You are here:

Auto Insurance Claims/Insurance outcome

Advertisement


Question
Recently I was involved in an accident where I was at fault. I was at a stop light moving forward to close the gap when I bumped another car going no more than 5 miles per hour. At the scene, the police put on the report no property damage because neither of our cars had any scratches or dents. The lady I hit was pulled out of the car onto a stretcher complaining of back and neck problems. I live in florida and I only have 10/20 coverage. My insurance told me so far that the lady has gotten a lawyer and pretty much shes going to try to milk it for all its worth. (Shes on welfare, no job, single mom) Iam not aware if she has any injuries but from a single bump that didnt even mark either of our cars I'm sure she cant be too hurt. My question is... what is the worst possible outcome and what do you predict will happen?? I was told that once my bodily injury coverage runs out (only $10k) that she can come after me if she has injuries but I'm only 20 years old, I work as a waitress, go to school, live with my parents and have no assets. So what do you think the outcome will be? Whats the worst outcome also?
Thanks so much!
Shannon

Answer
Hello Shannon,

Unfortunately, it is difficult to opine in your situation without knowing all the details.

I will give you some very general information however. I understand that you don't have a lot of money and what you will need to do is let this play out for a while. Your insurance company is going to look out for you for the first $10K.

There are many crooks out there to lazy to work that will claim soft tissue injuries and the reason is because it is hard to prove.

If I were you, this is what I would do. If this person is seeking more than $10K, then it is time for you to get a P.I. and an attorney.

Check her background (easy to do these days) and see if she has pulled this before. It should be very interesting for her claim being she is on welfare and does not work. She can't claim future lost wages because if she was on welfare, she wouldn't work anyway. As for injuries, I would follow up on the treatment she received. If it is just to a chiro, her claim may be looked at with more scrutiny.

If she does have surgury, I would be looking for pre-existing damage she had to her body before the accident. Could be she pulled this before which makes her damaged goods and causes question to the claim.

Now, not being racist I will use the term that insurance companies used in fighting fraud "Nigerian auto fraud." In this scenario, these people had doctors and lawyers lined up for fake injuries to scam the insurance company. It's very common. Many articles throughout the insurance industry were written about these matters.

Now, your insurance company will do research on this person as well because they have to defend you to the $10K.

I smypathize with you. I understand your fear about this ruining the rest of your life. This is a catch 22 because if you had higher limits, they would have just gone for more money and you would be in the same situation.

I doubt very much that a judge would let someone with no income have a windfall at your expense.

All you can do is wait and see where it goes.

Rob

Auto Insurance Claims

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Rob Painter, Ase, CFEI, CAFATE

Expertise

Please remember. I am not an attorney and cannot legal advice. My answers are based on my experience due to litigation I have been involved in as an expert, for both insurance companies and while oposing them opposing them. I deal with only comprehensive claims on autos related to fire and theft. I have even had the opportunity to rewrite policy coverage language as it relates to vehicle theft and forced entry for insurance defense attorneys.

Experience

Experience in the area: Working with insurance companies and attorneys on these issues for over 20 years. It is very common to have a reported stolen car with a so-called factory anti-theft system to have the theft claim denied. I have served successfully as an expert witness in the courts across the US representing the insured and their attorney revealing that the insurance expert did not take all known theories into consideration before rendering their "Forensic" conclusion. Many insurance carriers us independent "Forensic" experts to examine reported stolen vehicles commonly using flawed methodology implicating the innocent insured with the theft. My job is to determine if the insurance expert reached his conclusions based on accepted scientific principals or just net opinion with no basis other than opinion. My case record against such experts is very compelling.My resume can be seen at the catagory "Auto Theft and Prevention." In "Forensics" the scientific method must be employed. In the forensic locksmith field determining how a reported stolen vehicle was last operated, many processes cannot be duplicated and are conveniently not addressed. If they were, juries would have the opportunity to make a fair and impartial opinion at least about what the expert could or could not prove. There is a purported process determining the last key used. The chances of determining such is very rare uless the key is found in the ignition lock. Experts commonly destroy evidence as well and are rarely questioned on this event. I reveal the weakness in their testimony on such instances.

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.