Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights/Affirmative action

Advertisement


Question
I have to do a paper on Affirmative action and I have to ask an expert on his/her input and or opinion. I have to questions for you, Do you think that Affirmative action violates the Equal Protection clause? If you do why? If you do not why? Do you think that affirmative action should continue or should it be phased out. Do you think it should be re-instated where it has been outlawed??


Answer
Hello Jenna,

I am certainly glad to assist you.

I do not believe that Affirmative Action violates the Equal Protection clause if the actions contained in the plan to not discriminate.  We all have to be cognizant that AA plans are designed to have affirmative actions taken by companies to ensure equal employment opportunity.  That does not mean quotas but it does mean taking the sometimes extra steps necessary to ensure that applicants are identified and have the opportunity to apply for positions.  Those actions can be through advertising, mentorship programs, succession planning, etc.  There are very rare instances where a quota may be mandated by a court because of a history of discimination by that company and that is why they are ordered to do so for a limited time; however that is not the majority of the time.

As a long time diversity and affirmative action professional, I would love to see the day when this is entirely phased out. There are a myriad of laws in place to ensure equal employment opportunity and when we as a country get to the point of Dr. King's legacy of content of character, then it should be; even the Supreme Court agrees with that.  We have made tremendous progress and I feel we are very close to achieving that goal.  

Affirmative Action has not been outlawed although those institutions that went beyond affirmative action into what would be considered discrimination had their programs either voted out (such as in California universities, et al) or eliminated by Supreme Court decision such as in Michigan.  Giving extra credit because of race is not an affirmative action and was rightfully outlawed.  It is far more equal to consider social economic status in college admissions as a broad spectrum versus assigning extra points for race.  I believe it is the people who can decide that in their own states.

If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.

John

Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


John Fuller

Expertise

I can answer questions pertaining to Affirmative Action, how an affirmative action plan is developed, definitations included within an affirmative action plan, goals versus quotas, misperceptions, rolling out the affirmative action plan with specific action items and areas that are action items. I can answer questions pertaining to Civil Rights violations, investigations of violations and methods and means to be proactive to ensure awareness of civil rights. I am not an attorney and cannot answer or provide information relating to legal, court-related, or case law.

Experience

Experience in the area Diversity,EEO, and Affirmative Action Officer for Johns Hopkins Hospital EEO, Ethics, and Affirmative Action Officer for Fortune 300 Deputy Director, Equal Opportunity for the Department of Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute Organizations Board of Directors, National Council for Support of Disability Issues Board of Direcdtors, Institute for MultiTrack Diplomacy Maryland Association of Affirmative Action Officers Publications Guest expert discussing discrimination, sexual harassment in the workplace and affirmative action on over 45 radio stations nationwide Education/Credentials Doctor of Education Master of Science, Leadership & Business Ethics Master of Arts, Education Virginia and Florida Supreme Court Certified Mediator Department of Defense Certified Mediator

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.