Advanced Math/An 'average' paradox.
Expert: Paul Klarreich - 9/24/2008
QuestionQUESTION: How do I solve this word problem:\
Player A has a higher batting average than player B for the first half of the baseball season. Player A also has a higher battng average than player B for the second half of the season. Is it necessarily true that player A has a higher batting average than player B for the entire season?
ANSWER: Hi, Sarah,
I was unsure of this, so I consulted a well-known mathematician. [I know her very well indeed, having been a part of her life since she was born.]
Here is our conversation: (It is up to you to figure out who Jeter and A-rod are.)
Grandpa Paul Klarreich wrote:
> Hi, Erica,
>
> A 'student' asked: If Jeter has a higher batting average than A-rod in
> the first half of the season, and also in the second half, must he
> have a higher average over the whole season?
>
> Looks obvious, but is this one of those paradoxes?
>
> Love,
>
> Daddy
>
>
Dear Daddy,
It is one of those "paradoxes". Suppose for example the records are:
Jeter:
1st half: 100 hits in 300 at bats -- .333
2nd half: 15 hits in 30 at bats -- .500
A-rod:
1st half: 9 hits in 30 at bats -- .300
2nd half: 149 hits in 300 at bats -- .497
Then A-rod's batting average is higher even though Jeter beats him in each half. You see the principle.
>> Yes. Jeter is 115 for 330, A-rod is 158 for 300.
By the way, I had heard the story that when graduate students leave mathematics to study physics, it increases the average IQ in both departments.
Love,
Eri
------------------
A note for the future (and the present): Normally I don't answer 'private' questions, but this one was interesting enough. Why don't you resubmit it so everyone can see the answer.
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: Thanks for your help, but how do I do this problem if I had to use variables rather than an example?
AnswerQuestioner: Sarah
Private: no
Subject:
Question:
QUESTION: How do I solve this word problem:\
Player A has a higher batting average than player B for the first half of the baseball season. Player A also has a higher battng average than player B for the second half of the season. Is it necessarily true that player A has a higher batting average than player B for the entire season?
ANSWER: Hi, Sarah,
I was unsure of this, so I consulted a well-known mathematician. [I know her very well indeed, having been a part of her life since she was born.]
Here is our conversation: (It is up to you to figure out who Jeter and A-rod are.)
Grandpa Paul Klarreich wrote:
> Hi, Erica,
>
> A 'student' asked: If Jeter has a higher batting average than A-rod in
> the first half of the season, and also in the second half, must he
> have a higher average over the whole season?
>
> Looks obvious, but is this one of those paradoxes?
>
> Love,
>
> Daddy
>
>
Dear Daddy,
It is one of those "paradoxes". Suppose for example the records are:
Jeter:
1st half: 100 hits in 300 at bats -- .333
2nd half: 15 hits in 30 at bats -- .500
A-rod:
1st half: 9 hits in 30 at bats -- .300
2nd half: 149 hits in 300 at bats -- .497
Then A-rod's batting average is higher even though Jeter beats him in each half. You see the principle.
>> Indeed. Jeter is 115 for 330, A-rod is 158 for 330, for the season. What we have is four 'half-season' averages -- in descending order, they are J2, A2, J1, A1. But A2 is close to J2 and over a much larger number of at-bats, i.e. carring a heavier weight in the calculations.
By the way, I had heard the story that when graduate students leave mathematics to study physics, it increases the average IQ in both departments.
Love,
Eri
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: Thanks for your help, but how do I do this problem if I had to use variables rather than an example?
...................................................
Since you are being asked "Is such-and-such always true?" and you are going to answer NO, it is quite appropriate to give a 'counter-example'.
Did you get this problem with some other conditions attached?