You are here:

Construction Law/Contracts Management


Dear Mr Mike,
 Let me first appreciate your commendable efforts for sharing your
 I have two queries on Contracts Management. The Contract is for an
 Engineering Project and the Employer is a PSU (in Indian scenario).
 The Contract was terminated by Employer due to breach of contract.
 Agitated Contractor invoked Arbitration clause and Arbitral
 proceedings are on.
 Query No.1.Employer bifurcated the entire balance works into several
 works and called tenders for all the balance work after recasting the
 estimate. Though the entire work was awarded to the  Contractor on
 Open Tender basis, for few of the balance works, Limited Tender was
 called and one of the balance work was entrusted on nomination basis
 also. Now if the Employer lodges counter claim towards the excess
 expenditure incurred to complete the balance works (by way of risk
 purchase), can it be entertained? If so on what basis.

 Query No.2.Employer during pre-award discussion obtained additional
 Bank Guarantee over and above what has been envisaged in Terms &
 Conditions; of course with the consent(by way of Minutes of Meeting
 signed by both the parties)of the Contractor.This BG is for
 successful completion of a portion of work which the Contractor
 reportedly under quoted and as on the date of termination this
 portion of work was completed successfully. The Employer is
 withholding the BG and yet to return.Is the Employer  entitled to
 withhold the same even after completion of the specific work?
 Thank you in anticipation."

Hi Natarajan
A complex situation.
As far as I understand it here goes.
After the termination the Employer set up a number of contracts for the remaining works.
One contractor won all the tenders. So we have One Contractor on One Site operating Several Different Contracts. Unless there is a cross liability clause this is a real problem for an Employer because:
If the Contractor defaults on one contract and causes delay on the others then the contractor's default becomes the Employer's responsibility on the other contracts.

Query 1. One of the Contracts was not tendered but let on a "nomination basis" which implies that the scope of work was unclear but a sum of money was allocated to carry it out. If I am right the Contractor has a duty of care not to waste the Employer's money and to explain why more is being spent as and when it happens. If the Contractor just finishes the work and sends the Employer a much bigger bill then the Employer is right to complain.

Query 2. The BG was for a portion of work that was completed successfully before termination of the original contract. If it was all part of the SAME contract - not split into many smaller contracts - then the precise wording of the BG would have to be assessed before a clear answer can be given. On the face of it the Employer is in his rights to withhold release of the BG. A local lawyer can give you a more definitive answer.

Best regards
Mike Testro

Construction Law

All Answers

Answers by Expert:

Ask Experts


Mike Testro


Anything related to extensions of time and delay analysis.


45 years in the Construction Industry 15 Years as a consultant delay analyst - I now hold myself to be expert in this field.

Society of Construction Law Adjudication Society ex Planning Engineers Organisation

6 articles on the relevance of the India Contract Act 1872 and its relevance to modern construction in India. Waiting Publication

Associate Member of the Institue of Building

Past/Present Clients
Currently employed in India by Punj Lloyd as expert delay analyst. Engaged in ongoing arbitrations and EoT claims. Prior an Indepenent consultant in delay analysis.

©2016 All rights reserved.