Advanced Math/Matrix

Advertisement


Question
The inverse of the following matrix can be found by performing a single row operation (once the proper 4x8 matrix has been written down). Indicate what that row operation would be (give your answer in a form such as R5 + 13 R7 or R3 - 17 R2 )

1 0 32 0
0 1  0 0
0 0  1 0
0 0  0 1

Answer
Hi, Kevin,
Your Matrix Question:  The inverse of the following matrix can be found by performing a single row operation (once the proper 4x8 matrix has been written down). Indicate what that row operation would be (give your answer in a form such as R5 + 13 R7 or R3 - 17 R2 )

VIEW THIS IN A FIXED FONT.

1  0 32  0
0  1  0  0
0  0  1  0
0  0  0  1

wants to become the unit matrix, i.e.

1  0  0  0
0  1  0  0
0  0  1  0
0  0  0  1

So we want to get rid of that 32.  We can do it by finding a row that will leave the other elements undisturbed, i.e. has zeroes in the other columns.

Row 3 has just what we want.  All we have to do is multiply row 3 by 32 and subtract it from row 1.  I suppose your notation would require us to say:

R1 = R1 - 32R3  

Advanced Math

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Paul Klarreich

Expertise

I can answer questions in basic to advanced algebra (theory of equations, complex numbers), precalculus (functions, graphs, exponential, logarithmic, and trigonometric functions and identities), basic probability, and finite mathematics, including mathematical induction. I can also try (but not guarantee) to answer questions on Abstract Algebra -- groups, rings, etc. and Analysis -- sequences, limits, continuity. I won't understand specialized engineering or business jargon.

Experience

I taught at a two-year college for 25 years, including all subjects from algebra to third-semester calculus.

Education/Credentials
-----------

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.