AllExperts > Arbitration/Mediation 
Search      
Arbitration/Mediation
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Arbitration/Mediation Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Arbitration/Mediation Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Arbitration/Mediation
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Timmy Chou
Expertise
I am a experienced Mediator and a partner in a management consulting firm. As a mediator I work as a third-party neutral and specialize in partnership/shareholder disputes, management/labor issues, company culture difficulties, and family-owned business problems. I can help describe why alternative dispute resolution may be a good choice for you. As an experienced management consultant I may be able to offer creative ideas to help resolve your organizational and business problems and disputes. "If you say conflict, I say opportunity".

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Business > Corporate Law > Arbitration/Mediation > dissolving partnership dispute

Arbitration/Mediation - dissolving partnership dispute


Expert: Timmy Chou - 9/28/2009

Question
Hello,
  Myself and business partner of 23 years have decied to go our seperate ways. We have been involved in a S-corporation partnership 50/50 construction business and have done very well, until the mortgage meltdown. The pressures of not enough work have taken its toll.  We are splitting assets (tools, equip, etc.), balance of cash, and I have agreed to let him take his clients with him, (he has the most active clients, mine were developers who have went under) with the exception of a commercial contract that began before we had decided to dissolve. It is a time and material repair contract of estimated $70,000 gross value. I feel I own 50% of it, since it was aquired before we had dissolved, he says it is his since it was generated thru his contact and is taking it. Please give me your input on this matter.  Thanks, bob

Answer
Thank you for your question!

As I always note to questioners, mediators act as neutral third parties to disputes and never "get involved" in judging the merits of conflict, but merely use special techniques to help the parties decide how to negotiate their own settlement.  I am not an attorney and so you may wish to consult one.

When I am asked to participate in dissolutions of these types, I gather together all the assets and value them.  Only THEN am I in a position to determine a recommended distribution.

In this case, the present and future cash value of this contract is definitely an asset of the company.  The question is not "should the contract be split 50/50", but, if it is NOT split, what are getting in EXCHANGE for it.  

The list of valuable assets is clear and your partner should be able to see that using a simple ledger sheet there is an imbalance here.  You may wish to seek out mediation assistance in order to preserve your relationships and avoid an escalation.

Feel free to follow up with additional questions.

For your information, the pros and cons of the types of dispute resolution methods follows.

GOOD LUCK!

Arbitration, Mediation, and Litigation

Arbitration: the referral of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for final and binding determination outside of the judicial system

Benefits of Arbitration:
 Confidential, no public record
 Limited exchange of documentation, information
 Quick, don't have to wait for a court date
 Arbitrators have expertise in the subject matter and are trained in conflict resolution
 Cheaper than litigation
 Preserves business relationships

Negatives of Arbitration

 It's a compromise, no 100% winner
 Complex arbitration can be costly
 If not satisfied, may litigate the arbitration procedure
 Poor results with an unskilled arbitrator
 Both parties must agree to cooperate in the process

Mediation: the process by which parties submit their dispute to a neutral third party (the mediator) who works with the parties to reach a settlement of their dispute.

Benefits of Mediation:

 Neutral mediator can objectively suggest alternatives not considered before
 Parties are directly engaged in negotiating the settlement
 Can be quicker than litigation
 Less costly than litigation
 Preserves business relationships
 85% of American Arbitration Association cases mediated find successful solutions

Negatives of Mediation

 may not reach a binding decision
 unskilled mediator

Litigation: using the judicial system to resolve disputes

Benefits of litigation:

 a clear winner and loser
 uses a prescribed set of procedures
 more predictable outcomes
 is final

Negatives of Litigation:

 waiting for court dates can do more harm
 usually more expensive than mediation and arbitration
 part of the public record

Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.