AllExperts > Collections Law 
Search      
Collections Law
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Collections Law Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Collections Law Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Collections Law
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Jason Shear, Esq.
Expertise
I can answer questions relating to consumer debt defense/collection agency defense, specifically pertaining to consumers being sued or harassed by collection agencies or NY collection attorneys. If you live in New York and have been contacted or sued by firms such as: Mel Harris & Associates, Forster & Garbus, Rubin & Rothman, Mann Braken, Lacy Katzen, Malen & Associates, Solomon & Solomon, Thomas Law Office, Cohen & Slamowitz, Bronson & Migliaccio, Pressler & Pressler or others; give me a call at (716) 566-8988.

Experience
I have successfully defended consumers who were sued by collection agencies/debt purchasers in the New York State courts.

Education/Credentials
BA/BS, Accounting & Political Science, Hunter College. Juris Doctor, Univ. at Buffalo Law School. LLM (Criminal Law), University at Buffalo.

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Business > Corporate Law > Collections Law > Sued by Midland Funding

Collections Law - Sued by Midland Funding


Expert: Jason Shear, Esq. - 7/8/2009

Question
QUESTION: Hi:

I was served a debt collection lawsuit by a NYC collection law firm a couple of months ago.  I filed an answer.  It pertains to an old credit card I had years ago.  

Yesterday, I received in the mail from the collection agency's lawyer a "notice to admit".  It states in it if I do not answer within twenty days of receipt the questions are deemed admitted.  It asks if I had the account with the credit card company and if I applied for credit with the original credit card company.  What do I do?  Thank you for your help.

ANSWER: John:

Good question.  Debt buyers in particular may have little evidence to establish their case, and little interest in obtaining the evidence.  Instead, they may try to win their case using your own admissions.  Shortly after a consumer files an Answer, the collector will send the consumer/defendant a lengthy list of statements, asking you to admit to them, hoping you will not respond in a timely manner.  

Failure to respond is treated as an admission of all the requested statements.  The debt buyer's attorney then appends those statements to a summary judgment motion and seeks to prevail in the third party debt collection case although presenting little or none of its own evidence.  By serving a Notice to Admit collectors prey on unrepresented New York consumers' lack of legal knowledge, attempting to prove their case by sleight of hand when they can not do so by evidence in the NY Courts.

The Notice To Admit sent to you by this debt collection law firm is improper.  A Notice to Admit in New York is restricted to several narrow limits including those items as to which the party requesting the admission reasonably believes there can be no substantial dispute at trial and which are within the knowledge of such other party or can be ascertained by him or her upon reasonable inquiry.  A notice to admit can not be used as a substitute for existing discovery devices or a subterfuge for obtaining further discovery.  In addition, a notice to admit can not be used to ask questions pertaining to the heart of the dispute.

If you owe this debt and applied for credit with the alleged original creditor is the heart of the dispute.  As such, Plaintiff's notice to admit is improper.

What you need to do is file a Motion pursuant to New York CPLR 3103 to strike the Plaintiff's (the debt buyer's) notice to admit on the grounds that the requests for admission were improper under CPLR 3123.

Hope this answers your question.  If you have any other questions, please to not hesitate to call.

Jason Shear, Esq.
Admitted in NY & NJ
(716) 566-8988



Search keywords: Debt Defense Attorney, Debt Defense Lawyer, Collection Agency Defense NY, Credit Card Defense NY, Sued by Collection Agency, Sued by Debt Buyer, Sued by Debt Collector, Sued by NY Collection Law Firm, Debt Collection Defense Help, NY Consumer Law, Vacate NY Default Judgment, Sued by Creditor, Buffalo Debt Defense, NY Debt Defense, NY Consumer Attorney, NY Consumer Lawyer.

---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------

QUESTION: Thank you for that informative response.  Is there a fee to make the motion?  The case was brought in the City Court where I live.  Thanks, John from NY.

Answer
John:

No, there are no fees to bring Motions in the City Courts within New York State.  If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to ask.

Jason Shear, Esq.
Admitted in NY & NJ
(716) 566-8988




Search keywords:  New Century Financial,  Asset Acceptance, Midland Funding, LR Credit, Hilco, Palisades Collection, Pinpoint Technologies, Cavalry Portfolio, LVNV Funding, Rushmore Recoveries, North Star Capital, Portfolio Recovery, NCO, Unifund, PRA, Velocity Investments, Great Seneca Financial, Midland Credit Management, Sherman Acquisition, MRC Receivables, Worldwide Asset Purchasing, Atlantic Credit & Finance, Centurion Capital, Firstcity Financial, Encore Capital Group, Asta Funding, Greater Niagara Holdings, Collect America, CACH, CACV, Arrow Financial Services, Empire Portfolios, Metro Portfolios, RJM Acquisitions, NCO Portfolio Management.

Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.