Construction Law/Engineer’s obligations under Sub-Clause 20.1 & 3.5
We are using FIDIC MDB 2010 conditions of contract for Construction. I am confused with the Engineers role when claim under clause 20.1 received and Engineer determination under sub-clause 3.5. Sub-Clause 20.1 requires the Engineer to respond with approval or with disapproval and detailed comments to claim within 42 days. This Sub-Clause also obliges the Engineer to determine this matter under sub-clause 3.5 within the above defined time period of 42 days. Sub-Clause 3.5 put a time limit of 28 days (from the receipt of the Claim) on the Engineer to complete the determination process. My queries are as follows:
(a) Will the Engineer proceed separately under Sub-Clause 3.5 & 20.1?
(b) Is it possible to determine the matter first within 28days and then reply to claim with approval and disapproval within 42 days?
(c) If the Engineer wants to combine determination and approval with detailed comments, then which time period prevail 28 days or 42 days?
Dear Umer Shabbir,
Thank you for this question.
If I can refer you again to sub-clause 3.5 the wording is that the Engineer shall shall give notice within 28 days "except when otherwise specified", thereby allowing a shorter, or longer time where other clauses detail.
You have noted that under sub-clause 20.1 the Engineer is allowed the longer period of 42 days. This longer time will be applicable.
I hope that this assists you.
Follow me on Twitter: @CernoOrg
For my regular industry newsletter e-mail to email@example.com, stating SUBSCRIBE in the subject line
Training and consulting services are available, bespoke to companies and individuals.
John Dowse can be contacted by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org (When e-mailing, please include “AllExperts” in the subject line.)