Advanced Math/Riemann Integrals
Expert: Paul Klarreich - 12/4/2009
QuestionI am not sure how to start this one.
Suppose that f and g are Riemann integrable on [a,b] and are such that the integral of f from a to b is less than or equal to the integral of g from a to b.
a. Is it true that f(x) is less then or equal to g(x) for all x in [a,b]? Explain.
b. Is it true that f(c) is less then or equal to g(c) for some c in [a,b]? Explain.
I think is part a is true then part b is also true.
AnswerQuestioner: Sam
Country: United States
Category: Advanced Math
Private: No
Subject: Riemann Integrable
Question: I am not sure how to start this one.
Suppose that f and g are Riemann integrable on [a,b] and are such that the integral of f from a to b is less than or equal to the integral of g from a to b.
a. Is it true that f(x) is less then or equal to g(x) for all x in [a,b]? Explain.
b. Is it true that f(c) is less then or equal to g(c) for some c in [a,b]? Explain.
I think is part a is true then part b is also true
..............................................
You are being asked about this theorem (which, being a known theorem, certainly is true):
If f(x) <= g(x) on [a,b], then
{b {b
| f <= | g
{a {a
So part a. of your question is NOT TRUE. Obvious counter-example:
Try f(x) = sin x on [0,pi]. The integral is 2.
Try g(x) = 0.7 on [0,pi]. The integral is 0.7 pi = 2.2 or so.
So g(x) has a bigger integral. But is there any point where sin(x) > 0.7? You answer that.
But part b. of your question is TRUE, because it is exactly the equivalent of the THEOREM above.
You wrote:
Is it true that f(c) is less then or equal to g(c) for some c in [a,b]? Explain.
Well, if f(c) is NEVER <= g(c) on [a,b], then f(c) is ALWAYS > f(c), and then we would have:
{b {b
| f > | g
{a {a