You are here:

Calculus/limits - the delta-epsilon proofs.(corrected)

Advertisement


Question
the definition of limit is
a function f is said to tend to a limit,l,as x tends to c,if to any positive number e arbitrarily assigned there corresponds a positive number d, such that for every x in (c-d,c+d)-{c},f(x) differs from l numerically by a number less than  e
modulus of f(x)-l < e
for every value of x , such that
0 < modulus x-c <d

i didnot understand this definition could u quote some example putting some  values

Answer
Questioner:   jino
Category:  Calculus
 
Subject:  limits
Question:  the definition of limit is
a function f is said to tend to a limit,l,as x tends to c,if to any positive number e arbitrarily assigned there corresponds a positive number d, such that for every x in (c-d,c+d)-{c},f(x) differs from l numerically by a number less than  e
modulus of f(x)-l < e
for every value of x , such that
0 < modulus x-c <d

i did not understand this definition could u quote some example putting some  values
===========================================
Hi, Jino,

Symbolically, we write:

lim  f(x) = L
x->a

if WHENEVER  x is close to a,  f(x) is close to L.  

Analytically, we define those terms to mean that we shall play the 'epsilon-delta' game.  

f(x) can be made as close as we like to  L,  JUST by making  x close enough to a.

What does 'as close as we like' mean?  We can specify a (small) number epsilon, (which I can't make and will have to write as 'e') and then we should be able to compute, from this epsilon, a (small) number delta, [which I can't make and will be 'd'].

In playing the game, the first person picks the epsilon.  It is up to the second person to compute the proper delta.  Let's play the game for:

f(x) = 3x + 5,  and  lim(x->2), which we think will be  11.  [I leave it to you to see how we guessed the 11.]

First guy picks  e = 0.00001.  That's real small, right?

Second guy says:

I need: | f(x) - 11 |  < 0.00001

So I'll do some algebra.

| 3x + 5 - 11 |  < 0.00001

| 3x - 6 |  < 0.00001  

2 | x - 2 | < 0.00001

 | x - 2 | < 0.000005

Aha!  That's it.  If I use that  0.000005 as my delta, I can 'climb' back up the ladder and win the game.  I will just say that if:

 | x - 2 | < 0.000005
then
2 | x - 2 | < 0.00001
and
| 3x - 6 |  < 0.00001  
and
| 3x + 5 - 11 |  < 0.00001  
which is
| f(x) - 11 |  < 0.00001  
and the  11  was my L and the 0.00001  was the epsilon.

Now how can we be sure this will always work?  0.00001 might seem small, but maybe someone thinks it's big?  Just do it symbolically:

First guy picks  e,  and we don't care how small it is. We want  

| 3x + 5 - 11 |  < e

| 3x - 6 |  < e  

3 | x - 2 | < e      <<< correction

 | x - 2 | < e/3         <<< correction

So that's the answer.  Whatever the first guy picks as e, we pick d = e/3, and climb the ladder.
.......................................
OK, is that all there is to it?  No, unfortunately some examples are harder, but I'll leave those to your teacher.

Calculus

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Paul Klarreich

Expertise

All topics in first-year calculus including infinite series, max-min and related rate problems. Also trigonometry and complex numbers, theory of equations, exponential and logarithmic functions. I can also try (but not guarantee) to answer questions on Analysis -- sequences, limits, continuity.

Experience

I taught all mathematics subjects from elementary algebra to differential equations at a two-year college in New York City for 25 years.

Education/Credentials
(See above.)

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.