Expert: John McInnis - 5/17/2009

Question
Rule 7.11 makes clear that...the players, coaches or any member of an offensive team shall vacate any space (including both dugouts) needed by a fielder who is attempting to field a batted or thrown ball.

Rule 7.09(c) says...before two are out and a runner on 3rd, the batter hinders a fielder in making a play at home base; the runner is out.

What seems crystal clear to me is not so obvious to others; therefore I need help understanding who is correct.  These rules seem to put the onus on the offense to get out of the way. If they do not the penalty is interference.

What is confusing is whether or not this is the intended rule.  Some argue that you have to look at other variables like, did the batter intend to interfere, was he in the box, was he out of the box, etc...

The only reference to intent seems to be in aggravating the penalties (meaning runner out and batter out).  It seems to me that the judgment is the batter either hindered a play at the plate, or he did not hinder the play without regards to intent or location of the hindrance.

What is the ruling.  If there are other rules that apply, please indicate.

Answer
Hi Brant,

Interference:  Offensive interference is an act by a member of the team at bat which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play.

I'm not a umpire but I've seen my share of interference calls over the years.  I always say it's in the eyes of the ump...  If he suspect interference, they'll call it.  It may not seem fair but its there for the protection of the players - especially the younger ones.  

For a detailed answer on this, you should visit a site for umpires and research this interesting question.  Try the Amateur Baseball Umpires Association - Forum:

http://www.umpire.org/forum.php

Best of luck,

JohnMc