AllExperts > Cricket 
Search      
Cricket
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Cricket Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Cricket Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Cricket
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Gary S Nichol
Expertise
General or specific questions on the MCC Laws of Cricket, which have changed recently. Also general question on the English First-Class game. Not too good with cricket in other countries, as I am English!

Experience
Qualified Member - Umpire of the Association of Cricket Umpires and Scorers (ACU&S). This catagory of membership, the highest possible for a cricket umpire, requires taking two written exams, an oral exam, two full years of experience and then approval of the application for membership by a committee. I have been umpiring full-time for the past 5 years

Organizations
The Association of Cricket Umpires and Scorers (United Kingdom)

Awards and Honors
1997 ACU&S Tom Smith Award
1999 ACU&S Arthur Sims Award

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Sports > Cricket > Cricket > Caught/LBW

Cricket - Caught/LBW


Expert: Gary S Nichol - 7/17/2009

Question
Regarding Ponting's dismissal today (if you haven't seen it, I'll
explain the scenario - initial appeal probably for LBW, ball would
have hit the stumps etc, ball caught at slip, umpire unsure whether
the batsman hit it), if the umpire is unsure  
whether the batsman hit the ball, but is certain that he is  
either a) out caught if he did hit it or b) out LBW if not, is  
it justified within the laws/regulations to give the batsman  
out?

Answer
Hello

I didn't see this but have also read about it.  The umpires did not consult to check if Ponting hit the ball, but to check if the catch was taken cleanly.  The striker's end umpire is in no place to comment on whether or not Ponting hit the ball.  So in the opinion of the bowler's end umpire the batsman did hit the ball, the catch was taken cleanly, and he is out, Caught.

Now, if the ball first hit the pad, then the bat, and then is caught, and the batsman is lined up for LBW then he still is out Caught.  This is in Law: regardless of what happens, bowled takes precedence over everything and after that, caught takes precedence.  So even if he was plumb LBW the catch takes precedence.  I should add that this is extremely difficult to get right - trying to work out if a ball hit the pad or bad, which are just a few cm apart, ball moving fast and you are 25 yards away it is not easy, which is probably why caught takes precedence over everything except bowled!

GSN

Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.