Construction Law/right of Nominated Sub to claim directly to Owner and Contractor to indemnify from such action
We are Project Managers on a Project under FIDIC 99 red book with amendments (COPA). There is one main contractor and nominated Subs that are back to back toward the Contract with the main contractor.
My Questions are:
1-Does a nominated Subcontractor have the right to claim or to sue an Owner directly without passing by the main contractor ?
2- Does the Main Contractor have the duty to indemnify the Owner in such case?
3- Can a claim for EoT and assoiated compensation initiated by a Subcontractor be subject to a law suit and allowing the juridical entity placing the hand on the Project ? What is the role/duty of the main contractor in such case?
Will the case be refuted by the judge?
Kindly refer to specific FIDIC Clauses
Thank you for this question. Unfortunately there is insufficient information to be able to provide you with any reasonable answer.
Firstly the terms agreed by the Employer with the nominated sub-contractor, before the subcontract is taken on by the Contractor, will be key. Secondly, the legal jurisdiction will be important, as some provide for third party rights, which may give rise to a subcontractor (even a domestic subcontractor) having a right of action against an Employer. Thirdly, the extent of the Contractor's liability to indemnify the Employer will be determined by the terms of the contract between the Employer/Contractor.
I am sorry that I cannot assist further at this time.
Follow me on Twitter: @CernoOrg
For my regular industry newsletter e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, stating SUBSCRIBE in the subject line
Training and consulting services are available, bespoke to companies and individuals.
John Dowse can be contacted by e-mail to email@example.com (When e-mailing, please include “AllExperts” in the subject line.)