Expert: Bob - 5/17/2006

Question
My query is with regard to:
1) How to conduct rational, sensible, open and understandable debate and discussion on different interpretations of ethics?
2) The importance of science and mathematics that support each other in debate and discussion as mentioned in 1).  For example for a debate or discussion giving a number out of 100 to represent adherence to science and mathematics that support each other?
3) How to initiate and maximise good and constructive thought, even better such communication, and even better such actions.

Answer
Hello Pja,

  Your query is not in a form that requires an answer. From these discussion topics I gather that you are attempting to set guidelines for a debate. From your objectives I would imagine that prejudice and preconceived misconceptions will be your biggest obstacles on all fronts. If you have an actual question please feel free to resubmit.

Bob