British History/-

Advertisement


Question
Hi Joseph!

I'd like to ask you what the difference is between a Briton and an Englishman. Which are the Brits and which are Englishmen?

thanks!

Answer
Hello Luke,

As lame as it sounds, the difference between Briton and English(wo)man seems to me to be more stylistic than anything else.  (As an American, I'm aware that I might be stepping on some toes here.)  

Briton, related as it is to Britain/Brittania/Breton, etc., has a more classical feel to it.  From the Oxford English Dictionary:  

"1. A native of Britain:    a. In History and Ethnology: One of the race who occupied the southern part of the island at the Roman invasion, the ‘ancient Britons'.    b. A Welshman.    c. Since the union of England and Scotland: A native of Great Britain, or of the British Empire; much used in the 18th c.; now chiefly in poetic, rhetorical, or melodramatic use, and in phrases dating to the ‘Rule Britannia' period, as ‘to work like a Briton', ‘as tough as a Briton', etc. North Briton: a Scotchman."

Notice definitions A and C.  They are the best indicators of how and when to use the term.  Since the attacks in London on July 7, the use of "Briton" seems to be much more current than those definitions would suggest, however.  

In contrast, the OED defines "Englishman" thus:  

"1. a. A man who is English by descent, birth, or naturalization. The historical senses of course follow those of ENGLISH a.; in mod. use, unless otherwise determined by context (as in Englishman by descent, naturalized Englishman), the word means one born in England or of English parents."

So it appears, as I noted earlier, to be a sytlistic usage dependent upon what one wishes to convey.  I would illustrate the differences based on personal experience.  A friend of mine, born in America, married an Englishman and has become a citizen of the UK.  She has taken to her new country thoroughly, and considers herself to be an Englishwoman.  In contrast, another friend, whose family has been in England since time immemorial, calls himself a Briton.  

I hope that helps you out, Luke.  Kind of a long answer, but that's the English language for you -- full of nuance and shades of meaning.

Best wishes,

Joseph Logue  

British History

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Joseph Logue

Expertise

I am knowledgeable about English history from about 1400 to 1688, and then from the reign of Victoria (after 1837). I have a particular interest in the monarchy and dynastic relations of Europe from 1800 onwards. I cannot answer questions regarding the latter Stuarts, the early Hanovers, and the politics of the 18th century.

Experience

Undergraduate degree in British history.
Lifelong interest, and over 25 years of personal study.
Oxford University: History of the British Monarchy

Education/Credentials
BA/History
MS/Library and Information Science
Awards and Honors
Graduated with distinction from the Program for European Studies (UMass Boston).

Awards and Honors
Graduated with distinction from the Program for European Studies (UMass Boston).

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.