You are here:

Bankruptcy Law/Chapter 13 and Credit Report

Advertisement


Question
QUESTION: My husband filed a chapter 13 in January. As we live in California, our attorney advised us that I was not allowed to pay my own debts and that they must be included in the bankruptcy due to community property laws. I have informed all of my creditors of this repeatedly. Only now, after 8 months have they stopped calling me. However, I pulled my credit report and saw that all of my creditors are listing my debts as "Charged off/Bad debt." When I pulled my husbands credit, his creditors list his debts as "Unrated" and reference his chapter 13 payment plan. His credit score is almost 100 points higher than mine. I tried to dispute it directly through the credit bureau who said they verified all the information and will not change it.

Is that correct? Can they report me as charged off even though my debts are being handled through my husbands bankruptcy? Why would I, a non-filing spouse, be punished more than the one who actually filed the bankruptcy? Would this be a violation of the automatic stay?

Leon Bayer
Leon Bayer  
ANSWER: I am sorry that you are dealing with such a frustrating situation. Unfortunately, the credit report sounds like it is accurate and correct because it is reporting true facts.

As soon as you stop paying your debts, it is predictable that your credit score will plunge. What I do not understand is why in the world your debts are included in the bankruptcy, but you did not file? If you can shed some light on that it might help me to give you some guidance.

---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------

QUESTION: I worked in finance and was concerned about having the bankruptcy on my credit report. Our attorney advised us that I did not have to file, but because we lived in California which is a community property state my debts were included with my husband's whether or not I filed. In fact, he specifically told me not to pay on my debts once we decided to move forward with the bankruptcy and that they would be discharged with my husbands. He called it a "Phantom discharge." I would have paid on my debts the whole time, but I was told in no uncertain terms that I could not pay on them. That all secured debts had to be treated the same. And that community property meant that my husband and I share all property, income and debt, so my debts are his debts and go with the bankruptcy.

Was I completely mislead? What can I do now? We are stuck in this chapter 13 with no money for me to pay on my debts each month. And if in fact the debts are not going to be discharged, then I am in a worse place because I have these charge offs and cannot even pay on them.

Answer
Leon Bayer
Leon Bayer  
I don't like to second guess a fellow attorney unless I have reviewed the complete file and have a personal consultation with the client. However, in this case I think I will "second guess."

There are ribbons of truth in what your lawyer has told you about the "phantom discharge" and the relationship between community property and community debt. So far, so good. However the "phantom discharge" is very limited in scope, (see Bankruptcy Code §524(a)(3), and it protects the community property interests of a non filing spouse in marital property after the filing spouse receives a discharge. However, this limited protection exists only so long as you remain married and living together. Further drawbacks are that after the filing spouse receives a discharge, creditors still have the right to collect from the non filing spouse, (collection letters, collection calls, and even including suing you plus keeping your credit in a state of ruin for a long time - but with the limitation that they can not execute a court judgement to collect the debts out of community property assets. They can execute a judgement against any separate property asset that belongs to you.

You were concerned about having a bankruptcy on your credit report. So instead, you don't have bankruptcy on your report, but your credit is ruined anyway. I think it added up to the same thing, bankruptcy or no bankruptcy. If I had been your lawyer, I would have strongly encouraged both of you to file together. If an employer cares about hiring only someone with good credit, you still missed the boat, even though you did not file bankruptcy.

You might consider filing your own 13 at this point so that you will have full protection, and there is even a procedure to have your case jointly administered with your husband's case.

One more question: Why was a 13 filed instead of a 7? It might even be possible for you to file a 7 at this time, while your husband stays in Chapter 13. However, before you do any such filing, 13 or 7, you need the advice and representation of a really super duper BK specialist to find out what your options are. Sadly, I suspect very few lawyers who practice consumer bankruptcy will have the expertise and knowledge to understand joint administration or to set you on the best path.

Anyone who wants to do some further general reading on bankruptcy can read my Bankruptcy Guide at http://www.debt-relief-bankruptcy.com/guide-new.asp

Bankruptcy Law

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Los Angeles Bankruptcy Lawyer Leon D. Bayer

Expertise

Leon Bayer has successfully represented clients in bankruptcy for over 30 years. He is frequently called upon by the media, the California Bar and other associations to provide insight and help educate attorneys on bankruptcy issues. If you or other readers want to keep up with my blog postings about life in and out of bankruptcy, you can follow my blog at http://www.bankruptcyblogger.org/ and my personal web site at http://www.debt-relief-bankruptcy.com and A Human Guide to Bankruptcy at http://www.thebankruptcyguide.net/ Leon also writes about bankruptcy law for Nolo, see http://www.nolo.com/law-authors/leon-bayer.html and his "Ask Leon" bankruptcy law blog column at http://blog.nolo.com/bankruptcy/

Experience

Leon is a Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law by the State Bar of California, and has been a practicing bankruptcy lawyer in Los Angeles, California for 33 years.

Organizations
National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Lawyers, California Bar Association, Los Angeles County Bar Association.

Publications
Author, ?The Essentials Of Chapter 13,? Daily Journal Report, December 18, 1987.
Contributing Editor, Basic Bankruptcy, California Practice Handbook, Matthew Bender 1992, 1993.
CEB Consultant, CEB-Personal and Small Business Bankruptcy Practice in California, 2003.


Education/Credentials
B.A., J.D.

Awards and Honors
President, 1995-1996-Los Angeles Bankruptcy Forum; Member - Los Angeles County Bar Association Committee on Commercial Law & Bankruptcy, 1988. Law Advisory
Commission-Personal & Small Business Bankruptcy Law of the State Bar of California, 1996-2000

MR. BAYER SAYS: The big banks and credit card companys have been working overtime for many years to undermine the Consitutional right of the American people to be able to claim bankruptcy protection. In 2005 the banking lobby successfully convinced Congress and the President to make the laws and proceedures more complicated, hopeing that it will stymie legitimate people from filing bankruptcy. They succeeded in gaining these complex new legal proceedures by greasing the legislative system with hundreds of millions of dollars in "campaign contributions." The good news for the American people is that while the new laws have made the proceedures needlessly complex to the point where inexperienced people can't help but trip over the maze of new rules and regulations, the process is still doable, especially with a lawyer who is well trained and experienced in this specialty.

Past/Present Clients
I have probably handled something on the order of about 15,000 bankruptcy cases thropughout my career.

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.