Commercial Real Estate Investment/Small office building in CBD

Advertisement


Question
Hello Jim
I am trying to find how to maximise my tax position for for a small office building in the Auckland CBD area, New Zealand, for a Family trust, that is.
Also, I'm trying to find out how I can share the OPEX costs with my landlord under a net lease approach.
The following, are some answers I came up with and I'm wondering if they could be correct by any chance;
Tax maximization on income can be achieved through mainly; interest on loan and depreciation, also the liability of all operational expenses costs by claiming tax return on all claimed expenses including;
•   Accounting fees
•   Advertising
•   Agents fees an commission
•   Communication
•   Insurance
•   Legal fees
•   Mortgage repayment insurance (fully deductible if for property rental purpose)
•   Motor vehicles
•   Rates (Fully deductible)
•   Repairs and maintenance (only minor repairs for the first Year)
Second question:
Only, energy (electricity, gas, etc), insurance and rates together make up nearly over 50% of the actual annual cost of operating expenses.
Insurance costs can be quite high depending on the location of the property that is regarded as a risk (earthquake, flood, etc) to the insurer’s firms.
OPEX costs also depends on the property grade, for example in Auckland CBD
A grade will cost around $114/m2
B grade will cost around $86/m2
C grade will cost around $73/m2
The economic downturn leads property owners to an increase pressure in holding down OPEX charges, meanwhile, tenants look to minimise their occupancy costs (Nicholas Piper Bayleys Property Services).
In Wellington, landlords consider OPEX as a package included in the actual rental cost that is part the gross lease approach for years, as for Auckland; the net lease approach is the most common method that has been operating for years. However, in a downturn economic climate as mentioned above, landlords must contribute with some of the OPEX costs with the Tenants in order to prevent any vacancy.
In reference to Piper’s report, in some places of the country including Auckland, the increase of vacancies will have to keep most landlords away from the net lease knowing that Tenants in our days are more aware and focused a lot on their occupancy costs on the top of the rental figure.
Even though we have the task to protect our Clients interests to an extent, does not mean to lead our Client into vacancy and financial loss position, therefore, the Family trust should come to some sort of arrangements with the future potential Tenant to share some of the OPEX costs.
At a first stage, it is essentially important to consider that repair and maintenance works costs are undertaken by the tenant on the top of energy expenses, with occasional site visits that is.


Answer
Marco:

I am not certain that I understand what your intentions/goals are regarding the Net lease arrangement.

As you know, a Net Lease is an agreement for the landlord to allow the tenant to occupy the property for a stipulated payment of rent over the lease term, and the tenant agrees to pay all of the other costs necessary to operate and maintain the property in essentially the same condition as it was received from the landlord.  Often the agreement will provide that the occupant will pay the debt service for the property.

Virtually any arrangements can be inserted into the Net Lease structure that revise the terms of who pays for what expenses as long as both parties agree in writing.  Regardless of the state of the economy, any revisions to the Net Lease agreement are a matter that must be negotiated by the parties.

If you believe the family trust is going to lose an existing tenant because the tenant cannot continue to pay for the costs stipulated in the lease, or the trust will not be able to find an interested tenant to Net Lease the property because the terms being offered are more than a prospective tenant will pay in this economy, then you should advise the trust of the Net Lease terms you believe are - in your judgement - necessary to retain an existing tenant, or to successfully find a new tenant.

Always be certain that site visits are frequent.  It is in the interest of both parties that the property continues to be maintained in good condition.

I am not certain I understood your question, please send a follow-up question to clarify your concerns if I have not given you a response that is helpful.

Good luck,

-Jim  

Commercial Real Estate Investment

All Answers


Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Jim Avancena, CPM

Expertise

Best qualified to answer questions that involve commercial leases, that is, basic issues as well as the often unexpected effects of the complexities and inter-relationships of the provisions a lease may contain, explain how seemingly innocuous text in your lease can have a major impact on a Tenant or Landlord and their business operations, and the common practices utilized in the industry. I can untangle most matters that may come up from the time a tenant begins searching for a office or store space and the lease acquisition process, concerns related to remodeling/improving the leased premises, moving-in, subletting or assigning the leased space, and a long list of problems that may come up during the lease term and even after a tenant moves out. I have practical experience with most property management issues and resolving landlord and tenant disputes - especially those involving what may appear to be overcharges assessed for additional lease charges like CAM costs, operating expense reimbursement, real estate taxes, utilities, construction improvements etc. Note that I am not an attorney and cannot provide legal advice.

Experience

Thirty years active experience in the commercial real estate industry as a licensed real estate broker in the Washington DC Metro area (DC, Northern Virginia & Maryland). I have been admitted (approved) by the Maryland and DC courts to testify as an expert witness on the subjects of Commercial Leasing and Property Management in the area of standard industry practices. I have had a business for the last 14 years advising virtually every form of business entity from large national corporations to the smallest ma & pa new businesses regarding a wide range of commercial real estate matters in addition to property management and commercial leasing.

Organizations
Currently my three children keep me so busy that it is difficult to participate in organizations with continuing and specific time requirements.

Publications
I publish a local commercial real estate newsletter titled: "Tenants First". My firm was the subject of a high profile Washington Post business section cover page (2.25 full pages) feature story on January 13, 1993; titled "Overcharging Overhead".

Education/Credentials
BA in Political Science from Memphis University, and five years of study in the real estate development summer program at MIT. I was certified as a commercial property manager (CPM-IREM), and currently hold a brokers license in Maryland and the District of Columbia.

Awards and Honors
The same plaques and honors that most others in my industry have earned. I have none that I consider especially meaningful.

Past/Present Clients
Past clients include: The World Bank, George Washington University, National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, US Department of Commerce, The American Benefits Council, K-Mart Development, many law firms, a national union, other major organizations, and many, many small business firms and retail operators that I am most honored to serve. I estimate more than 1,500 firms/organizations.

©2012 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.