Construction Law/EoT - Milestones
Dear John Dowse
“Mr Engineer, you have granted me 20 days for Milestone 1 thus I am entitled to 20 days for all subsequent Milestones also”
“No, you must demonstrate that when you add the Relevant Events impacting M1to any other Events occurring from end of M1 to M2 what impact they have on M2. It is does not follow that award of 20 days for M1 automatically knocks on for further Milestones. Otherwise I would need to give you an award for subsequent Milestones at the same time as award for M1.”
Who is correct?
If there are no further delaying Events then Final Milestone extended 20 days?
Thank you for this question.
The theory behind the Engineer's response is correct. When any extension of time is awarded on a Milestone the Contractor must prove that the subsequent Milestones and the Time for Completion are also delayed in order to get an extension on those aspects. The correct approach, in my view, is to perform a delay analysis on the programme of works taking each of the delay events in chronological sequence and examining the impact of each as it compounds the earlier events. An extension of the time for completing works associated with Milestone #1 will not automatically translate through to subsequent Milestones and/or the Completion Date.
I hope that this assists you.
Follow me on Twitter: @CernoOrg
For my regular industry newsletter e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, stating SUBSCRIBE in the subject line; or visit www.cerno.org
Training and consulting services are available, bespoke to companies and individuals.
John Dowse can be contacted by e-mail to email@example.com (When e-mailing, please include “AllExperts” in the subject line.)