You are here:

Civil Engineering/PT Slab Cost Effectiveness

Advertisement


Question
Dr Khan,

I am told that PT slab is the most cost effective structural system, but I am a little skeptical about this.  I believe that PT slab is only cost effective upto a certain point.  But i do not know where this point is in oder to determine whether to use beam/slab or PT slab.

In my case, we have spans of 10m with live loads of 5kPa and SDL of 6kPa.  Is PT slab still considered the most cost effective since published literature tells me I will require L/D of approx 30-35 hence a slab thickness of approx 300mm.  I have carried out an assessment weight per floor based on the above and find that beam/slab gives me more savings in terms of concrete required (one way slab 160mm thick supported on beam approx 400x600 @ 3.33m c/c), which translate to further saving in foundation.

The only difference therefore is the saving in the steel reinforcement.  Is this saving significant without going further into the more detailed design?

Please can you give me your opinion.

Kind Regards,

Marcus

Answer
Hi Marcus,

You are quite correct. In purely terms of materials (concrete/rebar), RC slabs are more economical than PT. In my experience, for spans of between 6-10m, a one-way ribbed slab (with down-stand beams)is about the most economical.

However, if you take other considerations into account, such as speed of construction, cost/time for shuttering and floor-to-floor heights (where a flat slab is beneficial to keep heights to a minimum, with least restrictions to MEP ducts, etc), then flat slabs (PT or RC) may be desireable.

The decision can vary due to local market conditions- if labour is relatively cheap, then RC may be cheaper- in Europe and USA, flat slabs (RC or PT) may be cheaper all round. Remember also that PT cannot be used in all circumstances (where there are voids or restraint to comopression of slab).

These days building green is in fashion, which means minimising materials, so perhaps speed will be given less importance. Also, in high seismic zones, the lighter the floors, the better!

This is a very good publication, but for the Europe market:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19184820/Economic-Long-Span-Concrete-Floor-Slabs

Civil Engineering

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Arshad Khan

Expertise

I can answer any questions to do with civil and structural engineering consultancy and construction industry in East Africa and the Middle East, and specifically with the analysis and design of reinforced concrete structures. My particular expertise is in the aseismic design and optimisation of tall buildings.

Experience

Employment history: 36 years in Construction and consultancy in the UK, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, Eritrea, South Africa, Somalia, Zambia, Austria, Bahrain, Kuwait, Doha and the U.A.E.

Organizations
.Fellow of Institution of Structural Engineers (UK) .Fellow of Institution of Civil Engineers(UK) .Member of the Institution of Engineers, Kenya .Registered Engineer, ERB, Kenya .Member of the Architectural Association of Kenya (Engineers Chapter) .Chartered Engineer (UK)

Publications
•1984: International Conference on the Art and Practice of Structural Design, London •1994: 3rd Int. Kerensky Conference in Structural Engineering, Singapore •2008: International Conference on High-Rise Towers, Abu Dhabi

Education/Credentials
BSc, 1st Class Hons, in Building Engineering, University of Bath, UK MSc in Concrete Structures and Technology, University of London. Diploma of Imperial College, UK.

Awards and Honors
•Science Congress Special Award (for 2-seater Hovercraft - 1968) •Institution of Civil Engineers Award for outstanding performance at Bath University (1975) •Concrete Society Postgraduate study Bursary Award (1976) •Consular Representative for British High Commission, Nairobi. (1995 to 1998) •Examiner for Institution of Civil Engineers Professional Interviews, Nairobi. (1997 to 1998) •Branch Representative in Vienna for PI assessment for Inst. of Struct. Engrs. (1999 to date)

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.