Value system
A
value system refers to how an individual or a group of individuals organize their
ethical or
ideological values. A well-defined value system is a
moral code.
One or more people can hold a value system. Likewise, a value system can apply to either one person or many.
* A
personal value system is held by and applied to one individual only.
* A
communal value system is held by and applied to a community/group/society. Some communal value systems can take the form of legal codes or
law.
As a member of a society, group or community, an individual can hold both a personal value system and a communal value system at the same time. In this case, the two value systems (one personal and one communal) are
externally consistent provided they bear no contradictions or situational exceptions between them.
A value system in its own right is
internally consistent when:*its values
do not contradict each other and:*its exceptions are:
abstract enough to be used in all situations and:
consistently applied.
Conversely, a value system by itself is
internally inconsistent if::*its values
contradict each other and:*its exceptions are::*highly
situational and:
inconsistently applied.
Value system consistency can be a value in and of itself. In this case it would be a
meta-value.
Abstract exceptions serve to reinforce the ranking of values. Their definitions are generalized enough to be relevant to any and all situations.
Situational exceptions, on the other hand, are ad hoc and pertain only to specific situations. The presence of a type of exception determines one of two more kinds of value systems:
* An
idealized value system is a listing of values that lacks exceptions. It is, therefore, absolute and can be codified as a strict set of proscriptions on behavior. Those who hold to their idealized value system and claim no exceptions (other than the default) are called
absolutists.
* A
realized value system contains exceptions to resolve contradictions between values in practical circumstances. This type is what people tend to use in daily life.
The difference between these two types of systems can be seen when people state that they hold one value system yet in practice deviate from it, thus holding a different value system. For example, a
religion lists an absolute set of values while the practice of that religion may include exceptions.
Implicit exceptions bring about a third type of value system called a
formal value system. Whether idealized or realized, this type contains an implicit exception associated with each value: "as long as no higher-priority value is violated". For instance, a person might feel that lying is wrong. Since preserving a human life is probably more highly valued than adhering to the principle that lying is wrong, lying to save someone's life is acceptable. Perhaps too simplistic in practice, such a hierarchical structure may warrant explicit exceptions.
First appearing in
Runaround, part of a
science fiction novel by
Isaac Asimov, this value system exemplifies a
realized value system that is
internally consistent and has
abstract exceptions
Three Laws of Robotics #
A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. #
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. #
A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.Although sharing a set of common values, two different parties might not rank those values equally. Also, two parties might disagree as to certain actions are
right or
wrong, both in theory and in practice, and find themselves in an
ideological or physical conflict.
Ethonomics, the discipline of rigorously examining and comparing value systems, enables us to understand
politics and motivations more fully in order to resolve conflicts.
An example conflict would be a value system based on
individualism pitted against a value system based on
collectivism. A rational value system organized to resolve the conflict between two such value systems might take the form below. Note that added exceptions can become
recursive and often convoluted.
*
Individuals may act freely unless their actions harm others or interfere with others' freedom or with functions of society that individuals need, provided those functions do not themselves interfere with these proscribed individual rights and were agreed to by a majority of the individuals.:*
A society (or more specifically the system of order that enables the workings of a society) exists for the purpose of benefiting the lives of the individuals who are members of that society. The functions of a society in providing such benefits would be those agreed to by the majority of individuals in the society.:*
A society may require contributions from its members in order for them to benefit from the services provided by the society. The failure of individuals to make such required contributions could be considered a reason to deny those benefits to them, although a society could elect to consider hardship situations in determining how much should be contributed.:*
A society may restrict behavior of individuals who are members of the society only for the purpose of performing its designated functions agreed to by the majority of individuals in the society, only insofar as they violate the aforementioned values. This means that a society may abrogate the rights of any of its members who fails to uphold the aforementioned values.*
values *
value judgment *
morality *
moral code *
moral values *
applied ethics *
intrinsic value 
