	AllExperts > Experts
	Search

Expert: Alex Wilding
Date: 7/6/2008
Subject: I'd wish to know whether what I wrote is OK or not

Question
QUESTION: Hi,
At a forum of the Discovery Channel's Canadian site, http://community.discoverychannel.ca/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/462105011/m/921108114/p/... (I currently can't access to this forum since several days ago, and I don't know whether I will be able to do it again some day), I wrote something and I'd wish to know if I made some mistakes.
This is what I wrote:

I think Aupak is right, gravity is pretty close to magnetism. Just look at the formula of the gravitational force. If I'm not wrong, James Maxell noticed the similarity between the formulas of elcetric and magnetic forces and he demonstrated with his equations that they were the same force, electromagnetism, so reducing from five to four the fundamental forces of Physics.
By example, the formula of the electrostatic force Fe between two charges q1 and q2 is proportional to these and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them (r^2):
Fe = (1/(4*PI()*e0))*(q1*q2/r^2)
Where (1/(4*PI()*e0)) is constant, with PI()=3.141592654, and e0=8.85*10^12 F/m (Farads per meter) being one of the fundamental constants of Physics named permissiblity in vacuum. With the charges q1 and q2 measured in Coulombs and the distance or radius r measured in meters, you get the force Fe in Newtons (N).
On the other side, the formula of the gravitational force Fg between two masses m1 and m2 is also proportional to these and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r^2) between their masses' centres:
Fg = G*(m1*m2/r^2)
Where G is also constant, other one of the fundamental constants of Physics named gravitational constant, equal to 6.672*10^(-11) m^3/(s^2*kg), in cubic meters over square seconds by kilogram. With the masses m1 and m2 measured in kilograms and the distance or radius r measured in meters, you get the force Fg in Newtons (N = kg*m/s^2).
Personally, I think that Maxwell was right, you can't have two so similar formulas if they aren't related with each other, but, for almost two hundred years, "science" had consistently failed to find (on purpose, I think) the relation what would reduce from four to three the fundamental forces of Physics, being the other two the strong and weak nuclear forces, which act inside of atom's nucleus, so Mankind was unfamiliar with them until modern times.
Of course, to achieve this isn't easy and it would require a genius of the size of Maxwell or bigger.
But, at least once, someone apparently discovered this and used it, so "science" keeps tightly closed its eyes in front of this.
Despite "science", it exists in Florida, USA, a place named "The Coral Castle", an amazing building made of coral stones of several tons in weight, entirely built by only one man, Edward Leedskalnin, a Latvian immigrant weighing 115 lbs (52 kg), with just primary education. This man claimed to know how the Great Pyramids were built, and taking in account what he did, what until I know was never repeated by nobody else, he was probably right.
He apparently used some kind of electromagnetic apparatus or radio waves to overcome gravity making the stones levitate. Although he worked in secret and nobody knows how he did it, two boys witnessed once this levitation and they said that the stone floated "as an helium balloon".
See http://www.crystalinks.com/coralcastle.html, http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/viewcolumn.php?id=26 or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_Castle.
Why should "science" would take pains so much in avoiding to discover the force behind electromagnetism and gravity, o better yet, the only one fundamental force of the unified field?.
Because of power, or money, or power and money, in order to maintain the satus quo, the poverty thus the inequity. I wrote about this. The problems are not solved because they don't want to solve them.
The implications of this would revolutionize things like transport and energy, now dominated by petroleum and nuclear energy.
Magnetism seems to be also closely related with time, besides gravity.
In November or December of 2001 it appeared in the newspapers from all over the world the news that a machine of the time had been invented. I read it in the local newspaper (I maintain the mind open to the possibility that it is true). In a remote forest of the region of Volgogrado, in Russia, in the month of August of 2001, the inventor Vadim Chernobrov had proven a machine of enough size to contain a person, powered with automobile batteries. Proven first with a goat, it could change the time in until 3%, after being operating for until an hour and a half. That implies a maximum desfasaje of almost of 2 minutes 45 seconds. It was a spherical capsule of about two meters in diameter that was isolated of the electro-magnetic-gravitational field of the Earth, and therefore of the terrestrial time, by means of the generation of strong rotational, spherical and concentric magnetic fields, one inside another as the layers of an onion that rotated at great speed, said the article.
Does anybody knows what happen after that?. I mean, what did "science" do about this?. Did anybody continue these experiments?. I guess no. "Science" keeps tightly closed its eyes again. And does anyone remember Chernobrov and his experiment, only seven years ago?.
About the fundamental constants of Physics, there is also a controversy about them.
The gravitational constant is one, but there are several others constants which define our Universe as it is since the very moment of Big Bang. Besides the already mentioned permissiblity in vacuum (electric), there is the speed of light in vacuum, the charge of the electron, the mass of the electron, the permeability in vacuum (magnetic), the constants of Planck, Avogadro, Boltzman, Faraday, Rydberg, etcetera.
The controversy arises because the values of some of them are so precisely adjusted that a minimum change in them wouldn't allow life as we know it, and the changes needed to impede our existence are so tiny that it's not reasonable to think that they are adjusted so precisely only at random. The probablities against this are so huge that is an statistic impossibility.
For example, if during the creation of the Universe, in the called Big Bang, the proportion matter - antimatter had differed in an infinitesimal quantity (one in thousand billions or 10^-15 or the fifteenth decimal place, if I'm not wrong), it would have been formed either too much matter, and the Universe would have collapsed immediately because the action of the gravity, or too little matter, and it had expanded and cooled so quickly that the galaxies and the stars would not have been able to be formed.
More extreme than this, the recently measured cosmologic constant, related with what is named Dark Energy, which opposes to gravity, needs to be adjusted to the 120th decimal place, or we wouldn't exist.
Nobody believed this is so just by accident. But none "scientist" wished to admit the existence of a Creator or God or or Great Spirit or Holy Ghost or Higher Intelligence or Superior Being who adjusted these paramters to allow our existence, so they devoloped the idea of Multiverse, that is that our's one is just one of infinite other parallel universes that we can't detect. But this led them back again to the idea of a Creator: Between infinite universes, with infinite combinations of rules (laws) and constants of Physics, there would be many more primitive universes which wouldn't allow the development of life and intelligence, but also there would be many more advanced universes which would allow the development of a Higher Intelligence or Superior Being, what has been named a Super-Intelligence.
There aren't reasons to think that the evolution of intelligence can't continue in our Universe, and we are now using computing technology able to simulate highly detailed virtual worlds. Just try to imagine what the evolution of this could do in a far future. And it isn't unreasonable to think that, if more advanced universes exist with more advanced civilizations of Superior Beings with more advanced computing technology, they are doing these complex simulations right now. They could simulate an entire universe. Our very Universe could be one of these simulations. All we could exist as as a simulation in a virtual reality machine, a super mind or Super-Intelligence.
This is being discussing right now when talking about the nature of Reality.
If I'm not wrong, the Greek philosopher Plato said 2500 years ago that everything what exists in our material world existed before in an energetic or spiritual world, a perfect world of thoughts. Every material thing existed before being created or manifested as a thought or idea, Plato said. The existence of a thought or idea implies the existence of a mind (perhaps that Super-Intelligence?).
Sometimes opposed to Darwin's Evolution, it exist also a scientific theory named Intelligent Design.
The idea that the Universe was created on purpose to allow our existence is named Antropic Principle, in science.
I almost can see Aupak smiling. As I stated before somewhere, True Science is about discovering Truth, while True Religion is about a revealed Truth, but truth is truth, the same truth, so they must coincide in some points, or they wouldn't be True things. Truth matters.
There is an excellent documetary of the series Horizon, from the British BBC, an episode named "Parallel Universes" (2002), touching the subject of the Multiverse.
Michel Duff had been working in a theory named "Super Gravity", describing an Universe with eleven dimensions. For about ten years, his theory was displaced by the "Theory of strings", which postulated an Universe with ten dimensions. But this last one collapsed, giving five versions, so their defenders added what they have been discarded for a decade, the eleventh dimension, with which the strings joined all together in a membrane. All our Universe is a Membrane. This gave the named Theory of Membrane or Theory M. Some people say that M could mean other things, besides Membrane, such as Magic, Mistery, Matrix, Mother, Majestic, etcetera. I think David Icke would call it the Oneness. This surrealistic eleventh dimension, where all the "normal" laws of common sense have been abandoned, is infinitely large and wide, but very thin, only a trillionth of millimeter or about 10^-20 mm thick maximum, and inside it there are infinite membranes or "branes" or parallel universes. Lisa Randall was fascinated with the weakness of gravity. The magnetic force of a tiny magnet can pick up a paper clip defeating the gravitational attraction of the entire planet over it (its weight). Randall concluded that in the eleventh dimension the gravity is so strong as all the other three fundamental forces, but his force is distributed between all the dimensions of all the membranes or parallel universes. Each membrane or universe has its own laws of Physics. By example, in some of them the proton would be unstable, and without stable matter the DNA would dissolve and there wouldn't be life in them, at least not life as we know it, may be some kind of energetic life. Some others could be very similar to our one, but with a different history, perhaps one where Napoleon won Waterloo, one where Al Gore is President, one where Elvis is alive, or where we have never born. There would be infinite civilizations in them. With the parallel universes, the Theory M did something that no one other theory did before, it explained the very moment of Big Bang, the time zero, what has been called the Singularity, where the Relativity's equations collapse. In 2001 Burt Ovrut suggested that there are huge waves in these membranes and some times these waves collide. When Neil Turok, Paul Steinhardt and his colleagues heard Ovrut's idea in a conference at Cambridge, they let their imagination to fly and developed the theory that the Big Bang was the result of the collision of two membranes or two parallel universes. When branes come close together there are waves on the surface or each one, and when they touch each other they do it at the crests of the waves, and when this happen, the matter is created there. The waves caused the groups of matter after the Big Bang. The existence of branes before the Singularity implies the existence of time before the Big Bang. The new theory crosses the Singularity, so this vanished. The Big Bangs probably occur all the time. Our universe coexist with other membranes, which are also in process of expansion. Alan Guth says that by studying the atoms we can see that reality is much stranger than science-fiction. The particles can be in some sense in more of one place at the same time. The only explanation what somebody could imagine is that the particles don't exist only in our universe, but also in other parallel universes, all them slightly different. Guth have been theorizing about the possibility of creating a new universe in a laboratory. This new universe wouldn't displace the mother surrounding universe, although it would grow very fast, creating its own space when growing, and in a very short fraction of second, it would wholy separate itself of our universe to evolve as an isolated universe which grows in cosmic proportions, without displacing nothing of the territory where we currently are.
The idea that waves of "branes" collide all the time creating matter here in the third dimension, and that gravity filters from the eleventh dimension to lower dimensions, remembers me other things.
In theory, in the tenth dimension, "branes", when vibrating, manifest themselves as strings, and in lower dimensions as particles, waves, forces, etc. I think that what we see are the effects of the vibrations or waves in this one and the other dimensions.
When I first heard of Worm Holes, they said that, in vacuum, for a instant, energy condenses itself in particles of matter and anti-matter, which exist very briefly and they self-destroy by joining together back to energy, and that this process could make very tiny and ephemeral Worm Holes. There is an experiment to demonstrate this, by placing large mirrors one in front of other with vacuum in between them. The gravitational force, attracting one mirror to the other, exerted by these ephemeral couples of particles of matter and anti-matter can be measured in laboratory. I think this force could account for the phenomenon what is named Dark Matter.
Now a little of speculation.
Let's suppose that going away from the surface of the membrane of our Universe in the eleventh dimension there are ten layers, or "planes", and these layers are the lower dimensions. The closer layer is the 10th dimension, the second layer is the 9th dimension, the third layer is the 8th dimension, and so on.
Let's call to these layers or planes the Physical Dimensions.
And let's suppose that a wave in the brane has enough amplitude to cross several of these layers, so we can detect its crest here in the third dimension by the matter what it creates, as in the Worm Hole experiment. I think this could be what Lisa Randall says in the mentioned documentary when she says "we only see the final end of gravity", when talking about gravity's weakness in this dimension.
Now, let's imagine that to the other side of the membrane of our Universe there are another ten layers, another ten dimensions or planes. Let's call to these layers the Spiritual Dimensions.
Therefore, next to the brane, on this side, is the 10th dimension (physical) and also next to the brane, but on the other side of it, is the 10th dimension (spiritual), and the same is true for the other dimensions: each physical dimension on this side of the membrane has its correspondent spiritual dimension on the other side.
Let's suppose that these ephemeral particles in the Worm Hole experiment oscillate as a pendulum from this physical third dimension to the the spiritual third dimension. First they exist or manifest themselves here in the physical 3rd, then they disappear from this dimension, starting the half cycle, crossing all the higher physical dimensions up to the 11th one (the medium point or equilibrium point of the oscillation), then crossing all the higher spiritual dimensions down to the spiritual third dimension, where they reappear or manifest themselves again, finishing the half cycle. Then they disappear from there starting the other half of the cycle, crossing all the higher dimensions, first the spiritual ones, then the 11th, then the physical ones, and finishing the cycle here, when they reappear.
Now let's suppose that we, and all what exist, aren't different to these particles. We exist for a while, someone more, someone less, then we disappear, we go to some spiritual world, and then we come back here when we reincarnate.
Now please excuse me, but I will come back to David Icke (I know, I know, but he could be on something).
When he wrote "I am me. I am free", in 1996, "science" was still talking about ten dimension, so he puts the Oneness in the 10th dimension. I just move it to the 11th one.
I believe that when we die we go by the Oneness, the light at the end of the tunnel, like Icke says in the Chap. 8, p. 143, mentioning stories people from who went by Near to Death Experiences. But I believe that we go twice by that point, one when going, when we go to the Spiritual Realms of the Consciousness, as Icke calls them, and another when turning back, when, coming from these Realms, we reincarnate in a new life in this physical world. It is like an oscillation, a sway movement like that of a pendulum, in which the Oneness would be the half point, the balance point. It is as if when dying our consciousness moves in the time and in the space until the moment and exact place of the Big Bang, that is to say the Oneness, and it crossed it at full speed, with the push, to go to live a spiritual life on the other side, which, as it's explained in the Tibetan Book of the Deads, is divided in three stages called "Bards", in a spiritual plane that is symmetrical to this physical plane regarding the Oneness. At the end of that spiritual life it cross it again in their return trip until this physical plane. In the Figure 5, in the p. 104, is illustrated the whirl, or vortex, or pyramid, or cone, of the virtual reality descending from the Oneness, with its different planes or horizontal levels, or dimensions, each one denser than the superior. But these are only the levels, or planes, or dimensions, of the dense physical world. In the Figure 7, in the p. 144, you can see the spiritual realms of the conscience located over the Oneness, like he explains in the Chap. 8, p. 143, where the dimensions of time / space are described as having the form of an hour-glass, with their spiritual levels up and the physic ones below, connected by the tunnel, the vibrational neutral point, the Oneness. Instead of that, I imagine those dimensions like two diametrically opposed cones united by the vertex, that is to say the Oneness. This is like the geometric body that would be formed by rotating a form of X around a vertical axis that goes by their center, the intersection of both arms of the X, the Oneness. This would form two cones, one descending from the Oneness, in the inferior part, representing at the dense physical levels, and another over it, inverted, ascending from the Oneness, symmetrical to the previous one regarding the Oneness, as their image in the mirror. And each one of these vertical cones united by the vertex (the Oneness) has different horizontal levels or dimensions. Then, descending from the Oneness, we have, among the physical dimensions, the Physical Ninth, the Physical Eighth, the Physical Seventh, and so on, each one denser, or vibrating to a slower frequency, that the previous one. And on the other side, symmetrically, ascending from the Oneness, we have the spiritual dimensions, the Spiritual Ninth, the Spiritual Eighth, the Spiritual Seventh, and so on. It is as supplementing the descending cone of the Figure 5, in the p. 104, the physical dimensions, with a symmetrical cone that expands up from the Oneness, the spiritual dimensions. Then, to pass from this Third Physical Dimension toward the Third Spiritual Dimension, at the moment of the death, it is necessary to go by the tunnel, the Oneness, in the going trip. The same thing in the return trip from the Third Spiritual Dimension toward this Third Physical Dimension, when reincarnating. As Icke explains in the Chap. 6, p. 103-105, the spiritual evolution is a continuous ascent toward the Oneness, by passing from a lower, or more distant from the Oneness, or denser dimension vibrating to a slower frequency, to the following one higher, or nearer to the Oneness, subtler dimension vibrating to a quicker frequency, and so on until arriving to the Oneness, the Prodigal Son returns home to “the Father”. On the other hand, I imagine it as a sway, the movement of a pendulum, a pendulous movement carried out by our conscience by passing from a physical dimension to a spiritual one and vice versa in each cycle of death and reincarnation, in more and more short oscillations, among dimensions, both physical and spiritual, higher and higher, or nearer and nearer to the Oneness, until stopping in this last one that is the balance point, the neutral point, the center of the oscillations. Perhaps it remains in that state some thousands of millions of years until there is a new Big Bang and everything begins another time. Look at the figure 4 on page 102, chapter 6, depicting the "Bottle Vortex". You can see a spiral stairs ascending to the Oneness. What I'm saying is something like this: let's suppose that on the right and left sides of the stairs in the figure, there are landings. The right landings would be the physical dimensions and the left landings would be spiritual dimensions. The difference is that I'm saying that in each turn of the spiral, when passing from a right landing or physical dimension to the corresponding next left landing or spiritual dimension, and vice versa, our consciousness crosses the Oneness, in the figure the vertical axis of the spiral stairs. In the p. 144, of the Chap. 8, Icke says that the death doesn't lead automatically to the illumination, that is not a cure for the ignorance. However it is an opportunity to achieve a bigger illumination, according to the brief and very old Tibetan Book of the Deads, translated by Timothy Leary, whose reading I recommend, which coincides in several points with what Icke teaches. That is achieved, in my opinion if in the two opportunities in that we go by the light, the Oneness, in the movement of sway of our conscience, we try to remain in the state in that it is, to syntonize us with it, to attach ourselves to it, to stick ourselves to it, so that our pendulous movement is braked a little and in this way, we don't go so far from the Oneness into the spiritual dimensions when leaving it, so we arrive down to a higher dimension, nearer to the Oneness than that to which we would arrive if the movement had not been braked a little. The Tibetan Book of the Deads doesn't call it the Oneness, but rather it speaks of a luminous emptiness, empty of everything except of peace, love and happiness. Empty of all shape, color, shade, reference point, texture, odor, flavor, sound, sensation, feeling (except of peace, love and happiness), thought or action. Limitless and atemporal. A state of absolute rest. Frequently the meditation tries to reach a mental state near to that. The Tibetan Book of the Deads recommends not to attach nor to reject nothing in our trip (sway) except to that emptiness of light and happiness that ""is principle and final itself", the alpha and the omega. That of not attaching to nothing except to it reminds me the First Commandment, "thou shall love God over all the things". The Tibetan Book of the Deads describes it this way: "Your own conscience, shining, empty and inseparable. No-thought, no-vision, no-color, is empty. The intellect shining and full with happiness and silent. This is the state of perfect illumination. Your own conscience, shining, empty and inseparable of the great radiant body, doesn't have birth, neither death. It is the unalterable light that the Tibetans call Buddha Amitabha. The knowledge in the no-form beginning". I Also interpret that it passes by there twice, one when going, at the beginning of the sway, and another when returning, at the end.
There is something similar in the Bible, in John's First Letter, Chapter 2, about fulfilling the commandment of love, verses 15 to 17: "Don't love to the world neither what there is in the world".
In the Chapter 8, page 146, Icke says: "We will never release our psyche from its dense physical prison until we release ourselves from our emotional prison. The two are actually the same thing."
I believe that with each Big Bang the Oneness tries to get rid of all that is not similar to it, expelling it toward the cold and dark space emptiness, the Darkness.
If I'm not wrong, the Buddhists say that where you go when you die depends on your last thought. You should address your last thought to God (or to the Oneness, I think), because if you think in something of this world then you are attached to it, and you will return (after the sway) to this world of self-inflicted (by ignorance) suffering, you won't be able to release yourself of the wheel of reincarnations.
The parabola of the pendulum is good in other sense, also.
According the Tibetan Book of Deads, the first stage of the spiritual life (to the other side of the membrane, I think), or the first Bard, is that of the Pleasant Deities. It as these deities are trying to attract you away from the Buddha Amitabha (the 11th dimension, the Oneness) toward lower spiritual dimensions, in the first phase of the sway, immediately after you crossed the Oneness. This Book says that if you allow yourself to be dragged by this pull, then you'll reincarnate in a kind of animal state (I think the amplitude of the sway is increased and you'll reincarnate in a lower physical dimension). After you reached the maximum separation from the Oneness, when the pendulous movement stops and change its direction toward the Oneness, begins the second stage or Bard, that of the Terrible Deities. They would be trying to scare you back toward the Oneness, to accelerate your trip toward it, so you cross it with more push in order to make you reach a lower physical dimension, farther from the Oneness, after you cross it. It's as when a father pushes his child in a swing, a kind of pendulum what we are familiar with.
The sway is God's breath. The move from here to the Oneness is the inhalation (or Female Energy in figure 5 of Icke's book, page 104) and the move from the Oneness to here is the exhalation (or Male Energy in figure 5 of Icke's book). When we are on the other side we would be inside God as when air is inside our lungs.
You should not feel attachment nor rejection for nothing when you are on the other side, says this Book. There, everything is illusion, hallucinations, product of our mind, a solipsism. There is nothing there, we are alone, it's only our mind, and perhaps God's mind. It's said that Tim Leary, the LSD pioneer, re-translated the book because he discovered in it words describing something similar to what he experienced with the drug. I think this makes sense, because the acid stops the brain functioning, at the level of the sinapsis, so it's almost as it was dead, so, disconnected from the outer world or reality, you can see what is inside your mind. Some versions says that there is also a judgement of our good and bad actions in our life, as in the Christian tradition and in the Egyptian Mythology (the Egyptian Book of Deads), but this judgement is also an illusion, and you can learn a lot of it but you shouldn't give him too much importance.
And everything here, on this side of the membrane, in the physical dimensions, would be also illusion, but a collective illusion, a collective solipsism, a collaborative construction of all our minds, the earth's mind, the sun's mind, etcetera. The only truth would be the Oneness, the absolute neutrality, the 11th dimension.
On one hand, when we are on the other side we aren't dead, we are living a spiritual life, in a world or dreams and illusions, not so different to that where we go when dreaming, so there is no death.
On the other hand, if we say that on the other side we are dead because we can't interact with other minds, or the material world resulting of the thoughts of other minds, then we can say that the Oneness is the infinite and eternal neutrality between life and death. The Oneness existed before life and it will exist after death. It hasn't beginning nor end, it merely exists. It exist out of time, it hasn't time, there is no time in it. It existed before the Big Bang, before time, and it will exist after our universe's death.
Infinite parallel universes or membranes would exist in the 11th dimension, as if the Super-Intelligence or God's mind was simultaneously simulating every single possibility. There could be an universe for each possible quantum state of each electron. There could be an universe to figure out how would be our world if Napoleon won Waterloo or Hitler won the war. And we'd choose to be in one or in other by tuning our mind to it as when tuning a station with a radio receiver. And by doing this we would give our energy, the energy of our beliefs, thoughts and emotions, to the universe what we chose, so making it a little denser, more solid, more real, making the vibrating virtual particles to stay a little more time in this universe, so exerting a little more gravity. As a solipsism.
We not only choose our future, but also our past, and our present. We can't be sure whether the yesterday news are true or not, so how can we be sure about something what happened 2.000 years ago?. We choose to believe some thing or the other and we live in a world that is the sum of all our collective choices.
I can imagine a far time when the "computer" simulating our universe will be "reseted", so everything what wasn't "saved to disk" will be "deleted".
I saw in a documentary a contactee, you know, a person who has contact with ET's or aliens, who have talked with them. This man is from Costa Rica, I can remember his name, but he's rather famous there and inside the ufologist community. He was told that, at the end of each cycle of unimaginable length of time, twenty one (21) of the thirty (30) planes of existence will be destroyed. If I sum the 11th dimension of our membrane or universe, more its ten physical dimensions on this side, more its ten spiritual dimensions on the other side, this gives me the twenty one (21) planes which would be destroyed if our membrane or universe was destroyed.
I'm talking about the destruction of the membranes or parallel universes in the 11th dimension or Oneness, not about the destruction of this last one itself.
I just can't figure out which would be the remaining nine (9) planes.
Therefore, we, or our consciousness, have a time limit or a very wide opportunity window to evolve beyond these twenty one planes before they be destroyed.
This remembers me the myth of Hercules, the Greek hero. In order to survive, he defeated his father Kronos (Saturn for the Romans), the time, who devoured their children. Everything what time creates, it destroys it. To be immortal, you should come out outside of the time.

ANSWER: Dear Roberto,
These speculations are entirely outside my expertise.
All the best
Alex W

---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------

QUESTION: The part where I relate the Tibetan Book of Deads with the new theories in Physics is outside your expertise?.
Did you bothered in reading it all (20 minutes)?

Answer
Dear Roberto,
You ask:
> The part where I relate the Tibetan Book of
> Deads with the new theories in Physics is
> outside your expertise?.
Yes. Timothy Leary's writing on the Tibetan Book of the Dead is not to be taken seriously - the material you quote is a gross misrepresentation. (The "bards", by the way, are not "bards" but "bardos".)
The "physics" you mention is not physics as physicists know it, but speculation using words borrowed from physics.

> Did you bothered in reading it all (20 minutes)?
No. A small sample was enough to tell me that I could not relate to it.
All the best
Alex Wilding

Add to this Answer Ask a Question

About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.

Buddhists

Topic: Buddhists