You are here:

Careers: Physics/Predictibality of radioactive decays

Advertisement


Question
Hi Daniel,

I have read about radioactivity and do know that we cannot
predict when a nucleus will decay.

Where does this uncertainty come from? Does it come from
Quantum Mechanics (I doubt it does) or where?

Or is it just that nobody has been able to work this out
from even more fundamental laws(if they are there) of
nuclei, due to the complexity involved?

Or is it simply the case that nobody has any clue where this
uncertainty comes from?

A similar question would be related to the emission of
radiation of atoms or the change in state of polarization of
unpolarized light with time. We have similar kinds of  
"randomness" associated with these phenomenon too. Why?

Thanks,
Shikhin

Answer
Hi Shikhin,

radioactive decay is described by quantum theory. Processes like this one have no better description for two reasons: 1) the uncertainty relations don't allow us, from principle, to know both position and momentum to an arbitrary precision 2) we have no way to measure the momentum of a subatomic particle inside an atom nucleus anyway.

The first point is fairly straightforward, when you realize that you need those quantities to describe motion of any body classically. The second point stems from the fact, that we can measure anything about nuclei only by detecting some kind of radiation that has been emitted from the nucleus or else radiated from an external source and scattered by the nucleus. Both approaches lead to a purely statistical analysis, because neither our detectors nor our radiation sources work with anything near a size-of-nucleus precision. Remember that there are only a handful of experimental methods, which allow us to distinguish atoms, i.e. objects 10000 times larger than nuclei.

Take care,
Daniel

Careers: Physics

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Daniel Mazur

Expertise

Questions anyone (teenager, undergrad, graduate, professional) may ask on physics, mathematics or inorganic chemistry. Questions may concern subjects themselves or a possible future career in them, if you need advice on a school or hobby project, or you just came across a question that is beyond your current curriculum. I answer bare textbook problems sometimes, but I reserve the the right to redirect you to Physics-Physics section. The kind of questions I like to answer: I just started having science classes at school and they seem difficult, but I enjoy them. Where do I find more information on this, which is not in textbooks but still comprehensible to me? Just leaving high school, and I feel science is really the thing for me. Can you recommend a school and an undergrad program suitable to my inclinations? I am in my second undergraduate year in Physics. We learned the basics of universe expanding this year, the Hubble constant and all that, but invited speakers that gave talks on astrophysics in our department seemed not to agree with this model at all. Is it of any use at all? I am building a [materials research] experimental device for my masters/doctorate thesis and I have the following problem:... I have tried ..., but it still doesn't work. Where might the problem be?

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.