AllExperts > Ancient/Classical History 
Search      
Ancient/Classical History
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Ancient/Classical History Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Ancient/Classical History Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Ancient/Classical History
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Maria
Expertise
My field of expertise is Ancient Greek and Roman History.

Experience
Over 25 years teaching experience.

Education/Credentials
I received my Ph.D.from Genova University (Italy).

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Homework Help > Ancient/Classical History > Ancient/Classical History > Aristotle's view on tragedy

Ancient/Classical History - Aristotle's view on tragedy


Expert: Maria - 10/20/2008

Question
What is Aristotle's view on tragedy

Answer
Hello,

First of all  you should have asked me this question in the categories Greek or Literature, as it has little to do with history.

Anyway, although it is a very broad question, I’ll try to make a brief summary about Aristotle's views on tragedy.

In his 'Poetics' (written in the late 4th Century BC) Aristotle, who was the first to write a book on how to analyse plays, uses Sophocles’Oedipus the King as a paradigm of a perfect tragedy and  says that ”tragedy is an imitation [Greek, ‘mimesis’] of an action that is serious, complete and of a certain magnitude ….through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation [Greek ‘catharsis’] of these emotions".

In fact he thinks that this purification brings about spiritual renewal or release from tension.

Moreover he lists 6 principal elements  in the structure of tragedy, i.e. 1) plot (Greek ‘mythos’2) character, 3)theme or thought, 4) diction, 5) music, and 6) spectacle, and says that tragedy is an imitation not of men, but of an action and of life, and life consists in action.

In short Aristotle considers the plot to be the soul of a tragedy, with character in second place.
The goal of tragedy is thus not suffering, but the knowledge that issues from it, as the denouement issues from a plot.

Also, Aristotle thinks that  the tragic hero must be neither a villain nor a virtuous man, but a "character between these two extremes, a man who is not eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty [Greek ‘hamartia’]".

This ‘hamartia’ is produced by the 'hybris' (literally, arrogance, overweening behaviour) which is nothing but 'excessive pride and  presumption of the protagonist suggesting impious disregard of the limits governing human action in an orderly universe'.

Finally, the most  powerful elements of emotional interest in tragedy, according to Aristotle, are reversal  of intention or situation (Greek ‘peripéteia’, i.e. a turning point, a change from good fortune to bad fortune) and recognition scenes, so that the hero saw his destiny suddenly reversed from happiness to misery.

Hope this outline can give you a first insight on this interesting matter which however is quite difficult.

Best regards
Maria


Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.