Expert: Dana Krempels, Ph.D. - 7/2/2007

Question
Greetings, My name is Larry Thomas and I am an American living in Wiesbaden, Germany. I am currently looking for someone within the religious and the academic community to review several works that I have put together.

The total work itself is a combination of several fields such as, neurology, cosmology, biology, physics, chemistry, engineering, Astronomy, Religion, History, etc… just to name a few in advance. I only ask those who are willing to review this work so that if any are kind enough to offer feedback to some of the theories contained within it then, it would be appreciated.

The written work is posted on a free website which has its annoying adds, so pop-up blockers should be set at max on your web-browser to avoid them. The address of the material is posted at www.ascensionq.20fr.com or it can be Googled under the title “Ascension Q”.

Anyone within the academic community that reviews it need only to read the hyperlinked titles (each are separate pages)  at the bottom of the home page and several linked pages in the menu of the homepage starting with “The Wedding” down to “The Harvest Season” to get a sense of what is involved in the work itself.

Each page has its own hyperlinked words which link to “Wikipedia” and hopefully in the future to the new “Citizendium”. Most information is correct and these links can be used to cross-check what I wrote about that subject when I used that specific word for any explanation or analogy.

The graphics used in most of the diagrams represent actual things and representations in computer model form. Several computer models are present in the site itself which are already in publication in science books today. Each diagram is accompanied by a descriptive paragraph which explains the diagram in more detail other than the story that the diagram presents itself when one studies it in a hieroglyphic way.

Several theories stick out in my mind and they do happen to form an “Image” (keyword) which are laid out on tracks of neurons. The Universe (also a hyperlinked title on the bottom of the homepage) as seen from a distance carries the same “Image” that is presently seen when examining the human neurons in the brain.

A computer model of the Observable Universe shows the galaxies and super-clusters of stars to be strung together in filaments that remarkably favor one another in appearance and design. When placed side by side to one another these patterns look as though they could connect to what is actually the design of the Observable Universe.  

Even though the representations are computer models the actual stained human neurons carry the same “Image”. This would seem to point out a interesting school of thought in regards to “The Big Bang” because it more than likely had a tremendous echo and the effect of it made a universe in the “Image” of neurons and the echo affect trickled down to our brains in a micro and macrocosm way of viewing it.

The Bang itself could be viewed as the birth of an all powerful thought that created the Heavens and the Earth which in turn is a living thought in the mind of God. Our thoughts seem to manifest themselves so in turn the giant filaments looking like neurons in the “Brane” (the mem”branes”in space-time) of the universe manifested itself that being the “Image” of God.

If anyone in the academic or religious community is humble enough to just view the diagrams to see the computer models and to see if there is any truth in the similarities in design are welcome to review them and offer feedback via the contact info posted in the menu on the homepage. All pages are linked to the homepage “Ascension Q” which should be referred to in case one gets lost in the pages.

Thank you for your time and I hope I can hear from any who read this.  

Answer
Dear Larry,

This is a very extensive site, and an interesting idea.  I will try to find the time to have a closer look.  

Your contention that the human nervous system is a reflection of the Big Bang is quite poetic.  However, because it it not really frameable as a testable hypothesis, it cannot be considered as a scientific question, nor subjected to falsification.  Hence, it must remain in the realm of philosophy, and not science.

Not that there's anything wrong with that!  :)

Dana