Arbitration/Mediation/Petition
Expert: Timmy Chou - 10/20/2003
QuestionHello
I know this question may not be in your profile but I cant find one that really pertains to my problem.If you would read it i would be thankful.
My problem is I want to write a petition for the occupants that live along a section of a 2 lane state road that runs through a village.
Everone agrees that the speed is too fast on this stretch of road ,even the state police agree but cant do a thing about it really.The state of Mich DOT has been promising to look into this for at least five years and they do absolutly nothing.
My question is the wording of the petition,I am having a hard time trying to figure out the correct way to word it.
everyone will sign it but no one will chip in for an attorney to help with this. So I thought I would take it on myself a bit and maybe I can stir things up a bit with a petition .
Sincerely
Mark Burchard
answerseeker49@hotmail.com
AnswerThank you for your question!
Mediators act as neutral third parties to disputes and never "get involved" in judging the merits of conflict, but merely use special techniques to assist the parties in solving dilemmas.
I do not believe the specific wording of the petition is critical to your quest. However, it would be useful to do enough research into the problem to figure out what solutions are really possible. It would be best to collect signatures about a solution that is practically a reality. For example, there may be ample precedent for the installation of speed bumps, but changing the speed limit may be only up to DOT by law. Therefore a petition to install speed bumps would be far more useful. Of course, a general petition complaining about the speed is not likely to get attention. Provide solutions if you want the problem addressed and get people to sign a petition that can be implemented.
These are some ideas. Feel free to follow up with additional questions.
The pros and cons of the types of dispute resolution methods follows.
GOOD LUCK!
Arbitration, Mediation, and Litigation
Arbitration: the referral of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for final and binding determination outside of the judicial system
Benefits of Arbitration:
Confidential, no public record
Limited exchange of documentation, information
Quick, don't have to wait for a court date
Arbitrators have expertise in the subject matter and are trained in conflict resolution
Cheaper than litigation
Preserves business relationships
Negatives of Arbitration
It's a compromise, no %100 winner
Complex arbitration can be costly
If not satisfied, may litigate the arbitration procedure
Poor results with an unskilled arbitrator
Both parties must agree to cooperate in the process
Mediation: the process by which parties submit their dispute to a neutral third party (the mediator) who works with the parties to reach a settlement of their dispute.
Benefits of Mediation:
Neutral mediator can objectively suggest alternatives not considered before
Parties are directly engaged in negotiating the settlement
Can be quicker than litigation
Less costly than litigation
Preserves business relationships
85% of American Arbitration Association cases mediated find successful solutions
Negatives of Mediation
may not reach a binding decision
unskilled mediator
Litigation: using the judicial system to resolve disputes
Benefits of litigation:
a clear winner and loser
uses a prescribed set of procedures
more predictable outcomes
is final
Negatives of Litigation:
waiting for court dates can do more harm
usually more expensive than mediation and arbitration
part of the public record