AllExperts > Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty 
Search      
Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About William A Saunders
Expertise
I can answer general questions about the legal system, how the courts work, corrections and law enforcement in general. I cannot provide legal advice.

Experience
The criminal justice system, juvenile justice, law enforcement, and community corrections/correctional education

Education/Credentials
Criminal Justice Degree

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Social Science > Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty > invasion of privacy

Crime & Law Enforcement Issues & Death Penalty - invasion of privacy


Expert: William A Saunders - 8/3/2009

Question
If a female sends a naked picture to a male and then she accuses him of sending it to other people, can he go to jail for that?

Answer
Hello.  This is a great question, and the answer is, it depends on a couple of things.  To begin with, the gender of the sender, or the receiver, does not matter, provided both people are of legal age. Another thing to consider is whether the photograph is copyright protected and was labeled as such.  If it is a professional photo and is protected by copyright laws, then the recipient is legally prohibited from any subsequent sharing of the photo. If it is a photo that someone took in the privacy of their home, is a personal photo, and is not copyright protected and the sender did not indicate that the photo should be kept private, then a legal concept that applies here is something called implied consent.

Implied consent is a category of consent that is not directly or specifically granted.  Consent is inferred – or implied – based on a person's actions.  In other words, the person who sent the nude photographs implied that the photos were not private by virtue of sending them to someone via e-mail, since Internet transmissions are not really private, and consent is further implied if the sender did not tell the recipient to keep them private.  If the sender did not indicate that the photos should remain private, then the person’s silence on the matter would lead most reasonable people to believe that those photos are public and NOT private.    

If, for the sake of argument, the photos were in fact a professional photo but were not labeled and did not contain a marking to indicate they were copyright protected, the recipient could still argue that it was reasonable to believe that the photo was not protected simply because of the fact that the sender attached it via an e-mail and did not indicate it should remain private.  

So, whether or not the recipient of the photos could face criminal charges or jail time depends on whether the photo was public or private.  In either case, it has nothing to do with privacy, since the photos were sent voluntarily.  If, on the other hand, someone hacked into the sender’s computer and found the photos and sent them out, then privacy concerns might apply.  But based on the facts you described, there is nothing to indicate that this pertains to privacy.  It will boil down to violations of copyright laws rather than  privacy laws.

Does this answer your question?  Please let me know if you have more questions on this.

Thanks


Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.