AllExperts > Experts 
Search      
Arbitration/Mediation
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Arbitration/Mediation Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Arbitration/Mediation
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Timmy Chou
Expertise
I am a experienced Mediator and a partner in a management consulting firm. As a mediator I work as a third-party neutral and specialize in partnership/shareholder disputes, management/labor issues, company culture difficulties, and family-owned business problems. I can help describe why alternative dispute resolution may be a good choice for you. As an experienced management consultant I may be able to offer creative ideas to help resolve your organizational and business problems and disputes. "If you say conflict, I say opportunity".

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Business > Corporate Law > Arbitration/Mediation > delay in COE due to dispute the sellers.

Arbitration/Mediation - delay in COE due to dispute the sellers.


Expert: Timmy Chou - 6/19/2006

Question
We are ready to sign the escrow documents this week on a condo purchase in a new development and we have just been informed by escrow that the COE may well be delayed due to a dispute between the sellers resulting in one of the sellers refusing to sigh off. What should I do at this point?
Also we are concerned as our locked-in laon rate will expire on June 26th.      
Thank You,
Rudy Betancourt


Answer
Thank you for your question!

Mediators act as neutral third parties to disputes and never "get involved" in judging the merits of conflict, but merely use special techniques to help the parties decide how to negotiate their own settlement.

The case you describe here is unfortunately very typical.  I am not a lawyer, nor can I mediate your dispute with just you alone but I can respond to your question from my consulting experience.  Note that this issue may have legal implications and you should consult an attorney.

Your contract should be explicit that failure to close on the agreed upon date, absent any written amendment from you, would be a breach of the contract.  You would therefore be entitled to walk away and get your down payment returned.  If you walk away you are still stuck with some of the loan origination fees such as appraisal and inspection fees you have already paid, and yes, if you pass your lock date you will lose the locked rate.

You may have some opportunity to negotiate some concessions at this point from the Seller.  In other words, if you can get them to agree to cover your fees or come down in price to offset your loan lock adjustment, you will then provide another period of time to get to closing.  

If they do not agree then your only choice is to notify  them that they are in breach of the contract and consider it void.  You would then have other remedies at law to sue them to recover your damages from the breach, but you cannot force them to do anything to close if they are unwilling to do so.  

These are some ideas.  Feel free to follow up with additional questions.

For your information, the pros and cons of the types of dispute resolution methods follows.

GOOD LUCK!

Arbitration, Mediation, and Litigation

Arbitration: the referral of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for final and binding determination outside of the judicial system

Benefits of Arbitration:

    Confidential, no public record
    Limited exchange of documentation, information
    Quick, don't have to wait for a court date
    Arbitrators have expertise in the subject matter and are trained in conflict resolution
    Cheaper than litigation
    Preserves business relationships

Negatives of Arbitration

    It's a compromise, no %100 winner
    Complex arbitration can be costly
    If not satisfied, may litigate the arbitration procedure
    Poor results with an unskilled arbitrator
    Both parties must agree to cooperate in the process

Mediation: the process by which parties submit their dispute to a neutral third party (the mediator) who works with the parties to reach a settlement of their dispute.

Benefits of Mediation:

    Neutral mediator can objectively suggest alternatives not considered before
    Parties are directly engaged in negotiating the settlement
    Can be quicker than litigation
    Is confidential, no record
    Less costly than litigation
    Preserves business and family relationships
    85% of American Arbitration Association cases mediated find successful solutions

Negatives of Mediation

    may not reach a binding decision
    unskilled mediator

Litigation: using the judicial system to resolve disputes

Benefits of litigation:

    a clear winner and loser
    uses a prescribed set of procedures
    more predictable outcomes
    is final

Negatives of Litigation:

    waiting for court dates can do more harm
    usually more expensive than mediation and arbitration
    part of the public record

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.