PLO and Israel, the number of suicide attacks drastically increased. In response,
Israel mobilized its army in order to seal off the
Gaza Strip and reinstate military control of the
West Bank, patrolling the area with
tanks. The Israelis also began a campaign of targeted
assassinations to kill
militant Palestinian leaders, using jets and
helicopters to deploy
high-precision bombs and missiles.
The suicide missions, having killed hundreds and maimed thousands of Israelis, are believed by some to have brought on a move to the political right, increasing public support for hard-line policies towards the Palestinians, and a government headed by the former
general,
prime minister Ariel Sharon. In response to the suicide bombings, Sharon's government has imposed restrictions on the Palestinian community, making commerce, travel, school, and other aspects of life difficult for the Palestinians, with the average Palestinian suffering due to the choices of the suicide bombers. The
Separation barrier under construction seem to be part of the Israeli government's efforts to stop suicide bombers from entering Israel proper.
Social support by some for this activity remained, however, as of the calling of a truce at the end of June
2003. This may be due to the economic or social purpose of the suicide bombing and the bombers' refusal to accept external judgements on those who sanction them.
If the objective is to kill as many people as possible, suicide bombing by terrorists may thus "work" as a tactic in that it costs fewer lives than any conventional military tactic and targeting unarmed civilians is much easier than targeting soldiers. As an objective designed to achieve some form of favorable outcome, especially a political outcome, most believe it to be a failure. Terrorist campaigns involving the targeting of civilians have never won a war. Analysts believe that in order to win or succeed, any guerrilla or terrorist campaign must first transform into something more than a guerrilla or terrorist movement.
[http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20050723-092116-9131r.htm] Such analysts believe that a terrorist cause has little political attraction and success may be achieved only by renouncing terrorism and transforming the passions into politics.
Often extremists assert that, because they are outclassed militarily, suicide bombings are necessary. For example, the former leader of
Hamas Sheikh Ahmad Yassin stated: "Once we have warplanes and missiles, then we can think of changing our means of legitimate self-defense. But right now, we can only tackle the fire with our bare hands and sacrifice ourselves."
[Quoted in Mia Bloom, Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005) p. 3-4.]Such views are challenged both from the outside and from within Islam. According to Islamic jurist and scholar
Khaled Abou Al-Fadl,
The classical jurists, nearly without exception, argued that those who attack by stealth, while targeting noncombatants in order to terrorize the resident and wayfarer, are corrupters of the earth. "Resident and wayfarer" was a legal expression that meant that whether the attackers terrorize people in their urban centers or terrorize travelers, the result was the same: all such attacks constitute a corruption of the earth. The legal term given to people who act this way was muharibun (those who wage war against society), and the crime is called the crime of hiraba (waging war against society). The crime of hiraba was so serious and repugnant that, according to Islamic law, those guilty of this crime were considered enemies of humankind and were not to be given quarter or sanctuary anywhere. ...Those who are familiar with the classical tradition will find the parallels between what were described as crimes of hiraba and what is often called terrorism today nothing short of remarkable. The classical jurists considered crimes such as assassinations, setting fires, or poisoning water wells - that could indiscriminately kill the innocent - as offenses of hiraba. Furthermore, hijacking methods of transportation or crucifying people in order to spread fear and terror are also crimes of hiraba. Importantly, Islamic law strictly prohibited the taking of hostages, the mutilation of corpses, and torture.[Khaled Abou Al-Fadl: The Great Theft. Wrestling Islam from the Extremists (HarperCollins 2005. ISBN 0060563397) p.243]
The Islamic View
The vast majority of mainstream Islamic judicial opinion rejects suicide for any reason.
[http://islam.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=islam&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fatwa-online.com%2Fworship%2Fjihaad%2Fjih004%2Findex.htm] [http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/Fatwa/ShowFatwa.php?Option=FatwaId&lang=E&Id=699]According to Professor Charles A. Kimball, chair of the Department of Religion at
Wake Forest University in
Winston-Salem, "There is only one verse in the Qur'an that contains a phrase related to suicide", Verse 4:29 of the
Qur'an.
[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html] It reads "O you who believe! Do not consume your wealth in the wrong way-rather through trade mutually agreed to, and do not kill yourselves. Surely God is Merciful toward you." Some commentators believe that the phrase "do not kill yourselves" is better translated "do not kill each other", and some translations (e.g.
Shakir) reflect that view. (A note on the Qur'an's unique textual density is perhaps in order here: It is not uncommon for a single Qur'anic Arabic phrase to embrace two or more complimentary meanings at the same time, and this may be the case with 4:29.)
Mainstream Islamic groups such as the European Council for Fatwa and Research use the Quran'ic verse Al-Anam 6:151 ("And take not life, which Allah has made sacred, except by way of justice and law") as further reason to prohibit suicide.
[http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503549272&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholar] In addition, the
hadith unambiguously forbid suicide.
[http://www.aljazeerah.info/Islam/Islamic%20subjects/2004%20subjects/June/Committing%20Suicide%20Is%20Strictly%20Forbidden%20in%20Islam,%20Adil%20Salahi.htm]A contrary view is presented by Faisal Bodi writing in
The Guardian, who said many Muslims celebrate martyr-bombers as heroes defending things they hold sacred.
. The intention was to focus attention on the alleged intention of
genocide by militant
Palestinians in their calls to "Wipe Israel off the map."
This term is not common, and often self-contradictory. Whatever their theoretical intentions, parties which employ suicide bombing generally do so because they have no means whatsoever to conduct genocide or even warfare.
*
Assassination*
Child suicide bombers in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict*
Al Fateh*
The Tailor of Death*
The psychology of Palestinian suicide bombing and Israeli paranoia*
The Economic Logic of Suicide Terrorism by Mark Harrison *
The Logic of Suicide Terrorism by
Bruce Hoffman published in
The Atlantic Magazine June 2003
*
Suicide Bombers Why do they do it, and what does Islam say about their actions?
*
The Hijacked Caravan Study refuting suicide bombing in Islam by Ihsanic Intelligence
*
Defending the Transgressed Fatwa against suicide bombing by Shaykh Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti
*
What makes suicide bombers tick? - Suicide bomber profile and info
*
The Culture of Martyrdom How suicide bombing became not just a means but an end by
David Brooks in
The Atlantic Magazine June 2002
*
Erased In A Moment Suicide Bombing Attacks Against Israeli Civilians [Human Rights Watch]
*
History of use of the phrase "suicide bomber"*
USAF Suicide Bombers Intelligence Brief*
Has Israel beaten the suicide bombers? The Telegraph.
*
Women Armed for Terror - list of women terrorist-bombers.
*
An Islamist view of Martyrdom Operations*
The mechanics of a living bomb*
Chronology of suicide bomb attacks by Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka*
How a laser device can detect a suicide bomber's explosives belt or chemical weapons from dozens of meters away - A web article
*
short clip showing the victims of Palestinian suicide bombing Warning: Graphic Images*
An examination of the most thoroughly stated 'fatwa' approving of suicide bombing. By Abdassamad Clarke
*
Suicide Killers - 2006 Documentary by Pierre Rehov
*
Cult of the Suicide Bomber- a television history by ex-CIA agent Robert Baer
* Rex Hudson (2002),
Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why: The 1999 Government Report on Profiling Terrorists, Lyons Press, ISBN 1585747548
* Mia Bloom (2005),
Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0231133200
*
Robert Pape (2005),
Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism, Random House, ISBN 1400063175
* Diego Gambetta, Editor (2005),
Making Sense of Suicide Missions, OUP, ISBN 0199276994
* Farhad Khosrokhavar, translated by David Macey (2005),
Suicide Bombers: Allah's New Martyrs, Pluto Press, ISBN 0745322832
*
Martin Kramer. 1996.
Sacrifice and "Self-Martyrdom" in Shi'ite Lebanon.
*
Bernard B. Fall. 1966.
Hell in a Very Small Place: The Siege of Dien Bien Phu. Da Capo Press. (References to suicide bombers on pages 352 and 368).
*M.R. Narayan Swamy. 1996.
Tigers of Lanka: From Boys to Guerrillas, 2nd Ed. Vijitha Yapa Bookshop (Colombo).
* Dr. Eyad Sarraj. "Why we have become Suicide Bombers".
"תאב"ות* Gerhart Scheit. 2005.
Suicide Attack ISBN 3-924627-87-8 (German)
* Reuter, Christoph trans. Ragg-Kirby, Helena.
My Life is a Weapon: A Modern History of Suicide Bombing. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2004.
*{{cite book
last = Davis | first = Joyce M. | year = 2004 | title = Martyrs: Innocence, Vengeance, and Despair in the Middle East | publisher = Palgrave Macmillan | id = ISBN 1403966818
|