You are here:

Auditing/sales tax audit

Advertisement


Question
If my audit is from 2003 - 2004 can they request informtation and documentation from 2001 and 2002?  Why are they going out of the boundaries?  They only asked for 2 things from 2005 which I have.

Answer
Elizabeth,

Unfortunately, the auditors can ask for anything. However, you have a valid point in that if it is outside the scope of the audit, why would they ask for it?  It is possible they have found an exception (a negative finding) and they want to determine how long it has been going on so they can assess the appropriate penalty.  Ten again, they may simply be curious.

As the 'auditee', you are certainly entitled to full disclosure and can, even should, ask for an explanation.  If they refuse, you should tell them the audit is halted and they must leave your business until they provide a supervisor or manager for you to speak with.  Then you can seek a full explanation.  If the auditors are going outside the scope of the audit, their management will not be pleased.

------------
I am not a tax person but I can give you generic advice regarding being audited regardless of the reason or situation.  In your particular case, Sales tax audits are typically designed to determine if you have been appropriately collecting sales tax on your sales and turning that money over to the correct agency.

Auditing is a simple process (in theory) of comparing “what is” to “what should be”.

You can expect the auditors will want to identify “what is”. In other words, they will either want to see your sales records that show amount of sales, amount of tax collected, and who they buyer was.  They may already have a list of your sales from some other source... they may even have some reason to suspect that you are really selling retail and they are not receiving any tax revenue like they should. Lack of records can hurt you because the law in most states requires that you maintain auditable records - especially for wholesale and retail operations.

Generally speaking, as an “auditee” you have more control of the environment than you might imagine...

You must realize that the person auditing you is doing so for some reason.  Something is suspicious, you were chosen at random, or someone has given them a tip about you (a disgruntled employee, an unhappy customer, a competitor, a jilted lover, whoever).

If you have operated in good faith and made an effort to comply with law, there may not be any problem, they may just want to see some documented proof of your decisions regarding sales tax.  One of the key things auditors look for is “reasonableness”. In other words, even if you lack documented proof (receipts, records, etc), you may still be able to convince them of your legitimate actions provided you are reasonable in your transactions.

The audit process is generally that they will have an “Entrance conference” with you where they explain the objectives of the audit, the criteria they will use (the “what should be” as mentioned above), the time frame under audit, the expected time they will take conducting your audit, the documents you need to provide, and they should entertain any questions you might have.  You should be prepared to ask why they are auditing you, what their methodology is, how will they determine if you are in violation of law, you should insist that they validate their findings with you prior to including them in any report.  You should ask about how you will resolve any disagreements with them, what is the procedure for escalating the issues to their bosses.  You should also obtain the name and telephone of their supervisor.  It would be appropriate to call their supervisor (but not on speaker) while they sit across the desk from you.  You should verify the auditor’s name, the objective of the audit, and ask the supervisor “why me????”

Know this; the person auditing you is typically under VERY GREAT pressure to produce results quickly.  That is the bad thing about being an auditor – the boss is always, ALWAYS, pushing to work faster.  Since you know this, you should use it to your advantage.  It is better for the auditor to write a clean report, let you go, and move on to the next audit than to spend too much time with you without getting results.  You can manage this by doing the following:

1) NEVER be belligerent or argumentative or uncooperative.

2) Don’t be too smart – be a little dumb so they have to explain everything to you twice.

3) Always be courteous and helpful but very, very slow. Whatever they need – you are very happy to give to them but you don’t have it with you (maybe it is off site and you will have to retrieve it from somewhere else)... make a note of what they need.  Make the note wrong so you will return with the wrong thing.

4) When you return with the wrong thing, make them explain everything all over again as if you don’t understand. Show them the note you wrote down before to prove that you are trying your best to give them what they want but it is all so confusing.

The point is that they know that the boss will be looking at the number of hours they are spending on your case and they will soon give up – unless your tax situation is really bad or you simply got caught being dishonest and they want to go for big bucks or make an example of you.

Remember; be helpful and friendly but ever so slow, slow, slow.

Auditing

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Don Sadler

Expertise

I can answer regarding Internal Auditing - especially operational audits, audit management, and how to revitalize a dysfunctional audit department. Also give advice to "auditees" on how to deal with auditors.

I DO NOT ANSWER HOMEWORK OR CLASS PROJECT QUESTIONS. For those answers, I suggest you scan previously asked questions and search on your favorite search engine.

I ALSO DO NOT ANSWER TAX QUESTIONS AS THIS IS NOT WITHIN MY EXPERTISE. NOTE: I am not an accounting expert although i will try to help if I can... ask at your own risk.

Experience

I have worked in the public and private business management arena with experience in OMB, Resource Management, Internal Auditing and consulting. I am a former President of the Inland Empire Chapter Institute of Internal Auditors, previously held Director positions in the Orange County Information Systems Audit and Control Association and the Northern Telecom International User's Association. I am a Certified Fraud Examiner and a Certified Information Systems Auditor.

Organizations
Institute of Internal Auditors, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, and Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA)

Education/Credentials
MBA, CISA, CFE

Founder and Principal of Applied INTEGRITY Management Consulting Group

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.