Arbitration/Mediation/bad debt
Expert: Timmy Chou - 6/17/2003
QuestionMy wife received a letter informing of impending legal proceedings for a $1400 debt owed to her school for books from 6 years ago. She has not been able to pay off this debt and is now faced with the situation of responding withen 14 days or face court which could result in the garnishment of her wages. I have a few points wich might help you with your advice in this matter. One, the letter is in her maiden name, not her legal current name (though she did open the letter). Two, she did not receive her practicum which was part of her program at the college. Three, she will be asking for a detailed statment of all the books owing and how much is owing on each book immediatily. Four, the debt is now 6 years old.
Is there any advice you can help us with? PS. canadian
AnswerThank you for your question!
Mediators act as neutral third parties to disputes and never "get involved" in judging the merits of conflict, but merely use special techniques to help the parties decide how to negotiate their own settlement.
I am not an attorney but can give you some advice based on my business consulting experience. Note that this issue may have binding legal ramifications and you may wish to consult an attorney.
Because this matter has progressed so far it sounds to me as though your wife has been informed of the existence of the debt claim, and may in fact not contest it. Usually consumer law permits you some time to be notified about the debt and to contest the validity of the debt before proceeding to court.
There is likely to be very little you can do to avoid having to appear as the time to try to negotiate has passed for the school. Schools will usually hire a collection company to go after these debts and these folks could care less about you.
As far as your defenses: one, the name change does not matter; two, there is likely some small print in your agreement with the school that prevents you from withholding payment in one area from the school because of a dispute in another area; three, your wife would be entitled to a detailed statement but if she knew about the debt and did not request one before it may not be enough to delay the proceeding; four, it is likely there is no limiting statute with respect to a debt of this type or else the "fine print" waives your right to claim it.
I wish I had better news. My advice is to immediatly call the school and try to get a payment agreement set up and forestall any judgement.
These are some ideas. Feel free to follow up with additional questions.
For your general information, the pros and cons of the types of dispute resolution methods follows.
GOOD LUCK!
Arbitration, Mediation, and Litigation
Arbitration: the referral of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for final and binding determination outside of the judicial system
Benefits of Arbitration:
Confidential, no public record
Limited exchange of documentation, information
Quick, don't have to wait for a court date
Arbitrators have expertise in the subject matter and are trained in conflict resolution
Cheaper than litigation
Preserves business relationships
Negatives of Arbitration
It's a compromise, no %100 winner
Complex arbitration can be costly
If not satisfied, may litigate the arbitration procedure
Poor results with an unskilled arbitrator
Both parties must agree to cooperate in the process
Mediation: the process by which parties submit their dispute to a neutral third party (the mediator) who works with the parties to reach a settlement of their dispute.
Benefits of Mediation:
Neutral mediator can objectively suggest alternatives not considered before
Parties are directly engaged in negotiating the settlement
Can be quicker than litigation
Less costly than litigation
Preserves business relationships
85% of American Arbitration Association cases mediated find successful solutions
Negatives of Mediation
may not reach a binding decision
unskilled mediator
Litigation: using the judicial system to resolve disputes
Benefits of litigation:
a clear winner and loser
uses a prescribed set of procedures
more predictable outcomes
is final
Negatives of Litigation:
waiting for court dates can do more harm
usually more expensive than mediation and arbitration
part of the public record