You are here:

Collections Law/Sued by Cohen & Slamowitz

Advertisement


Question
QUESTION: Hi:

I was sued by Cohen and Slamowitz earlier this year.  Their client is a collection agency that bought my old credit card account.  I sent in a general denial as my answer.  When I was doing some research I read some of your posts that said making the debt buyer prove "standing" is an important defense in these cases.

Unfortanely, I did not have any affirmative defenses in my answer.
I also read that according to NY law I only had 20 days to amend my answer to use the defense that they lack standing.  Is there anything I can do?

I don't want to lose an important defense!  I live in New York.  Thank You!


ANSWER: Paula:

Good question.  Yes, making the plaintiff prove standing is an important defense in a case brought by a debt buyer.  The plaintiff seeking to recover on this alleged account has the burden of proof to show that it has the right to seek collection on the obligation because it owns your account.  You should not have to litigate a debt with one collection agency, only to find out later that another agency is the true owner and that you must now litigate the same claim with this second party.

In your case, the collection agency can not merely show that it received an assignment of the obligation, if the assignor was not the original creditor.  Instead, the plaintiff must show a continuous, unbroken chain of assignments from the original creditor to the entity collecting on the debt.  The plaintiff must prove that it owns your alleged debt through tender of proper documentation specifically relating to your particular account at issue.  It is important to remember that mere affirmation of the assignment in an affidavit is insufficient; the collection agency/plaintiff must submit actual contracts of assignment identifying the account at issue (your account), with proper authentication of those accounts using affidavits.    

You need to file a Motion pursuant to New York CPLR 3025(b) for leave to file an Amended Verified Answer to assert the affirmative defense that the plaintiff lacks standing.

The case law and statutory law of New York clearly establishes that if a party recognizes a defect in their pleadings, even if the time to freely amend has passed, that party should be granted leave to amend absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from a delay.

Hope this answers your question.  If you have any follow up questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to ask.

Jason Shear, Esq.
Shear Law Firm, P.C.
Attorney at Law
Admitted in NY & NJ
4160 Harlem Rd.
Buffalo, New York 14226
Phone: (716) 566-8988


---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------

QUESTION: Thank you so much for that great response and informative answer.  However, handling this case seems to too overwhelming and complicated for me.  Do you represent consumers in these cases?  I live in NYC and notice you are in Buffalo, can you take my case?  Thanks!

Answer
Paula,

Yes, I handle consumer cases in New York City.  Please call me directly for help with this case.

Jason Shear, Esq.
Shear Law Firm, P.C.
Attorney at Law
Admitted in NY & NJ
4160 Harlem Rd.
Buffalo, New York 14226
Phone: (716) 566-8988





Search Keywords:  Sued by Creditor, NY Debt Defense, Collection Agency Defense, Sued by Debt Collector, NY Consumer Debt Defense Attorney, Sued by Collection Agency, Credit Card Defense, Sued by a Debt Buyer, NY Debt Defense Lawyer, NY Consumer Attorney, Sued by Asset Acceptance, Sued by Midland Funding, Sued by LVNV Funding, Arbitration Defense, Sued by LR Credit, Sued by Pinpoint Technologies, NY Consumer Credit Transaction, Sued by Palisades Collection, Vacate Default Judgment, Sued by New Century Financial, Sued by Rushmore Recovery, Sued by North Star Capital, Buffalo Debt Defense, Sued by Encore Capital, Sued by Unifund, NY Debt Collection Lawsuit, Sued by Portfolio Recovery, NY Consumer Lawyer, Sued by Empire Portfolio, Sued by Asta Funding, Help with Creditors, Sued by Velocity Investments, NY Debt Settlement Help, Sued by Metro Portfolios, Sued by CACH, Sued by Cavalry Portfolio, Sued by Worldwide Asset Purchasing, Sued by RAB Performance Recovery, Sued by Legal Servicing, Sued by Erin Capital Management.

Collections Law

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Jason Shear, Esq.

Expertise

I can answer questions for residents of New York and New Jersey regarding creditor harassment claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA); credit reporting errors under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA); debt collection defense/credit card defense; student loan law; and consumer class actions. I can also answer questions relating to consumer debt defense/collection agency defense, specifically pertaining to consumers being sued or harassed by collection agencies or NY collection attorneys. If you live in New York and have been contacted or sued by firms such as: Mel Harris & Associates, Forster & Garbus, Rubin & Rothman, Choi Law Office, Lacy Katzen, Malen & Associates, Solomon & Solomon, Daniels & Norelli, Cohen & Slamowitz, Pressler & Pressler or others; give us a call at (716) 831-1111.

Experience

I have obtained settlements for consumers in NY and NJ under the FDCPA and FCRA. I have successfully defended consumers who were sued by collection agencies/debt purchasers in the New York State courts. Visit our website at: www.brentandshear.com

Organizations
National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) Brent & Shear, P.C. Consumer Attorneys 3957 Main Street, Second Floor Buffalo, New York 14226 (716) 831-1111

Education/Credentials
BA/BS, Accounting & Political Science, Hunter College. Juris Doctor, Univ. at Buffalo Law School. LLM (Criminal Law), University at Buffalo.

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.