You are here:

Bankruptcy Law/settlement threatened with bankruptcy

Advertisement


Question
We are suing a builder who abandoned our house construction with more
than $100,000 in overpayments. In pre-trial, he admitted to taking most of
what we trying to recover, but offered to settle for about 5% of the amount to
be paid over time. His attorney threatened that if we continue the case to
trial, the builder will simply declare bankruptcy and we will get nothing (some
payments were made to him personally and not his dba company). Our
question is, if we win a judgement against him, would it definitely be excused
if he files bankruptcy, or if we can show that he intentionally stole from us in
bankruptcy court, could the judgement be exempt from discharge? Our
current attorney doesn't handle bankruptcy cases, so we need some quick
advice to decide if we should press ahead with the suit this week. thank you.

Answer
I am terribly sorry that you are going through this. I am sure you realize there is so much to this story that I don't know about, that the best I can do is raise some questions and give you a flavor of my own thinking.  

So, the defendant threatens to file bankruptcy if he looses, (nothing unusual, defendants always say that). How seriously should you take the threat?

Did anyone bother to make an asset investigation, (including fraudulent asset transfers) before getting involved in the expense and trouble of a lawsuit? If so, you would know how seriously you should take his threat. If you have not done it yet, perhaps there is still time to do so before you throw good money after bad.

Personally, if what you are saying had happened to me, I would not take the 5%, but you and your lawyer have to decide that for yourselves. I would get greater satisfaction in watching the SOB file bankruptcy than I would get from recovering $5,000. Besides, your claim might also result in the guy loosing his contractor's license. Incidentally, have you made a claim against his contractor's bond?

How did he get the $100,000 away from you? You don't say how that happened. Perhaps your bank was negligent in allowing him to draw down from a construction account, and maybe you can sue the bank?  

Chapter 7 bankruptcy does not discharge every kind of debt. If we look at Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, it sets forth a laundry list of different types of obligations that are not dischargeable. The best way to understand the likely difference between the dischargeable debts and the non-dischargeable debts are to think of acts committed by the debtor which amount to intentional wrongs (intentional torts). Generally, intentional acts of wrongdoing, such as fraud, are not dischargeable. However, even if you believe that the debt owed to you is non-dischargeable, you still have to jump through hoops and hurdles in the bankruptcy court to prove it!

It is not possible to ever give someone a guarantee that the debt will "definately" be discharged or not. I suggest you buy an hour of time for a consultation with a good local bankruptcy attorney for an evaluation of the dischargeability question.

Bankruptcy Law

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Los Angeles Bankruptcy Lawyer Leon D. Bayer

Expertise

Leon Bayer has successfully represented clients in bankruptcy for over 30 years. He is frequently called upon by the media, the California Bar and other associations to provide insight and help educate attorneys on bankruptcy issues. If you or other readers want to keep up with my blog postings about life in and out of bankruptcy, you can follow my blog at http://www.bankruptcyblogger.org/ and my personal web site at http://www.debt-relief-bankruptcy.com and A Human Guide to Bankruptcy at http://www.thebankruptcyguide.net/ Leon also writes about bankruptcy law for Nolo, see http://www.nolo.com/law-authors/leon-bayer.html and his "Ask Leon" bankruptcy law blog column at http://blog.nolo.com/bankruptcy/

Experience

Leon is a Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law by the State Bar of California, and has been a practicing bankruptcy lawyer in Los Angeles, California for 33 years.

Organizations
National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Lawyers, California Bar Association, Los Angeles County Bar Association.

Publications
Author, ?The Essentials Of Chapter 13,? Daily Journal Report, December 18, 1987.
Contributing Editor, Basic Bankruptcy, California Practice Handbook, Matthew Bender 1992, 1993.
CEB Consultant, CEB-Personal and Small Business Bankruptcy Practice in California, 2003.


Education/Credentials
B.A., J.D.

Awards and Honors
President, 1995-1996-Los Angeles Bankruptcy Forum; Member - Los Angeles County Bar Association Committee on Commercial Law & Bankruptcy, 1988. Law Advisory
Commission-Personal & Small Business Bankruptcy Law of the State Bar of California, 1996-2000

MR. BAYER SAYS: The big banks and credit card companys have been working overtime for many years to undermine the Consitutional right of the American people to be able to claim bankruptcy protection. In 2005 the banking lobby successfully convinced Congress and the President to make the laws and proceedures more complicated, hopeing that it will stymie legitimate people from filing bankruptcy. They succeeded in gaining these complex new legal proceedures by greasing the legislative system with hundreds of millions of dollars in "campaign contributions." The good news for the American people is that while the new laws have made the proceedures needlessly complex to the point where inexperienced people can't help but trip over the maze of new rules and regulations, the process is still doable, especially with a lawyer who is well trained and experienced in this specialty.

Past/Present Clients
I have probably handled something on the order of about 15,000 bankruptcy cases thropughout my career.

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.