You are here:

Careers: Business/Managerial Economics


Dear Sir request you to give the answer for the below qestions

Q-1) Explain the nature and significance of ‘Managerial Economics’. How is it
related to Macro Economics?
What is ‘Demand Forecasting’? What are its objective and types?

Q-2) Explain fully the concept of ‘Price Elasticity of Demand’.

Q-3) Explain the terms T.C., A.C. and M.C. with examples. Why does the long run
A.C. curve is saucer shaped?

Q-4) Give the classification of market on the basis of degree of competition.
Q-5) What is ‘Cost Benefit Analysis’? Describe the steps involved in it and its
Q-6) a) How does Government control monopoly?

b) What are the advantage and disadvantages of Economic Liberalization?

Q-7) Write notes on any Two:
a) Dynamic Theory of Profit.
b) Private Vs. Public Goods.
c)  Exceptions to the ‘Law of Supply’.
d)  Difficulties in the National Income Estimate.


I  will send  the balance  asap.

I  will send  the balance  asap.
Q-1) Explain the nature and significance of ‘Managerial Economics’. How is it
related to Macro Economics?

The social science that deals with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services and with the theory and management of economies or economic systems.
The  foundations of TRADITIONAL  economics and all the social sciences
has multiple fundamental flaws  which  includes  an intrinsic inconsistency in utility theory.
In game theory undefined sums are used to define basic concepts, the characteristic function is ill-defined, and there are other fundamental errors.
In measurement theory the models of even the most elementary variables such as length and mass are incorrect, and  in decision theory even what is being measured is not understood.
These  errors  must  be  removed explained and their correction outlined.
Correcting these theories will lead to better decisions by individuals, organizations,  affecting everyday lives of people throughout the world.

NEEDS  Steps of Structured Decision Making:
• Problem definition. What specific decision has to be made? What are the spatial and  temporal scope of the decision? Will the decision be iterated over time?
• Objectives. What are the management objectives? Ideally, these are stated in
quantitative terms that relate to metrics that can be measured. Setting objectives falls in the realm of policy, an d should be informed by legal and regulatory mandates, as well as  stakeholder viewpoints. A number of methods for stakeholder elicitation and conflict  resolution are appropriate for clarifying objectives.
• Alternatives. What are the different management actions to choose from? This element  requires explicit articulation of the alternatives available to the decision maker. The  range of permissible options is often constrained by legal or political considerations, but  structured assessment may lead to creative new alternatives.
• Consequences. What are the consequences of different management actions? How much  of the objectives would each alternative achieve? In structured decision-making, we  predict the consequences of the alternative actions with some type of model Depending  on the information available or the quantification desired for a structured decision process  consequences may be modeled with highly scientific computer applications or with personal judgment elicited carefully and transparently. Ideally, models are quantitative,
but they need not be; the important thing is that they link actions to consequences.
• Tradeoffs. If there are multiple objectives, how do they trade off with each other? In  most complex decisions, the best we can do is choose intelligently between less-than- perfect alternatives. Numerous tools are available to help determine the relative  importance or weights among conflicting objectives and to then compare alternatives  across multiple attributes to find the ‘best’ compromise solutions.
• Uncertainty. Because we rarely know precisely how management actions will affect  natural systems, decisions are frequently made in the face of uncertainty. Uncertainty  makes choosing among alternative far more difficult. A good decision-making process  will confront uncertainty explicitly, and evaluate the likelihood of different outcomes and  their possible consequences.
• Risk Tolerance. Identifying the uncertainty that impedes decision-making, then
analyzing the risk that uncertainty presents to management is an important step in making  a good decision. Understanding the level of risk a decision-maker is willing to accept, or  the risk response determined by law or policy, will make the decision-making process  more objectives-driven, transparent, and defensible.
• Linked decisions. Many important decisions are linked over time. The key to dealing  effectively with linked decisions is to isolate and resolve the near-term issues while  sequencing the collection of information needed for future decisions



Managerial economics (also called business economics), is a branch of economics that applies microeconomic analysis to specific business decisions. As such, it bridges economic theory and economics in practice. It draws heavily from quantitative techniques such as regression analysis and correlation, Lagrangian calculus (linear). If there is a unifying theme that runs through most of managerial economics it is the attempt to optimize business decisions given the firm's objectives and given constraints imposed by scarcity, for example through the use of operations research and programming.

“Managerial economics is .. the application of economic principles and methodologies to the decision-making process within the firm or organization.”
“Managerial economics applies economic theory and methods to business and administrative decision-making.”
“Managerial economics refers to the application of economic theory and the tools of analysis of decision science to examine how an organisation can achieve its objectives most effectively.”

“It is the application of economic analysis to business problems; it has its origin in theoretical microeconomics.”

•   The steps:the hypothetical-deductive approach
•   make assumptions about behaviour
•   work out the consequences of those assumptions
•   make predictions
•   test the predictions against the evidence
•   PREDICTIONS SUPPORTED? The model is accepted as a good explanation (for the moment)
•   PREDICTIONS REFUTED? Go back and re-work the whole process

Should Assumptions be Realistic?
The assumption of profit-maximising may be unrealistic or inaccurate
However, what matters is the explanatory or predictive power of a theory (or model), not the descriptive realism of its assumptions.
A model built on unrealistic assumptions may give good predictions.
Assumptions are a necessary simplifying device
Example: Overtaking

What Is A “Good” Model?
•   It allows us to make predictions and set hypotheses
•   The predictions can be tested against the empirical evidence
•   The predictions are supported by the empirical evidence

•   Economics in general takes a ‘positive’ and predictive approach not prescriptive or ‘normative’
•   trying to explain “what is” not what “should be”
•   the main objective is to understand how a market economy works
•   Not very concerned about the descriptive realism of assumptions: “I assume X” does not mean “I believe X to be true”
•   Some real tension if the models are used for prescription
•   assume “perfect knowledge”: OK for model-building
•   cannot say to a manager: “behave AS IF you had perfect knowledge”

•   Comparative Statics
•   begin with an initial equilibrium position - the starting point
•   change something
•   identify the new equilibrium, e.g:in neo-classical model of the firm
•   When demand increases?
•   When costs rise?
•   When a fixed cost increases?
•   This is the main purpose of the model -what it was designed to do
•   Normative prescriptions
•   it will cost me $30 per unit to supply something which will give me $20 per unit in revenue- should I do it?
•   I must pay $20 billion to set up in my industry. Should I charge higher prices to get that money back?
•   Positive and Normative are linked by “if?” IF the aim of the firm is to maximise profit what will it do/what should it do?
•   What is the purpose of   MANAGEERIAL  economic analysis?
  Why do we want to apply MANAGERIAL economic analysis to business problems?
  For the businessperson: “to assist decision-making”, to provide decision-rules which can be applied The “normative” approach to theory: What should be?
  These purposes are different, they can lead to misunderstanding, and economists are not always honest about the limitations of their approach for practical purposes.
  What are these limitations?
  If the aim is prediction, unrealistic assumptions are acceptable and may be needed;
  for instance, the firm may be assumed to behave “as if” its managers had perfect knowledge of its environment
  If the aim is to produce decision-rules which can be applied by practising managers, unrealistic assumptions will produce decision-rules which are not operational
  for instance, set output and price by MC=MR
  How Can Managerial Economics Assist Decision-Making?
  1. Adopt a general perspective, not a sample of one
  2. Simple models provide stepping stone to more complexity and realism
  3. Thinking logically has value itself and can expose sloppy thinking

  Why Managerial Economics?
•   A powerful “analytical engine”.
•   A broader perspective on the firm.
•   what is a firm?
•   what are the firm’s overall objectives?
•   what pressures drive the firm towards profit and away from profit
•   The basis for some of the more rigourous analysis of issues in Marketing and Strategic Management.

•   The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm:
  Basic Conditions: factors which shape the market of the industry, e.g. demand, supply, political factors
  Structure: attributes which give definition to the supply-side of the market, e.g. economies of scale, barriers to entry, industry concentration, product differentiation, vertical integration.
  Conduct: the behavior of firms in the market, e.g. pricing behavior advertising, innovation.
  Performance: a judgement about the results of market behaviour, e.g. efficiency, profitability, fairness/income distribution, economic growth.
.   “A close relationship between management and managerial economics  exists’’.



FUNCTIONALLY,    provides  

-opportunity   to  determine  the  environmental  impact  on the
organization /  business.

-opportunity  to   assess  the  organization's  strengths/ weaknesses.

-opportunity  to  determine  the  business opportunities/ threats
to  business.

-opportunity  to  develop   strategic  plans for the  company.

-opportunity  to  develop  long term/short  term  plans.

-opportunity  to  develop  a   vision  for  the  organization.

-opportunity  to  develop  a  mission  statement  for  the  organization.

-opportunity  to  develop    business  objectives for the  organization.

-opportunity  to  develop  business  strategies  for the  organization.

-opportunity  to  develop   the  action/ implementation planning
guidelines, which  provides  the  platform  for  

*helps  to   set  up and develop  organization  and  staffing.

*helps  to set  direction  for  the  organization  approach.

*helps  to  select  the  right  leadership  

*helps  to  select /  set  the  most  appropriate control.
without  this  seed,

-you  cannot  organize  your  business

-without  business  organization , you   cannot   direct

-without  direction, you  cannot  control.

-without  control , you  cannot  get results.

For  success/ results in  business,  you  need  STRATEGIC  PLANNING.

The process of strategic  planning has become essential for the BUSINESS organization interested in obtaining significant results. It matters little whether the organization is large or small or whether it is in the private sector or government service. When an organization has the need to move into the future with a high degree of confidence in what that future holds, it needs strategic  planning. The integrated approach of deciding on a set of long-range goals and then developing the objectives and plans to reach them is the most reliable tool that the organization can use to define its own future and ensure success. In other words, it is the surest way that the management team can become  "system makers"––people who are willing to take the time to make things happen instead of responding only when their buttons are pushed.6

THE  STRATEGIC  PLANNING --the seed -- helps you tie those opportunities to plan and optimize at a high level
over the long term. You can set overall objectives for capital utilization for capital  intensive
equipment, inventory and materials (direct and indirect), and labor.

• Drive tactical and operational plans based on STRATEGIC  vision and direction
• Optimize asset utilization including capacity and materials
• Support growth by identifying and proactively removing constraints
• Reduce risk by evaluating alternatives and outcomes before deciding
• Simplify   make/buy   decisions.

integrates the necessary competitive analyses, peer comparisons, and industry averages
that give STRATEGIC   Planning the proper context.  You see the entire set of
business opportunities and tie the financial analytics to the business issues, activities,
and processes that drive them. The result: a well aligned organization thats positioned
for long-term success.

¥ React faster to market changes
¥ Measure and compare your supply chain performance against competition
¥ Adjust your strategic plan frequently
¥ Analyze the ramifications of M&A opportunities
¥ Avoid excess warehouse capacity and unused equipment
¥ Perform long-range planning and analysis to determine the impact of simultaneous
business decision combinations
¥ Confidently optimize your supply chain network

THE  STRATEGIC  PLANNING    SYSTEM  delivers solutions that synchronize corporate planning with operations planning and
execution on a local and enterprise level, to ensure all assets are utilized to achieve strategic
objectives. This enables manufacturers to reduce the cost of goods sold, shorten lead-times for
orders and reduce inventory costs with improved supply chain collaboration and management.

Real  Solutions...Measurable Results
. Key elements of the strategic planning process.

1. External Assessment  OF  THE  ECONOMY

Areas for opportunities and threats  IN  THE  ECONOMY

* Markets [ what  is  the market  situation, which is forcing the change requirements
*Customers [ how can service the customer -internal / external -better .          
* Industry  [ is  the  industry  trend ]
* Competition [ is  it the  competitive situation      
*Factors of  business [ causing  the change]
* Technology [ is  it  technology  change ]



Political (incl. Legal)   [ [Poltical] EST[Environment][Legal] ]

-Environmental regulations and protection
[what  are  the  government regualtions/ protection laws  that  must be  observed ]

-Tax policies
what tax  hinder the business and what  taxes  incentives  are available]

-International trade regulations and restrictions
[ does  the  government    encourage  exports / with  high tariffs  on  imports]

-Contract enforcement law/Consumer protection
[does  the  government  enforce  on  consumer  protection ]

-Employment laws]
[ is the  government    encouraging  skilled  immigrants  with  temp. permits]

-Government organization / attitude
[ does  the  government  have  a   very  positive  attitude  towards  this   industry]

-Competition regulation
[ are  there   regulation  for  limiting  competition]

-Political Stability
[ politically ,  does the   government    have   a  very   stable  government ]

-Safety regulations
[ has  the  government      adopted  some  of  the  modern  safety regulations]
Economic     [P[Economics][Social]TEL ]

-Economic growth
[  what  is  the economic growth rate  /  what  are  the  reasons ]

-Interest rates & monetary policies
[ are  the  interest  rates    under control /  is there   a  sound  monetary  policies]

-Government spending
[is  government  spending  is  significant   and  is it   under control ]

-Unemployment policy
[what  is  the  employment / unemployment  policies  of the government ]

[  has  the  taxation    encouraged  the  industry ]

-Exchange rates
[ is   there  well  managed   exchange  controls  and  is it  helping  the  industry]

-Inflation rates
[ is  the  inflation  well   under  control ]

-Stage of the business cycle
[ is  your    industry  is  on  the   growth  pattern]

-Consumer confidence
[ is  the  consumer  confidence   is   high/ strong and  if  not, why ]

Social  [ PE[Social]TEL ]

-Income distribution
[is there   balanced   income  distribution   policy ]

-Demographics, Population growth rates, Age distribution
[ what  is   population   growth  and  why ]

-Labor / social mobility
[ what   are the  labor  policies  and  is  there  labor  mobility]

-Lifestyle changes
[ are  there  significant  lifestyle   changes     taking  place--more  modernization/ why  ]

-Work/career and leisure attitudes
[ are  the  population      career  minded  and  are  seeking  better  lifestyle]

[ what  are  the  education  policies /  is  it  successful ]

-Fashion, hypes
[are  the   people    becoming  fashion  conscious ]

-Health consciousness & welfare, feelings on safety
[ are  the  people     becoming  health  consciousness]

-Living conditions
[ is the  living  conditions   improving  fast  and  spreading  rapidly]

Technological  [  PES [Technology] EL]

Government research spending
[is  the  government    spending  on research  and  development]

Industry focus on technological effort
[are  the   industries    focused  on  using  improved  technology]

New inventions and development
[ are  new  inventions     being   encouraged  for  developments]

Rate of technology transfer
[ is  the  rate  of  technology  transfer  is  speeding  up ]

(Changes in) Information Technology
[ is  the   information  technology    rapidly  moving  and  is  there  government  support]

(Changes in) Internet
[ is the   internet  usage    rapidly  increasing   and  why]

(Changes in) Mobile Technology
[is  the   Mobile   technology    rapidly developing  and  is there  government  support]



2. Internal Assessment

Areas  for strengths, weaknesses, and barriers to success

*Culture  [ is the  working  culture  change ]
* Organization [  is the  organization  demanding  change ]
* Systems  [ is it  the  systems change ]
* Management practices  [ change in  managemement process]


*Cost efficiency[  is it for  cost efficiency ]
* Financial  performance  [ is  it for  financial  performance improvement ]
* Quality [ is  it for  quality  performance improvement
*Service [ is  it for  service   performance improvement
*Technology[ is  it for  technology   performance improvement
* Market segments [ is  it for  sales  performance improvement
* Innovation[ is  it for    performance improvement
*new products[ is  it for new product   performance improvement
*Asset condition[ is  it for  financial  performance improvement
*productivity[ is  it for  financial  performance improvement

3. Source  Strategic  objectives  and  programs

The critical issues that must be addressed if the organization
Is  to  succeed








   Your   Core markets;
  Your  CORE  strategic thrusts.


The arena of products, services, customers, technologies, distribution methods, and geography in which you'll compete to get results.

  Desired attitudes and behavior toward internal and external stakeholders that
will yield the culture and business results you want and that you will execute and turn into
action through

-personnel selection.

levels and tiers of strategies

Grow; hold; milk; get out

(Grow; hold; milk)
Market; business unit; product/services

Internal development

Cost /Value/ differentiation


Product      Convenience
Service      Image
Target customer      Geography
Distribution      Product design
Delivery      Quality
Value      Reliability
Pricing      Advertising/promotion


People/skills / Facilities
Organizational /   Product
structure    /         development
Management style   /Incentives/rewards
Training      Spending
Equipment      Sourcing/
technology          /    Systems
R&D          /   Service
FINANCING        /  Quality


Strategy Statement Content

v Priorities and Posture
  Business unit
  Strategic thrust/competitive advantage
  External strategies
  Internal strategic thrust
  Internal strategies
  Strategic fixes
8. Strategic  Program Content



KEY STEPS: who, what, when


PEOPLE: numbers and skills


People and organizational units outside your control who must contribute

LEVERAGE: the high leverage individuals and units who must contribute at lower levels


QUARTERLY: Programs and strategic numbers' progress

Performance appraisal

REWARDS AND CONSEQUENCES: Based on strategic performance of teams and individuals


-corporate  objectives
-corporate   strategies
-targets  for  various  functional  responsibilities
Like  manufacturing /marketing/sales etc
-then  allocates  resources  as  per  the  respective  objectives.


What is ‘Demand Forecasting’? What are its objective and types?

The Importance of Demand Forecasting
Forecasting product demand is crucial to any supplier, manufacturer, or retailer. Forecasts of future demand will determine the quantities that should be purchased, produced, and shipped. Demand forecasts are necessary since the basic operations process, moving from the suppliers' raw materials to finished goods in the customers' hands, takes time. Most firms cannot simply wait for demand to emerge and then react to it. Instead, they must anticipate and plan for future demand so that they can react immediately to customer orders as they occur. In other words, most manufacturers "make to stock" rather than "make to order" – they plan ahead and then deploy inventories of finished goods into field locations. Thus, once a customer order materializes, it can be fulfilled immediately – since most customers are not willing to wait the time it would take to actually process their order throughout the supply chain and make the product based on their order. An order cycle could take weeks or months to go back through part suppliers and sub-assemblers, through manufacture of the product, and through to the eventual shipment of the order to the customer.
Firms that offer rapid delivery to their customers will tend to force all competitors in the market to keep finished good inventories in order to provide fast order cycle times. As a result, virtually every organization involved needs to manufacture or at least order parts based on a forecast of future demand. The ability to accurately forecast demand also affords the firm opportunities to control costs through leveling its production quantities, rationalizing its transportation, and generally planning for efficient logistics operations.
In general practice, accurate demand forecasts lead to efficient operations and high levels of customer service, while inaccurate forecasts will inevitably lead to inefficient, high cost operations and/or poor levels of customer service. In many supply chains, the most important action we can take to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the logistics process is to improve the quality of the demand forecasts.

Forecasting Demand in a Logistics System
Logistics professionals are typically interested in where and when customer demand will materialize. Consider a retailer selling through five superstores in Boston, New York, Detroit, Miami, and Chicago. It is not sufficient to know that the total demand will be 5,000 units per month, or, say, 1,000 units per month per store, on the average. Rather it is important to know, for example, how much the Boston store will sell in a specific month, since specific stores must be supplied with goods at specific times. The requirement might be to forecast the monthly demand for an item at the Boston superstore for the first three months of the next year. Using available historical data, without any further analysis, the best guess of monthly demand in the coming months would probably
be the average monthly sales over the last few years. The analytic challenge is to come up with a better forecast than this simple average.
Since the logistics system must satisfy specific demand, in other words what is needed, where and when, accurate forecasts must be generated at the Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) level, by stocking location, and by time period. Thus, the logistics information system must often generate thousands of individual forecasts each week. This suggests that useful forecasting procedures must be fairly "automatic"; that is, the forecasting method should operate without constant manual intervention or analyst input.
Forecasting is a problem that arises in many economic and managerial contexts, and hundreds of forecasting procedures have been developed over the years, for many different purposes, both in and outside of business enterprises. The procedures that we will discuss have proven to be very applicable to the task of forecasting product demand in a logistics system. Other techniques, which can be quite useful for other forecasting problems, have shown themselves to be inappropriate or inadequate to the task of demand forecasting in logistics systems. In many large firms, several organizations are involved in generating forecasts. The marketing department, for example, will generate high-level long-term forecasts of market demand and market share of product families for planning purposes. Marketing will also often develop short-term forecasts to help set sales targets or quotas. There is frequently strong organizational pressure on the logistics group to simply use these forecasts, rather than generating additional demand forecasts within the logistics system. After all, the logic seems to go, these marketing forecasts cost money to develop, and who is in a better position than marketing to assess future demand, and "shouldn’t we all be working with the same game plan anyway…?"
In practice, however, most firms have found that the planning and operation of an effective logistics system requires the use of accurate, disaggregated demand forecasts. The manufacturing organization may need a forecast of total product demand by week, and the marketing organization may need to know what the demand may be by region of the country and by quarter. The logistics organization needs to store specific SKUs in specific warehouses and to ship them on particular days to specific stores. Thus the logistics system, in contrast, must often generate weekly, or even daily, forecasts at the SKU level of detail for each of hundreds of individual stocking locations, and in most firms, these are generated nowhere else.
An important issue for all forecasts is the "horizon;" that is, how far into the future must the forecast project? As a general rule, the farther into the future we look, the more clouded our vision becomes -- long range forecasts will be less accurate that short range forecasts. The answer depends on what the forecast is used for. For planning new manufacturing facilities, for example, we may need to forecast demand many years into the future since the facility will serve the firm for many years. On the other hand, these forecasts can be fairly aggregate since they need not be SKU-specific or broken out by stockage location. For purposes of operating the logistics system, the forecasting horizon need be no longer than the cycle time for the product. For example, a given logistics system might be able to routinely purchase raw materials, ship them to manufacturing
locations, generate finished goods, and then ship the product to its field locations in, say, ninety days. In this case, forecasts of SKU - level customer demand which can reach ninety days into the future can tell us everything we need to know to direct and control the on-going logistics operation.
It is also important to note that the demand forecasts developed within the logistics system must be generally consistent with planning numbers generated by the production and marketing organizations. If the production department is planning to manufacture two million units, while the marketing department expects to sell four million units, and the logistics forecasts project a total demand of one million units, senior management must reconcile these very different visions of the future.

The Nature of Customer Demand
Most of the procedures in this chapter are intended to deal with the situation where the demand to be forecasted arises from the actions of the firm’s customer base. Customers are assumed to be able to order what, where, and when they desire. The firm may be able to influence the amount and timing of customer demand by altering the traditional "marketing mix" variables of product design, pricing, promotion, and distribution. On the other hand, customers remain free agents who react to a complex, competitive marketplace by ordering in ways that are often difficult to understand or predict. The firm’s lack of prior knowledge about how the customers will order is the heart of the forecasting problem – it makes the actual demand random.
However, in many other situations where inbound flows of raw materials and component parts must be predicted and controlled, these flows are not rooted in the individual decisions of many customers, but rather are based on a production schedule. Thus, if TDY Inc. decides to manufacture 1,000 units of a certain model of personal computer during the second week of October, the parts requirements for each unit are known. Given each part supplier’s lead-time requirements, the total parts requirement can be determined through a structured analysis of the product's design and manufacturing process. Forecasts of customer demand for the product are not relevant to this analysis. TDY, Inc., may or may not actually sell the 1,000 computers, but that is a different issue altogether. Once they have committed to produce 1,000 units, the inbound logistics system must work towards this production target. The Material Requirements Planning (MRP) technique is often used to handle this kind of demand. This demand for component parts is described as dependent demand (because it is dependent on the production requirement), as contrasted with independent demand, which would arise directly from customer orders or purchases of the finished goods. The MRP technique creates a deterministic demand schedule for component parts, which the material manager or the inbound logistics manager must meet. Typically a detailed MRP process is conducted only for the major components (in this case, motherboards, drives, keyboards, monitors, and so forth). The demand for other parts, such as connectors and memory chips, which are used in many different product lines, is often simply estimated and ordered by using statistical forecasting methods such as those described in this chapter.
General Approaches to Forecasting
All firms forecast demand, but it would be difficult to find any two firms that forecast demand in exactly the same way. Over the last few decades, many different forecasting techniques have been developed in a number of different application areas, including engineering and economics. Many such procedures have been applied to the practical problem of forecasting demand in a logistics system, with varying degrees of success. Most commercial software packages that support demand forecasting in a logistics system include dozens of different forecasting algorithms that the analyst can use to generate alternative demand forecasts. While scores of different forecasting techniques exist, almost any forecasting procedure can be broadly classified into one of the following four basic categories based on the fundamental approach towards the forecasting problem that is employed by the technique.
1.   Judgmental Approaches. The essence of the judgmental approach is to address the forecasting issue by assuming that someone else knows and can tell you the right answer. That is, in a judgment-based technique we gather the knowledge and opinions of people who are in a position to know what demand will be. For example, we might conduct a survey of the customer base to estimate what our sales will be next month.
2.   Experimental Approaches. Another approach to demand forecasting, which is appealing when an item is "new" and when there is no other information upon which to base a forecast, is to conduct a demand experiment on a small group of customers and to extrapolate the results to a larger population. For example, firms will often test a new consumer product in a geographically isolated "test market" to establish its probable market share. This experience is then extrapolated to the national market to plan the new product launch. Experimental approaches are very useful and necessary for new products, but for existing products that have an accumulated historical demand record it seems intuitive that demand forecasts should somehow be based on this demand experience. For most firms (with some very notable exceptions) the large majority of SKUs in the product line have long demand histories.
3.   Relational/Causal Approaches. The assumption behind a causal or relational forecast is that, simply put, there is a reason why people buy our product. If we can understand what that reason (or set of reasons) is, we can use that understanding to develop a demand forecast. For example, if we sell umbrellas at a sidewalk stand, we would probably notice that daily demand is strongly correlated to the weather – we sell more umbrellas when it rains. Once we have established this relationship, a good weather forecast will help us order enough umbrellas to meet the expected demand.
4.   "Time Series" Approaches. A time series procedure is fundamentally different than the first three approaches we have discussed. In a pure time series technique, no judgment or expertise or opinion is sought. We do not look for "causes" or relationships or factors which somehow "drive" demand. We do not test items or experiment with

customers. By their nature, time series procedures are applied to demand data that are longitudinal rather than cross-sectional. That is, the demand data represent experience that is repeated over time rather than across items or locations. The essence of the approach is to recognize (or assume) that demand occurs over time in patterns that repeat themselves, at least approximately. If we can describe these general patterns or tendencies, without regard to their "causes", we can use this description to form the basis of a forecast.
In one sense, all forecasting procedures involve the analysis of historical experience into patterns and the projection of those patterns into the future in the belief that the future will somehow resemble the past. The differences in the four approaches are in the way this "search for pattern" is conducted. Judgmental approaches rely on the subjective, ad-hoc analyses of external individuals. Experimental tools extrapolate results from small numbers of customers to large populations. Causal methods search for reasons for demand. Time series techniques simply analyze the demand data themselves to identify temporal patterns that emerge and persist.

Judgmental Approaches to Forecasting
By their nature, judgment-based forecasts use subjective and qualitative data to forecast future outcomes. They inherently rely on expert opinion, experience, judgment, intuition, conjecture, and other "soft" data. Such techniques are often used when historical data are not available, as is the case with the introduction of a new product or service, and in forecasting the impact of fundamental changes such as new technologies, environmental changes, cultural changes, legal changes, and so forth. Some of the more common procedures include the following:
Surveys. This is a "bottom up" approach where each individual contributes a piece of what will become the final forecast. For example, we might poll or sample our customer base to estimate demand for a coming period. Alternatively, we might gather estimates from our sales force as to how much each salesperson expects to sell in the next time period. The approach is at least plausible in the sense that we are asking people who are in a position to know something about future demand. On the other hand, in practice there have proven to be serious problems of bias associated with these tools. It can be difficult and expensive to gather data from customers. History also shows that surveys of "intention to purchase" will generally over-estimate actual demand – liking a product is one thing, but actually buying it is often quite another. Sales people may also intentionally (or even unintentionally) exaggerate or underestimate their sales forecasts based on what they believe their supervisors want them to say. If the sales force (or the customer base) believes that their forecasts will determine the level of finished goods inventory that will be available in the next period, they may be sorely tempted to inflate their demand estimates so as to insure good inventory availability. Even if these biases could be eliminated or controlled, another serious problem would probably remain. Sales people might be able to estimate their weekly dollar volume or total unit sales, but they are not likely to be able to develop credible estimates at the SKU level that the logistics system will require. For
these reasons it will seldom be the case that these tools will form the basis of a successful demand forecasting procedure in a logistics system.
Consensus methods. As an alternative to the "bottom-up" survey approaches, consensus methods use a small group of individuals to develop general forecasts. In a “Jury of Executive Opinion”, for example, a group of executives in the firm would meet and develop through debate and discussion a general forecast of demand. Each individual would presumably contribute insight and understanding based on their view of the market, the product, the competition, and so forth. Once again, while these executives are undoubtedly experienced, they are hardly disinterested observers, and the opportunity for biased inputs is obvious. A more formal consensus procedure, called “The Delphi Method”, has been developed to help control these problems. In this technique, a panel of disinterested technical experts is presented with a questionnaire regarding a forecast. The answers are collected, processed, and re-distributed to the panel, making sure that all information contributed by any panel member is available to all members, but on an anonymous basis. Each expert reflects on the gathering opinion. A second questionnaire is then distributed to the panel, and the process is repeated until a consensus forecast is reached. Consensus methods are usually appropriate only for highly aggregate and usually quite long-range forecasts. Once again, their ability to generate useful SKU level forecasts is questionable, and it is unlikely that this approach will be the basis for a successful demand forecasting procedure in a logistics system.
Judgment-based methods are important in that they are often used to determine an enterprise's strategy. They are also used in more mundane decisions, such as determining the quality of a potential vendor by asking for references, and there are many other reasonable applications. It is true that judgment based techniques are an inadequate basis for a demand forecasting system, but this should not be construed to mean that judgment has no role to play in logistics forecasting or that salespeople have no knowledge to bring to the problem. In fact, it is often the case that sales and marketing people have valuable information about sales promotions, new products, competitor activity, and so forth, which should be incorporated into the forecast somehow. Many organizations treat such data as additional information that is used to modify the existing forecast rather than as the baseline data used to create the forecast in the first place.

Experimental Approaches to Forecasting
In the early stages of new product development it is important to get some estimate of the level of potential demand for the product. A variety of market research techniques are used to this end.
Customer Surveys are sometimes conducted over the telephone or on street corners, at shopping malls, and so forth. The new product is displayed or described, and potential customers are asked whether they would be interested in purchasing the item. While this approach can help to isolate attractive or unattractive product features, experience has shown that "intent to purchase" as measured in this way is difficult to
translate into a meaningful demand forecast. This falls short of being a true “demand experiment”.
Consumer Panels are also used in the early phases of product development. Here a small group of potential customers are brought together in a room where they can use the product and discuss it among themselves. Panel members are often paid a nominal amount for their participation. Like surveys, these procedures are more useful for analyzing product attributes than for estimating demand, and they do not constitute true “demand experiments” because no purchases take place.
Test Marketing is often employed after new product development but prior to a full-scale national launch of a new brand or product. The idea is to choose a relatively small, reasonably isolated, yet somehow demographically "typical" market area. In the United States, this is often a medium sized city such as Cincinnati or Buffalo. The total marketing plan for the item, including advertising, promotions, and distribution tactics, is "rolled out" and implemented in the test market, and measurements of product awareness, market penetration, and market share are made. While these data are used to estimate potential sales to a larger national market, the emphasis here is usually on "fine-tuning" the total marketing plan and insuring that no problems or potential embarrassments have been overlooked. For example, Proctor and Gamble extensively test-marketed its Pringles potato chip product made with the fat substitute Olestra to assure that the product would be broadly acceptable to the market.
Scanner Panel Data procedures have recently been developed that permit demand experimentation on existing brands and products. In these procedures, a large set of household customers agrees to participate in an ongoing study of their grocery buying habits. Panel members agree to submit information about the number of individuals in the household, their ages, household income, and so forth. Whenever they buy groceries at a supermarket participating in the research, their household identity is captured along with the identity and price of every item they purchased. This is straightforward due to the use of UPC codes and optical scanners at checkout. This procedure results in a rich database of observed customer buying behavior. The analyst is in a position to see each purchase in light of the full set of alternatives to the chosen brand that were available in the store at the time of purchase, including all other brands, prices, sizes, discounts, deals, coupon offers, and so on. Statistical models such as discrete choice models can be used to analyze the relationships in the data. The manufacturer and merchandiser are now in a position to test a price promotion and estimate its probable effect on brand loyalty and brand switching behavior among customers in general. This approach can develop valuable insight into demand behavior at the customer level, but once again it can be difficult to extend this insight directly into demand forecasts in the logistics system.

Relational/Causal Approaches to Forecasting
Suppose our firm operates retail stores in a dozen major cities, and we now decide to open a new store in a city where we have not operated before. We will need to forecast
what the sales at the new store are likely to be. To do this, we could collect historical sales data from all of our existing stores. For each of these stores we could also collect relevant data related to the city's population, average income, the number of competing stores in the area, and other presumably relevant data. These additional data are all referred to as explanatory variables or independent variables in the analysis. The sales data for the stores are considered to be the dependent variable that we are trying to explain or predict.
The basic premise is that if we can find relationships between the explanatory variables (population, income, and so forth) and sales for the existing stores, then these relationships will hold in the new city as well. Thus, by collecting data on the explanatory variables in the target city and applying these relationships, sales in the new store can be estimated. In some sense the posture here is that the explanatory variables "cause" the sales. Mathematical and statistical procedures are used to develop and test these explanatory relationships and to generate forecasts from them. Causal methods include the following:
Econometric models, such as discrete choice models and multiple regression. More elaborate systems involving sets of simultaneous regression equations can also be attempted. These advanced models are beyond the scope of this book and are not generally applicable to the task of forecasting demand in a logistics system.
Input-output models estimate the flow of goods between markets and industries. These models ensure the integrity of the flows into and out of the modeled markets and industries; they are used mainly in large-scale macro-economic analysis and were not found useful in logistics applications.
Life cycle models look at the various stages in a product's "life" as it is launched, matures, and phases out. These techniques examine the nature of the consumers who buy the product at various stages ("early adopters," "mainstream buyers," "laggards," etc.) to help determine product life cycle trends in the demand pattern. Such models are used extensively in industries such as high technology, fashion, and some consumer goods facing short product life cycles. This class of model is not distinct from the others mentioned here as the characteristics of the product life cycle can be estimated using, for example, econometric models. They are mentioned here as a distinct class because the overriding "cause" of demand with these models is assumed to be the life cycle stage the product is in.
Simulation models are used to model the flows of components into manufacturing plants based on MRP schedules and the flow of finished goods throughout distribution networks to meet customer demand. There is little theory to building such simulation models. Their strength lies in their ability to account for many time lag effects and complicated dependent demand schedules. They are, however, typically cumbersome and complicated.
Time Series Approaches to Forecasting
Although all four approaches are sometimes used to forecast demand, generally the time-series approach is the most appropriate and the most accurate approach to generate the large number of short-term, SKU level, locally dis-aggregated forecasts required to operate a physical distribution system over a reasonably short time horizon. On the other hand, these time series techniques may not prove to be very accurate. If the firm has knowledge or insight about future events, such as sales promotions, which can be expected to dramatically alter the otherwise expected demand, some incorporation of this knowledge into the forecast through judgmental or relational means is also appropriate.
Many different time series forecasting procedures have been developed. These techniques include very simple procedures such as the Moving Average and various procedures based on the related concept of Exponential Smoothing. These procedures are extensively used in logistics systems, and they will be thoroughly discussed in this chapter. Other more complex procedures, such as the Box-Jenkins (ARIMA) Models, are also available and are sometimes used in logistics systems. However, in most cases these more sophisticated tools have not proven to be superior to the simpler tools, and so they are not widely used in logistics systems. Our treatment of them here will therefore be brief.


Careers: Business

All Answers

Answers by Expert:

Ask Experts


Leo Lingham


I can answer the following -career opportunities -planning a career -development plans for career -self development needs -training plans for individuals -growth plans for individuals.

©2016 All rights reserved.