AllExperts > Construction Law 
Search      
Construction Law
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Construction Law Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Construction Law Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Construction Law
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Peter M. Elliott
Expertise
First response to queries regarding extensions of time, variations orders, site instructions and payment using FIDIC and other forms of Conditions of Contract, based on English Law, and derivatives only.

Experience
Value . . .
It's unwise to pay too much, but it's unwise to pay too little. When you pay too much you lose a little money, that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing you bought it to do.
The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot. It can't be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it's well to add something for the risk you run.
And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better.
. . . John Ruskin (1819 - 1900)
"We are too poor to buy something cheap"
.Romanian Proverb 2002
A lean compromise is better than a fat lawsuit. George Herbert (English poet 1593-1633)
I said it in Hebrew, I said it in Dutch,
I said it in German and Greek:
But I wholly forgot (and it vexes me much)
That English is what you speak!" Hunting of the Snark - Lewis Caroll
Match your presentation to the reader!
The joy of food lasts but an hour, of sleep but a day, of a woman, but a month, but the joy of a building lasts a lifetime. Syrian proverb.
Comments and observations leading to improvements in the translation of FIDIC Red & Yellow books into Romanian prior to approval by FIDIC (reference 'Preface to the Romanian edition')

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Industry > Construction Industry > Construction Law > Non-Verbal Contract - Construction

Construction Law - Non-Verbal Contract - Construction


Expert: Peter M. Elliott - 6/15/2004

Question
Hello,
I had a non-verbal contract with a contractor.  The amount to be paid for the task was $5,400 and it was disclosed (numerous times) to the contractor that his quote needed to remain a fixed quote. I was constantly told, through the process, that I would be "taken care of."
Towards the end, the job has not been complete, and I have paid the contracter over $8,000.  He had asked me, in the past, to pay his employees directly so he would not have to deal with the tax issues.  One of the employees had waited for two months to cash the check and the account was closed out (credit card, and did a balance transfer). I did not realize the check was outstanding.
The employee is threatening to sue me.  My impression would be that he needs to go to his employer for the money, and the employer can then decide to sue me.  My impression is, also, that they did not complete the job and I have already paid more then what was quoted (there is one witness to hearing the quote).
Do they have plausible legal recourse? Can this person take me to small claims court & win? If it is an empty threat then it is, if he is going to take me to court then I would like to sue the contractor for breach of a verbal contract. My next question would be - do I have a viable option?
Thank you.

Answer
Hi Avi,

Verbal or non-verbal, a contract is a contract is a contract.  Problems arise when the parties fall out and there is no written evidence of the basis of the Contract.  Then you have to persuade the judge as to who is correct; problematic and expensive at the best of times.  Several aspects of this question appear inconsistent or unusual.  Why did you pay employees direct?  The comments about tax suggest that someone did not want to be honest with the IRS.  If the price is a fixed lump sum, why pay more?  Why not put the minimum facts in writing at an early stage of the discussions?  

The employee could sue you either in the small claims court or through the procedure known as mechanic's lien.  At the very least you issued a cheque, which implies a financial obligation, and did not honour that cheque.  I suggest that you study the procedure for applying a mechanic's lien to the property.  There are many excellent websites (keywords 'mechanic's lien' on www.google.com or other search engine), both federal and commercial, which will explain the procedure from the view of the Contractor and the homeowner, so that you can see the possible defences and ensure that you make no errors to negate your efforts to defend the case.  

Your argument is with the Contractor, not the employee.  Thus you might wish to consider employing another contractor to complete the work and suing the first Contractor for breach of contract to recover any extra costs.  It will all get very messy and there will be tears.  Try to find the solution with the minimum cost and write off the extra expense against experience.

I hope that the above has helped, but feel free to ask a supplementary question if I have misunderstood anything.


Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.