Advanced Math/Logarithms
Expert: Paul Klarreich - 7/13/2007
QuestionQUESTION: So I'm reviewing all of my precal work from 2 years ago and have become stumped on a very easy looking problem.
How do I solve something like:
Log(4x)=2.
Would I assume it has a base of 10, so it's 10^2=4x which = 100= 4x which = x=25?
Thanks a lot. I need to know as I have a math placement exam very soon!
ANSWER: Questioner: Joe
Category: Advanced Math
Question: So I'm reviewing all of my precal work from 2 years ago and have become stumped on a very easy looking problem.
How do I solve something like:
Log(4x)=2.
Would I assume it has a base of 10, so it's 10^2=4x which = 100= 4x which = x=25?
Thanks a lot. I need to know as I have a math placement exam very soon!
...............................
Hi, Joe,
Yes, that looks right. Usually (at least as of 50 years ago) we wrote:
log (x) for base-10. [Called Briggsian logarithms in those days.]
ln (x) for natural logarithms (base is e) [A.K.A. Naperian logarithms.]
log(sub-b)(x) for any other logarithm.
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: Alright, thanks a lot for clearing that up. Because you're so good, I'm going to ask you a few more questions I came upon as I was reviewing my old work.
Still pertaining to logs, how would I graph:
y=1+log(2x)
How would I solve: 8 x 10^3x = 12. I know I have to log both sides, but what would I do with log8 X 3xlog10 = log12? Do I subtract log8 on both sides to get: 3xlog10= log12-log8? If that's right, am I allowed to then divide by 3log10?
And one last thing: How would I find 3 solutions for: z^3 - 1 = 0.
Thank you for taking the time to help me.
AnswerQuestioner: Joe
Category: Advanced Math
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: Alright, thanks a lot for clearing that up. Because you're so good, I'm going to ask you a few more questions I came upon as I was reviewing my old work.
Still pertaining to logs, how would I graph:
y=1+log(2x)
How would I solve: 8 x 10^3x = 12. I know I have to log both sides, but what would I do with log8 X 3xlog10 = log12? Do I subtract log8 on both sides to get: 3xlog10= log12-log8? If that's right, am I allowed to then divide by 3log10?
And one last thing: How would I find 3 solutions for: z^3 - 1 = 0.
Thank you for taking the time to help me.
.................
Hi, Joe,
y = 1 + log(2x)
For this, I will assume that log means ln. It really makes little difference for the graph.
Write y = 1 + log 2 + log x, and apply your usual graph-transformation rules:
That is, take the simplest graph, y = log x and apply the rule that says:
If you know the graph of y = f(x), and want the graph of y = f(x) + C, elevate the graph vertically by C units. (Depress it, of course, if C is negative.)
In this case, first draw the graph of log x [passes through (1,0), asymptotic to the negative y-axis, and always rising, but curving to the right, and domain is x > 0]
Now just raise the whole thing (1 + log 2) units vertically.
.......................
How would I solve: 8 x 10^3x = 12
I assume you mean 8 (10^3x) = 12
Yes, take the log of both sides, using base 10, but you might as well simplify first.
10^3x = 12/8 = 3/2
Now 3x = log(3/2) and x = (1/3) log(3/2), for which you can use your calculator.
If you go by: log8 * 3xlog10 = log 12, then use the fact that log 10 = 1. (Assuming base-10 logarithms, which you can do here. If YOU are the one taking logs, you get to choose the base.)
Then log 8 * 3x = log 12
3x = log 12 - log 8, which works out to the same thing.
.................................
z^3 - 1 = 0
This has nothing to do with logarithms, but it is part of the standard precalc curriculum.
This is your DeMoivre's theorem stuff. You write:
z^3 = 1
in the 'polar' form of complex numbers.
z = r exp(i@), and
z^3 = r^3 exp(i3@) << application of DeMoivre's theorem.)
Now you write three different forms for 1:
1 = 1 exp(i 0)
1 = 1 exp(i 360) << shouldn't use degrees, but it's easier.
1 = 1 exp(i 720)
And write three equations:
z^3 = r^3 exp(i3@) = 1 exp(i 0)
z^3 = r^3 exp(i3@) = 1 exp(i 360)
z^3 = r^3 exp(i3@) = 1 exp(i 720)
giving three solutions:
r = 1, @ = 0, which is z = 1
r = 1, @ = 120, which is z = 1(cos 120 + i sin 120)
r = 1, @ = 240, which is z = 1(cos 240 + i sin 240)
which you rewrite using your trigonometric diagrams.
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION, still using standard precalc curriculum.
z^3 - 1 = 0
By inspection (a mathematician's term for getting lucky) you can see that z = 1 solves the equation. Therefore, by the Factor Theorem (more standard precalc -- this is getting sickening, you are thinking) the equation can be factored using (z - 1):
(z - 1)(z^2 + z + 1) = 0
Now solve z^2 + z + 1 = 0, using the quadratic formula. You will get imaginary roots:
- 1 +- sqrt(-3)
z = ----------------
2
- 1 +- i sqrt(3)
z = ----------------
2
which is what you would get using the trigonometry.