Astronomy/STAR CLOUDS IN RELATION TO BLACK HOLES
Expert: Jayendra Upadhye - 7/28/2004
QuestionDEAR JAYENDRA,
(PLEASE EXCUSE GRAMMER & THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME)
1. BASED ON THE STATEMENT (FACT) THAT THE CREATION IS WITHOUT BEGINNING AND WITH OUT END, (A CONCEPT I HAD TO STRUGGLE WITH UNTIL VIEWING THE HUBBLE DEEP FIELD PHOTO)
2.BASED ON THE PROVEN THEORY (FACT) THAT NATURE DOES NOT WASTE.
3.BASED ON ASTRONOMERS THEORY THAT MATTER PULLED DOWN A BLACK HOLE WOULD BE CRUSHED TO THE TEXTURED REFINEMENT OF CIGARETTE SMOKE.
IS IT NOT POSSIBLE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE OCCURRING?
1. BLACK HOLES ARE DEFINATLY THE RECYCLE BINS OF THE UNIVERSE.
2. THAT MATTER MATCHING OR EXCEEDING THE SPEED OF LIGHT GOING INTO A BLACK HOLE COULD BE SPEWING THE EXHAUST ANYWHERE IN THE PRESENT, PAST, OR FUTURE LOCATIONS IN THE UNIVERSE AS A "CLOUD"
THUS REBUILDING ON THE "FRONT END" OR "BACK" END.
IF IT TRAVELS FURTHER FORWARD THEN THE
"PRESENT FRONT END", A MORE DISTANT FUTURE IS BUILT, FURTHER BACK THEN THE "BACK END", A MORE DISTANT PAST IS BUILT.
3. "WITHOUT BEGINNING AND WITHOUT END" THE CLOUDS VIEWED AS "STAR BEDS" BEGIN THE PROCESS OF LIFE OVER AGAIN WITH THE BIRTH OF STARS, PLANETS, AND GALAXIES ??
PLEASE RESPOND. (SENT 7/28/2004)
PETER MASTELLONE
995 48TH AVE
VERO BEACH FL. 32966
772-978-1335
AnswerHello Peter,
Before I answer that nice question..
Are you a virgo? Because no one else so far have been fastidious enough to include his full name, address, and even the 'sent'date into their question! Keep it up! :)
Now to your question...
1 - If you mean end in time / space, we do not say that for sure. Because if there is enough matter in the universe, it will oscillate between a series of bangs and crunches, and each "creation" will be different and unique, with a different set of physical laws each time. If it does not have enough matter, it will fade away and die..In either case, whatever "creation" one refers to is but a "transient" one ..(transient..fleeting).
ONE FACT is true though ..the universe is CENTERLESS it favours al points equally! :)
Now about BLACK HOLES being recycle bins..Peter THAT is NOT a KNOWN AND VERIFIED fact!
2 - The second part is also conjecture! How are we ever going to verify THAT? unless WE OURSELVES MANAGE TO BE what in sanskrit is called "TRI-KAAL-DNYANIS" or knowers of the 3 aspects of time! As of now, we are just stuck to our present. Astronomers do get to view past states of the universe, but how does one LABEL or TAG matter that goes down a particular hole and then re-identify it as it comes out ..say in the past..as a cloud or whatever? There simply IS no way!
3 - Peter ofcourse all stars begin in nebulae or clouds..but those clouds are not themselves the product of any spewing black holes, but rather the remnants of the bang! they are the primordial hydrogen from the bang, now part of one or the other galaxy. the current evolved state of the universe is SPONGIFORM with huge voids of absloute (almost) vacuum and thing bridges of dense matter in form of galatic bridges as seen in the coma - virgo cluster of galaxies.
Sorry!
Dont mean to upset you..I have my own pet conjectures (..who doesnt?)..about DARK MATTER, that i laugh at, when i am all "professional" but stick to nevertheless.
But back to reality..
There is not enough EVIDENCE to support points 1 thru 3, and these will remain in the realm of conjecture unless proven other wise.
But you have able supporters! Fred Hoyle and Bondi and Naralikar had come up with a theory of "continuous creation of matter" in an expanding universe that was static i mean essentially unchanging in its composition everywhere. try and red up matter on that front. Intersting reading Hoyles book "the first and last frontier" makes interesting reading.
Jayen
post script:- Read "thing bridges" as "thin bridges"..i havent the foggiest how that "g" got there..
Jayen