You are here:

- Home
- Science
- Mathematics
- Advanced Math
- Symbolic logic and Venn diagrams.

Advertisement

I want to ask whether my understanding of mathematical statements and their converse, inverse, contrapositive is correct.

I'm trying to visualize these relations by Venn diagrams.

Am I right in doing so?

Let's have statements P and Q.

So when I say P=>Q.

Does it mean: Whenever P is true, it implies Q is always true.

If it is, then I'm imagining P and Q to be 2 circles, like we've in Venn Diagrams, circle representing Q bigger and enclosing a smaller circle representing P.

We can't take P enclosing Q because then there will be some cases where P won't imply Q. So, Q encloses P and Q and P can't be congruent circles as they're different statements.

Now it is very easy to visualize some basic logical facts:

If statement is true then it's contrapositive is also true.

Explanation:

Since Q encloses P, contrapositive states that not Q => not P, which is obvious when we see from Venn diagram.

If converse is true then inverse of same statement is also true.

Explanation:

Converse : Q=>P is true then Inverse : not P=>not Q is actually contrapositive of Q=>P and this time considering that P encloses Q.

It is very easy to visualize through Venn diagrams...but is it the right way?

Thanks

Questioner:Apoorv

Country:India

Category:Advanced Math

Private:Yes --- CORRECTED.

Subject: Symbolic logic.

Question:

I want to ask whether my understanding of mathematical statements and their converse, inverse, contrapositive is correct.

I'm trying to visualize these relations by Venn diagrams.

Am I right in doing so?

>> Looks OK to me.

Let's have statements P and Q.

So when I say P=>Q.

Does it mean: Whenever P is true, it implies Q is always true.

>> Actually it's a 'statement-form' with its own Truth Table, which is filled in like this:

[USE COURIER FONT TO VIEW THIS]

p q p -> q

----+----+-------+

T T T

----+----+-------+

T F FALSE!!

----+----+-------+

F T T

----+----+-------+

F F T

----+----+-------+

>> and if you make these two statements:

1) p -> q is true

2) p is true

then you can conclude that:

3) q is true.

So yes, you are correct. The above is important enough to be given not one, but TWO names:

Law of syllogism.

Modus ponens.

-----------------------------

If it is, then I'm imagining P and Q to be 2 circles, like we've in Venn Diagrams, circle representing Q bigger and enclosing a smaller circle representing P.

>>> I suggest for now, we use small letters for statements and caps for sets.

So small p shall mean: x isin P

---------------------------------------------

'x isin P' is short for 'x is an element of P'

---------------------------------------------

Thus: p -> q means 'If x isin P, then x isin Q', which is really the definition of 'P is a subset of Q'.

------------------------------------------------------

We can't take P enclosing Q because then there will be some cases where P won't imply Q. So, Q encloses P and Q and P can't be congruent circles as they're different statements.

Now it is very easy to visualize some basic logical facts:

If statement is true then it's contrapositive is also true.

>>> you mean "its" with no apostrophe.

You can check this out by constructing the truth table for

-p -> -q

----------------------------------

Explanation:

Since Q encloses P, contrapositive states that not Q => not P, which is obvious when we see from Venn diagram.

If converse is true then inverse of same statement is also true.

>> because the converse and inverse are contrapositives of each other.

Explanation:

Converse : Q=>P is true then Inverse : not P=>not Q is actually contrapositive of Q=>P and this time considering that P encloses Q.

It is very easy to visualize through Venn diagrams...but is it the right way?

>> Looks OK to me.(Did I say that before?)

Thanks

Advanced Math

Answers by Expert:

I can answer questions in basic to advanced algebra (theory of equations, complex numbers), precalculus (functions, graphs, exponential, logarithmic, and trigonometric functions and identities), basic probability, and finite mathematics, including mathematical induction. I can also try (but not guarantee) to answer questions on Abstract Algebra -- groups, rings, etc. and Analysis -- sequences, limits, continuity. I won't understand specialized engineering or business jargon.

I taught at a two-year college for 25 years, including all subjects from algebra to third-semester calculus.**Education/Credentials**

-----------