AllExperts > Construction & Contractors 
Search      
Construction & Contractors
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Construction & Contractors Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Construction & Contractors Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Construction & Contractors
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Robert Cummings, P.E.
Expertise
I can answer questions related to rock blasting, rock and soil excavation (such as tunnels and highway cuts), stability of such excavations, and foundations in rock and soil. I can also answer questions related to geology and mining.

Experience
30+ years as a geotechnical engineer and minerals engineer. Active consulting practice in rock blasting, geotechnical engineering, and rock mechanics for mining and heavy construction.

Organizations
Society of Mining Engineers, Deep Foundations Institute, Association of Engineering Geologists, and International Society of Explosives Engineers.

Publications
Mining Engineering, AEG Bulletin.

Education/Credentials
BS and MS Geological Engineering

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Education > Votech Education > Construction & Contractors > Dir. Horizontal Boring - Test data required?

Construction & Contractors - Dir. Horizontal Boring - Test data required?


Expert: Robert Cummings, P.E. - 3/20/2008

Question
Hi,
We, a state DOT, need to install about 700' of utility pipes by primarily subsurface methods.  We've done the required research to know what's involved, but I'm unsure about the test data needed to provide to bidders sufficient information to make the job biddable.  Are Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) sufficient, or is a log of test borings with actual drilled samples required?  We have drilled samples available for an adjacent location, but I assume that over the 700' run conditions could vary enough that those results won't help much.  The CPT is much faster and easier than drilling, so that's my preferance.
Thanks for any insights you can provide.

Answer
I think it kind of depends on where you are and what geotechnical conditions are extant.  If for example you are in Kansas City where there is a lot of loess soil that will be crossed by the utility, then not much variation is expected and you can probably get away with CPT.  If on the other hand you are in the Basin and Range area of the West and there is a chance of interbedded cobbles and sands, then the likely variability dictates that you should protect yourself with actual soil borings.

Because you apparently feel that the soil samples from an adjacent location may not be fully representative, I suspect you are in the latter category.  However, if you have CPT data from the adjoining location, you may be able to relate the CPT signatures to actual samples and then have more confidence in what CPT by itself will mean on the 700 ft alignment.

CPT will not give you information on the distribution of cobbles or on the role or size of coarse particles which might cause problems with directional control and the withdrawal of cuttings.  Also, it may not give you information on highly permeable conditions which may cause loss of drilling circulation, or of high ground water conditions which could in some cases cause problems with site water control.  It will give you an overall understanding of hardness and drillability.

There are a number of directional drilling contractors at national scale who would be willing to answer your specific questions about your site.

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.