AllExperts > Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights 
Search      
Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About John Fuller
Expertise
I can answer questions pertaining to Affirmative Action, how an affirmative action plan is developed, definitations included within an affirmative action plan, goals versus quotas, misperceptions, rolling out the affirmative action plan with specific action items and areas that are action items. I can answer questions pertaining to Civil Rights violations, investigations of violations and methods and means to be proactive to ensure awareness of civil rights. I am not an attorney and cannot answer or provide information relating to legal, court-related, or case law.

Experience
Experience in the area Diversity,EEO, and Affirmative Action Officer for Johns Hopkins Hospital EEO, Ethics, and Affirmative Action Officer for Fortune 300 Deputy Director, Equal Opportunity for the Department of Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute Organizations Board of Directors, National Council for Support of Disability Issues Board of Direcdtors, Institute for MultiTrack Diplomacy Maryland Association of Affirmative Action Officers Publications Guest expert discussing discrimination, sexual harassment in the workplace and affirmative action on over 45 radio stations nationwide Education/Credentials Doctor of Education Master of Science, Leadership & Business Ethics Master of Arts, Education Virginia and Florida Supreme Court Certified Mediator Department of Defense Certified Mediator

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Political Science > Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights > Ethics Applied to Life

Affirmative Action/Quotas/Civil Rights - Ethics Applied to Life


Expert: John Fuller - 5/24/2009

Question
What are the strongest arguments that a defender of affirmative action could use to rebut the reverse discrimination charge? How persuasive do ou find these argument? Do you agree that even if affirmative action policies discriminate against white men, the potential benefits from affirmative action far outweigh the potential costs? Do you think that this type of cost-benefit analysis is relevant to understanding the ethic of affirmative action?

Answer
Hi Sheri,

Your questions are a source of continual ethical and moral inquiry that permeates the entire equal employment opportunity profession and those who are outside of the profession and affected by it.

To your first question, there is actually no such thing as reverse discrimination.  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects every employee from discrimination based upon national origin, disability, sex, religion, race, or color.  Color is not relegated to colors other than white and is also a  distinguished category from race.  Therefore a white male or white female can bring a charge of racial or color discrimination against another without using the term reverse.  

To your second question, there are no real "affirmative action policies" only those laws that pertain to having an affirmative action plan as required by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.  If you read the actual wording most affirmative action plans that are normally contained within them, the disclaimers abound particularly that the data is basically not necessarily relevant.  That being said, the goals established in affirmative action plans are actually those which are purely business related and reflect market parity.  Market parity as it relates to recruiting is a business recruiting to the actual percentage of minorities who are qualified for the position for which you are applying in your metropolitan recruiting zone.  The key is the word qualified since you are not actually recruiting to the actual percentage of minorities in the recruiting zone but actual qualified.  This of course can be expanded when you are recruiting for executive level position but again it is qualified and not percentage alone.  

I do believe that this type of cost benefit analysis is not only relevant to understanding the ethics of affirmative action but also is an actual cost benefit to a company or institution.  

I do not believe that affirmative action plans can discriminate unless people who use them are ignorant of how they should be constructed or if there are pressures to achieve a quota versus a goal.  If quotas are established (which are not legal unless court ordered), then there would be actual discrimination if one race were hired against another.  Court ordered quotas to remedy past discrimination are acceptable but only for the limited time established by the court.  

The current court case being decided next month by the US Supreme Court may have far reaching implications to the future of affirmative action.  If you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

John

Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.