You are here:

Cameras/Kodak # 2 Box Camera

Advertisement


Question
I have a Kodak #2 box camera, NOT a brownie, but the 2nd model ever made by Kodak in the late 1800's. It has never been used and it is still "wrapped" with a string through all the mechanisms. I suppose you needed to cut the string before it was to be used. My wife used to work for Kodak and got this from "someone" when she left. All I can find on the web is info about the brownie models, which appear to have been mass produced and not worth too much these days due to their abundance. I did find this exact camera on the site, boxcameras.com and would love to know its approx. value.  Thank You!

Answer


Hello Mark,

The No. 2 Kodak Camera was actually the third model made by the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company (later the Eastman Kodak Company).  The Kodak Camera of 1888 was first (what we today call the "original" Kodak), then a much improved model  called the No. 1 Kodak replaced it early in 1889, and then the larger No. 2 Kodak was introduced in October of 1889.  In that first series of Kodak cameras, there would also be a No. 3, No. 3 Junior, No. 4, and No. 4 Junior.  The No. 2 was by far the most common model, as it stayed in production until 1897!  It made sixty round 3 1/2 inch diameter exposures on a roll of film.  The fact that yours is "wrapped" with string does not indicate it was never used.  It only indicates it has come back from the factory.  When the user finished a roll of film, the entire camera could be shipped to Eastman with the appropriate fees, where the film was removed, the pictures processed, the camera reloaded, and everything returned.  It was standard procedure for the cameras to be completely strung up for security every time they were reloaded at the factory.  So, I have no doubt the camera may be in very fine condition, but it may have had 100+ rolls of film through it!  Makes no difference...from a collectible point of view it's all about condition, and if you believe it looks that new, than it's a dandy one indeed.  Despite being relatively common items, truly excellent examples still bring about $500 today.  If it's REALLY excellent, especially strung up by the factory, you're looking at 50% more, so certainly around $750.  I would like very much to see a picture of it.  My organization has been trying to acquire a decent "wrapped" Kodak camera for several years, and they're hard to find.  People can never resist the temptation to take the string off!  So please send a JPEG image to me at <silver@well.com> where I can take a look at it.  Please be careful.  It's a genuine antique and much more fragile than you might think.  It really should be placed in a proper collection somewhere, but that's for you to decide.  I look forward to seeing it!

Best wishes,

David Silver  

Cameras

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


David Silver

Expertise

I'm an expert on all types of antique, classic, and contemporary cameras, as well as the general history of photography. Everything from ancient box cameras to modern single-lens-reflex; from simple Kodaks to sophisticated Leica and Nikon; from glass plates and roll film to movie and 35mm. I can identify and appraise them, explain how they work, and offer insights on their restoration and care. I can also provide historical background on vintage cameras and equipment, and guidelines on their purchase and sale.

Experience

I've been a professional photographer and a student of the history of photography for nearly 30 years. During that time my collection of vintage cameras and photographic paraphernalia has grown beyond 2000 significant pieces. I've published nearly 70 articles in the field, including 16 in the popular "Buying Classic Cameras" series for PHOTO SHOPPER MAGAZINE from 1995 to 1997, I'm currently a contributing editor for CAMERA SHOPPER MAGAZINE and McKEOWN'S PRICE GUIDE TO ANTIQUE AND CLASSIC CAMERAS, and I've written numerous entries for WORLD BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA. Portions of my collection have been displayed in museums and special exhibits in the past two decades, and many of the items were photographed as illustrations for books. In 1985 I founded the International Photographic Historical Organization (InPHO), which eventually evolved into its intended purpose as the best first resource for information on the history of photography. I'm also a founding member of several e-mail forums dedicated to specialized areas of photography, and I'm the moderator of the Internet Directory of Camera Collectors (IDCC), which remains the largest and most successful such group in the world. For more information about the International Photographic Historical Organization and its many services, please visit its web pages at:

http://www.photographyhistory.com


©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.